Afghan Women

[Powerlift66]

 

Lesley Stahl did a story on gender roles in Kabul, Afghanistan,   several years before our involvement in the Afghan conflict. She noted   that women customarily walked five paces behind their husbands.

She recently returned to Kabul and observed that women still walk behind their husbands.  
Despite the overthrow of the oppressive Taliban regime, the women now   seem to, and are happy to, maintain the old customs.

Ms. Stahl approached one of the Afghani women and asked, "Why do you now seem happy with an old custom that you once tried so desperately to change?"  

The woman looked Ms. Stahl straight in the eyes, and without   hesitation said, "Land mines.”  

  
  

[Pray_4_War]

No matter what language you speak or where you go the moral of the story is: 
   
 

Don't try to save mooslims because they don't want to be saved, and for fucksakes don't left them into your country.

[Matt]

No matter what language you speak or where you go the moral of the story is:

That women are full of shit when they claim oppression? That society is structured in a way that protects women, while claiming it oppressed them?

Even in Afghanistan. Hahaha, fuck.

[Tennisballz]

In any given society, the rise in power of women typically coincides with the decline and eventual destruction of a society.  The process took about 150 years to destroy Rome.  Here in the US we are on the cusp of about 100 years roughly as that was when women began to vote and feminism began to slowly rise.  We have maybe 50 years left if we are lucky.  As women slowly gain more power in a society, the men slowly become more emasculated.  Biologically, women will eventually look elsewhere for men as they are drawn to the alpha male type of personality.  I’m not talking about the fake natties banging fitness sluts type of alpha, but rather the old school alpha mentality of masculinity and decision making.  Real men who work hard get things done.  Lilly white feggits in the US and Europe don’t cut it anymore, so through voting and social engineering, feminism brings in dumb aggressive men from the 3rd world and those men slowly replace the emasculated ones.  Rinse, repeat and they cycle goes on.   

[IRON CROSS]

So Ms.Stahl speak local lingo !? & she was wondering around on her own ??.

[IRON CROSS]

Don't try to save mooslims because they don't want to be saved, and for fucksakes don't left them into your country.

Arming Afghans against Soviets in 70' was big, big mistake !.

[illuminati]

Who gives a Fuck about 4th world Afghanistan. 

[IRON CROSS]

Who gives a Fuck about 4th world Afghanistan. 

Too many NATO soldiers died in that shitty place   

[illuminati]

Too many NATO soldiers died in that shitty place   

True - And sadly for very little gain.

[Theoak*]

In any given society, the rise in power of women typically coincides with the decline and eventual destruction of a society.  The process took about 150 years to destroy Rome.  Here in the US we are on the cusp of about 100 years roughly as that was when women began to vote and feminism began to slowly rise.  We have maybe 50 years left if we are lucky.  As women slowly gain more power in a society, the men slowly become more emasculated.  Biologically, women will eventually look elsewhere for men as they are drawn to the alpha male type of personality.  I’m not talking about the fake natties banging fitness sluts type of alpha, but rather the old school alpha mentality of masculinity and decision making.  Real men who work hard get things done.  Lilly white feggits in the US and Europe don’t cut it anymore, so through voting and social engineering, feminism brings in dumb aggressive men from the 3rd world and those men slowly replace the emasculated ones.  Rinse, repeat and they cycle goes on.    

If a man is given some type of resources, he may use those resources to generate more resources than he had before. Allocating the same resources to a woman is usually malinvestment and pointless because the resources will not be used in a productive manner.  So the more patriarchal a nation is, the more likely it is to be an economic powerhouse.  The US is occupied by Jewish Marxists pushing things like feminism and radical seizure of male assets through the courts, so of course it will be totally useless economically.

If you allocate 50% of the resources to men and 50% to women, the male group is always going to vastly outperform the female group to the point where you can almost consider women holding any resources at all malinvestment for a civilization that's trying to compete against other civilizations.  Then factor in women have no interest in marrying men who are poorer than they are and you're self destructing your own civilization on purpose by trying to artificially rig some equitable outcome.

[Matt]

If a man is given some type of resources, he may use those resources to generate more resources than he had before. Allocating the same resources to a woman is usually malinvestment and pointless because the resources will not be used in a productive manner.  So the more patriarchal a nation is, the more likely it is to be an economic powerhouse.  The US is occupied by Jewish Marxists pushing things like feminism and radical seizure of male assets through the courts, so of course it will be totally useless economically.

If you allocate 50% of the resources to men and 50% to women, the male group is always going to vastly outperform the female group to the point where you can almost consider women holding any resources at all malinvestment for a civilization that's trying to compete against other civilizations.  Then factor in women have no interest in marrying men who are poorer than they are and you're self destructing your own civilization on purpose by trying to artificially rig some equitable outcome.

Yes!! Exactly. Feminists don't understand hypergamy.

Women universally and cross-culturally marry men who are:

- Around five years older than they are.
- Richer than they are.
- Socially of a higher class. As a "racist"' White man, this last one is complicated for me. I'm more popular than I am unpopular...but people who share my political views are in the closet, so women don't grasp the popularity of a man like Trump...even among other women.

I know three super hot women who "date down". They do this to control the breakup...and they all still get dumped, LOL.

Great comments, guys!! Love threads like this.

[Theoak*]

I’ve been saying it for years, majority of women fall into this category. Not all, but many. Women, even while in the workforce, are a large net negative as a tax base (i.e. they're drawing a lot more money from the govt than they put in over their lives).  This is not the case for men.  So technically they're not productive even while working.  It's numerous reasons from living 8-10 years longer, not being evolutionarily designed as resource gatherers so they suck at it, and also stemming from that fact, are terrible at managing money and resources in general. 

[Theoak*]

Yes!! Exactly. Feminists don't understand hypergamy.

Women universally and cross-cultural my marry men who are:

- Around five years older than they are.
- Richer than they are.
- Socially of a higher class. As a "racist"' White man, this last one is complicated for me. I'm more popular than I am unpopular...but people who share my political views are in the closet, so women don't grasp the popularity of a man like Trump...even among other
I know three super hot women who "date down". They do this to control the breakup...and they all still get dumped, LOL.

Great comments, guys!! Love threads like this.

I share a similar discourse with you, a generalisation of truths. As we know people hate truth as it messes with their illusions. Stereotypes and generalizations exist for a reason.  It's an inherent survival strategy.  Maybe cats don't like water because over millions of years, something would eat them when they got near a lake.  Claiming generalizations are bad is completely idiotic.  Stereotypes would also not even be offensive if they weren't based on the truth.

If you’re considered racist, so be it. Throw me in the same category.

[Matt]

I share a similar discourse with you, a generalisation of truths. As we know people hate truth as it messes with their illusions. Stereotypes and generalizations exist for a reason.  It's an inherent survival strategy.  Maybe cats don't like water because over millions of years, something would eat them when they got near a lake.  Claiming generalizations are bad is completely idiotic.  Stereotypes would also not even be offensive if they weren't based on the truth.

If you’re considered racist, so be it. Throw me in the same category.

I will definitely be keeping an eye out for your posts threads in the future!

I think the reason why Getbig survived where MuscleMayhem didn't is that we are more realistic of human nature on here. Mayhem moderators were warned, didn't listen, and the website eventually folded.

Getbig allows nature to take its course. That's why it was more popular in the long run.

Anyone in denial of human nature will have to face reality eventually.

Gender equality feminists masturbate to rape porn at disproportionate rates. None of these girls REALLY want equality.

To be honest, I am pretty egalitarian as a man. I understand that I am in charge as the male...and in case myself and a female are attacked by a mugger, I am in charge. But I am otherwise quite egalitarian.

And I hate that.

I'm able to shut shit-testing females up very quickly. But I prefer not dealing with shit-tests to begin with. I usually just stop talking to such women...which also stops the shit-tests.