Author Topic: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller  (Read 16724 times)

Board_SHERIF

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7279
  • UK Independence Party
Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« on: May 30, 2019, 08:20:18 AM »
Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller could barley put two sentences together yesterday as he spoke shaking like a leaf. He  had the body language of a liar and thus lied. He also broke ethical rules of what prosecutors keep to by his bizarre appearance and false statements.

If there was any evidence of crimes committed by Trump, they would of been detailed and then it would of been noted that the POTUS could not be charged while in office. But NADA.

Now even Libatards are making fun of the corrupted old fool

Cant inbed the youtube so see link below

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3f1c6ojgGA

edit - video taken down, guess libatards up to their old trick again.
K

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 38827
  • Reality ruined my life
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2019, 08:31:40 AM »
Legal-speak.

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20492
  • loco like a fox
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2019, 08:38:41 AM »
Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller could barley put two sentences together yesterday, and had the body language of a liar. He also broke ethical rules of what prosecutors keep to.

Now even Libatards are making fun of the corrupted old fool

Cant inbed the youtube so see link below



B_MyT_2

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 427
  • Kwon is the ungayer of every thread on this site!
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2019, 12:03:03 PM »
Legal-speak.

No....threatened speak.  He knows he might end up dead if he didn't do this last favor for the Clintons

Remember, this dude was a vietnam vet and has been in high level gov't for years.  There's no other reason for the way he was behaving, as he's been in front of people speaking and dealt with danger far worse than speaking in public.  However, vietnam pales in comparison to committing suicide via two gunshots to the back of your head. ;)

Board_SHERIF

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7279
  • UK Independence Party
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2019, 12:44:26 PM »
No....threatened speak.  He knows he might end up dead if he didn't do this last favor for the Clintons

Remember, this dude was a vietnam vet and has been in high level gov't for years.  There's no other reason for the way he was behaving, as he's been in front of people speaking and dealt with danger far worse than speaking in public.  However, vietnam pales in comparison to committing suicide via two gunshots to the back of your head. ;)

Just like Clinton, Muller was "set up" with a slam dunk but still failed. He lied yesterday to try and make up for his fail. He could of pulled it off if Jeff Dolt Sessions was still AG.
K

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2019, 01:36:59 PM »
Same old Trumptards with their idiotic conspiracy theories.

Quick summary of what Mueller said

1.  Russia interferred with our election to help one candidate (he didn't mention which one but we all know who) and he said

2.  He directly contradicted our phony AG Barr and confirmed that he could not indict the POTUS due to a DOJ Policy

3.  He said he could not exonerate Trump and if he could have he would have

4.  He said “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” which is a pretty obvious cue to Congress to act.

Cry on Trumptards


funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42526
  • Getbig!
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2019, 02:59:00 PM »
meanwhile the latest shipment has arrived. just keeping the playing field level i guess. ::) ::) ::) ::)
F

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59480
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2019, 05:38:49 PM »
Same old Trumptards with their idiotic conspiracy theories.

Quick summary of what Mueller said

1.  Russia interferred with our election to help one candidate (he didn't mention which one but we all know who) and he said

2.  He directly contradicted our phony AG Barr and confirmed that he could not indict the POTUS due to a DOJ Policy

3.  He said he could not exonerate Trump and if he could have he would have

4.  He said “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” which is a pretty obvious cue to Congress to act.

Cry on Trumptards


1) FBI has already stated that "Russians" put out ads for Bernie, Killary and Trump, now it's only one candidate?  ::)
2) Which DOJ policy is that?
3) If he had evidence that Trump committed a crime he would have charged him or presented it to congress, or is Mueller hiding that evidence?
4) Congress to act on what? With no evidence present, what would you like congress to accuse Trump of doing?
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Slapper

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4305
  • Vincit qui se vincit
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2019, 07:03:29 PM »
Correct me if I'm wrong but... even his "I can't give specifics" is full of shit.

There were four investigations into the issue and one or two had folks from the intelligence committee on it. Meaning any classified information could've been presented to them, HAD there been any.

Why is this still being fucking discussed? This ASSHOLE put the POTUS on the pedestal on an obvious character assassination exercise the likes not seen since the McArthy era and... dassit? Press conference just to say that he's got evidence but that he can't nail the guy due to some DOJ loophole?

And we pay these MOTHERFUCKERS to do THIS?????

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42328
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2019, 12:36:23 AM »
Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller could barley put two sentences together yesterday as he spoke shaking like a leaf. He  had the body language of a liar and thus lied. He also broke ethical rules of what prosecutors keep to by his bizarre appearance and false statements.

If there was any evidence of crimes committed by Trump, they would of been detailed and then it would of been noted that the POTUS could not be charged while in office. But NADA.

Now even Libatards are making fun of the corrupted old fool

Cant inbed the youtube so see link below

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3f1c6ojgGA

edit - video taken down, guess libatards up to their old trick again.

You live in a fantasy world.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42328
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2019, 12:42:42 AM »
Same old Trumptards with their idiotic conspiracy theories.

Quick summary of what Mueller said

1.  Russia interferred with our election to help one candidate (he didn't mention which one but we all know who) and he said

2.  He directly contradicted our phony AG Barr and confirmed that he could not indict the POTUS due to a DOJ Policy

3.  He said he could not exonerate Trump and if he could have he would have

4.  He said “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” which is a pretty obvious cue to Congress to act.

Cry on Trumptards



Yup! That's what he said alright. It apparently fell on deaf ears around here. There are so many folks with their heads up there asses that it is pitiful.


mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2019, 04:55:27 AM »
He can't exonerate because that is not part of his job.

His statement is not necessarily in conflict with Barr. Unless I missed something, Mueller never stated that he would have charged if not for that policy. He was a coward so no one got to ask him that. Barr did. He was using word games to mess with your minds.
If I did miss that part and he was directly contradicting Barr then one guy was willing to say it under oath and the other ran for the hills. Hmmm....

Board_SHERIF

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7279
  • UK Independence Party
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #12 on: May 31, 2019, 08:00:08 AM »
You live in a fantasy world.

Or is it you ? 
K

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20492
  • loco like a fox
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2019, 08:23:28 AM »
Or is it you ? 

That privileged liberal, white homo sure does live in fantasy world.

B_MyT_2

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 427
  • Kwon is the ungayer of every thread on this site!
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2019, 08:32:30 AM »
That privileged liberal, white homo sure does live in fantasy world.

Stupid quasi-faggit can't be bothered with the fact that he told Barr in front of multiple witnesses that the OLC had nothing to do with his findings...........reite rated 3 mutha fucking times, but Prime can't be bothered with such details and lies of the Dems/Mueller.

JustPlaneJane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5009
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2019, 02:16:46 PM »
Libidiots put all their impeachment eggs in the Little Bobby Mueller basket and they got ass-reamed again.

I can’t wait until they count on Jerrold Nadler next, then Joe Biden in 2020!

Even Downs Syndrome kids get tired of losing sometime, but not Liberals !

Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2019, 03:06:43 PM »
He can't exonerate because that is not part of his job.

His statement is not necessarily in conflict with Barr. Unless I missed something, Mueller never stated that he would have charged if not for that policy. He was a coward so no one got to ask him that. Barr did. He was using word games to mess with your minds.
If I did miss that part and he was directly contradicting Barr then one guy was willing to say it under oath and the other ran for the hills. Hmmm....

He also stated that he wouldn’t be speaking on this issue anymore, meaning that he didn’t want to be grilled by Republicans who might actually ask him some tough questions.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2019, 07:46:43 PM »
Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller could barley put two sentences together yesterday as he spoke shaking like a leaf. He  had the body language of a liar and thus lied. He also broke ethical rules of what prosecutors keep to by his bizarre appearance and false statements.

If there was any evidence of crimes committed by Trump, they would of been detailed and then it would of been noted that the POTUS could not be charged while in office. But NADA.

Now even Libatards are making fun of the corrupted old fool

Cant inbed the youtube so see link below

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3f1c6ojgGA

edit - video taken down, guess libatards up to their old trick again.

That your fellow Republicans didn't call you out on this post is telling...

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #18 on: May 31, 2019, 07:53:37 PM »
1) FBI has already stated that "Russians" put out ads for Bernie, Killary and Trump, now it's only one candidate?  ::)
2) Which DOJ policy is that?
3) If he had evidence that Trump committed a crime he would have charged him or presented it to congress, or is Mueller hiding that evidence?
4) Congress to act on what? With no evidence present, what would you like congress to accuse Trump of doing?


Let me help you out.

1,  Russia wanted to create turmoil and dissent among americans. Originally it was wide spread with many candidates. When it came down to Hillary and Trump it was clear Russia sided with Trump.

2.  The policy blocking indicting a sitting president dates back to the presidency of Richard Nixon. In September 1973, just under a year before Nixon resigned, the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel determined that a criminal case against the president “would interfere with the President’s unique official duties, most of which cannot be performed by anyone else.” Therefore, impeachment is the only manner by which a sitting president can be penalized for wrongdoing.

3.  See # 2 and read the Mueller report where he goes into detail about it at the beginning of Volume 2

4. He outlined 10 instances, 4 with "substantial evidence of obstruction"  that he felt was up to Congress to pursue, since {see #2)

Now I personally think Mueller was a coward for not being more decisive either way. There was nothing legally keeping him from saying "But for the fact we could not indict him, under other circumstances he would be indicted." Instead he went with a limp wristed "If we were confident he did not commit a crime we would have said so" 

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42328
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #19 on: May 31, 2019, 07:55:44 PM »
Or is it you ? 

Possibly, but this fantasy life seems very real, satisfying and successful. I worked for it for over 55 years. My income today is better than it was when I first retired in 2009. My expenses are very limited, going mostly to food, utilities and and frivolous stuff. I spend less than half of my monthly income. If this is what a fantasy life feels like, bring it on!

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2019, 07:57:03 PM »
Possibly, but this fantasy life seems very real, satisfying and successful. I worked for it for over 55 years. My income today is better than it was when I first retired in 2009. My expenses are very limited, going mostly to food, utilities and and frivolous stuff. I spend less than half of my monthly income. If this is what a fantasy life feels like, bring it on!

congrats on your happy life

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42328
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #21 on: May 31, 2019, 08:08:54 PM »
Stupid quasi-faggit can't be bothered with the fact that he told Barr in front of multiple witnesses that the OLC had nothing to do with his findings...........reite rated 3 mutha fucking times, but Prime can't be bothered with such details and lies of the Dems/Mueller.

Mueller remarks put Barr back into harsh spotlight
Democrats and some Republicans saw a statement that 'contradicts' and even 'rebuke' Trump's attorney general.


By ELIANA JOHNSON 05/29/2019 05:48 PM EDT Updated 05/29/2019 08:41 PM EDT

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/29/robert-mueller-william-barr-1346881

What the heck is a quasi-faggit? (sexually fluid?)

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59480
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #22 on: May 31, 2019, 09:22:41 PM »
Let me help you out.

1,  Russia wanted to create turmoil and dissent among americans. Originally it was wide spread with many candidates. When it came down to Hillary and Trump it was clear Russia sided with Trump.

2.  The policy blocking indicting a sitting president dates back to the presidency of Richard Nixon. In September 1973, just under a year before Nixon resigned, the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel determined that a criminal case against the president “would interfere with the President’s unique official duties, most of which cannot be performed by anyone else.” Therefore, impeachment is the only manner by which a sitting president can be penalized for wrongdoing.

3.  See # 2 and read the Mueller report where he goes into detail about it at the beginning of Volume 2

4. He outlined 10 instances, 4 with "substantial evidence of obstruction"  that he felt was up to Congress to pursue, since {see #2)

Now I personally think Mueller was a coward for not being more decisive either way. There was nothing legally keeping him from saying "But for the fact we could not indict him, under other circumstances he would be indicted." Instead he went with a limp wristed "If we were confident he did not commit a crime we would have said so" 
1) Had Trump lost the election, we would never have heard about Russia.
2)Mueller could have stated that he had the evidence to turn over for indictment and turned it over to Congress, but he didn't because the entire report is a he said/she said fluff piece with NO actual evidence.
3) See #2
4) That "substantial evidence" was all heresy, absolutely unprovable quotes from people with questionable relationships to Trump.


I absolutely agree with your statement about Mueller, although I think he tried to sway public opinion with his comment, which is a shitty thing to do if you aren't going to take questions or back up your statements.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Board_SHERIF

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7279
  • UK Independence Party
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #23 on: June 01, 2019, 07:38:45 AM »
Let me help you out.


4. He outlined 10 instances, 4 with "substantial evidence of obstruction"  that he felt was up to Congress to pursue, since {see #2)

Now I personally think Mueller was a coward for not being more decisive either way. There was nothing legally keeping him from saying "But for the fact we could not indict him, under other circumstances he would be indicted." Instead he went with a limp wristed "If we were confident he did not commit a crime we would have said so"  


The instances ? LOL - I guess a formerly sacked security guard like you would consider those as hard evidence  ::)

Or was Mueller a Russian Agent and did not do what anyone with even average intelligence/skills would do and list in detail the crimes ?
K

Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: Stumbling Mumbling Old Fool Mueller
« Reply #24 on: June 01, 2019, 10:32:31 AM »

The instances ? LOL - I guess a formerly sacked security guard like you would consider those as hard evidence  ::)

Or was Mueller a Russian Agent and did not do what anyone with even average intelligence/skills would do and list in detail the crimes ?

You know desperation is sinking in when they’re hitching their wagon to obstruction of justice for a nonexistent crime.