This is quite possibly a "honey-trap" scenario, whereby, the real motive is not to get a criminal conviction in itself, but rather to obtain civil damages for rape, from a target who clearly has some money (due to his recent Olympia win and related income). The sad consequence of which being that his career and reputation are left severely tarnished. Meanwhile, the "victim" could get a financial payout, and further sell her story to the media for a 6 figure sum to the national enquirer or 60 minutes - "How a vulnerable fitness model was raped by My Olympia". You can imagine the sound-bites "He completely overwhelmed me with his power ... I was totally helpless, sob sob" (dabbing tears with tissue). It is well known that the accuser has shown a prior interest getting media attention.
The most suspicious apsects of this matter are as follows:
1 - She came into his room (and not the other way around).
2 - Whilst (she claims) he sucked and licked her breasts, there were no "bight-marks". Many rapists would actually bight their breasts or nipples.
3 - There were no bruises. If he had raped her, she would have bruised her arms or legs etc as he held her down and she struggled to get away.
4 - Related to 3 above, not a single scratch on him. Often a rapist would have some scratch marks from the victim.
5 - Her previous history of scams and fraud (conspiring with her husband and others to do so), demonstrating her being of poor character.
6 - The part about him putting in only the tip of his penis into her pussy is the most suspicious "fact" of all. What man could control himself well enough to insert only just his tip into a fitness model's pussy, (as opposed to the over-riding natural instinct to ram it in all the way). Let alone a man pumped totally full of exogenous testosterone and androgenic compounds to the extent required of an IFBB level competitor. And let alone an actual rapist. Except perhaps in cases of child rape, it is unheard of a rapist to rape with "just the tip of his penis". That would have to be one of the most "gentle" rapes of all time. If you simply visualize the scenario of him raping her with the tip of his penis you will realize the ludicrousness of the claim that this is what occurred, and I think any red-blooded man, and indeed any women of any sexual experience with men will agree with this.
Sordid as it may sound, these exact details, including how long the tip of Shawn's penis was in her, and the circumstances of how it came to be in there etc, why there was not even any trace of any pre-cum or semen / sperms found in her pussy (or any other orifice such as her anus or mouth, or indeed any article of clothing (panties, towel, bed sheets etc) need to be explored. I am sure these issues will be vigorously cross-examined, in the event this case does go to trial.
Remember, in a criminal trial, he is presumed innocent, unless it can be proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that his is guilty. I maintain he will not be convicted. They will try to pressure him into making a guilty plea in return for a reduce sentence, and so he now had the difficult decision of accepting, and forever being known as a rapist, or defending his honor and reputation as a matter of principle, with an expensive legal trial (but with a very good chance of winning).
And then, even if he wins (or worse if he loses) the criminal trial, she can then commence a civil trial in any case (with a much lower burden of proof), and still obtain an award of damages, or a financial settlement, in any such trial. You can guarantee they will be seeking 1m USD+ although they might eventually settle in the $400-$500K range. Such is the dilemma facing Shawn now. Desiree Washington is rumered to have settled for more than 4m USD after Mike Tyson allegedly raped (and also allegedly sodomized her), and that was back in the 1990s, when 1 million was a lot of money), and a highly politicized case.
