Iran can repeat many times

[tatoo]

Every single one of US moves in the area has backfired. US created Al Quada in Afghanistan. Destroying prosperous, civilized Libya - turning it into an Islamist hellhole of slavery and death - gave their vast cache of arm to ISIS. US support of terrorists in Syria has failed. Iraq has always been a mess. US seem to make things worse on purpose. Losing is an amurican thing,.......korea, vietnam, lebanon, syria, iran, iraq, ukraine, venezuela,etc... Just one long line of loss after loss, losers don't know when to quit, that's why they call them losers....

you are in fuckin la la land... the usa has won 2 world wars dipshit.. you should take your own advice and quit posting.. communist bitch.

[Griffith]

you are in fuckin la la land... the usa has won 2 world wars dipshit.. you should take your own advice and quit posting.. communist bitch.

Iran has a handful of 1970's Soviet era tanks and Migs and a currency worth toilet paper.

With US air superiority, all their infrastructure and military installations would be destroyed at will.

[loco]

you are in fuckin la la land... the usa has won 2 world wars dipshit.. you should take your own advice and quit posting.. communist bitch.

Then won the cold war against the Soviet Union, then defeated and kicked Iraq out of Kuwait, then defeated the Taliban in Afghanistan, then invaded Iraq and removed Barack Hussein.

[RK]

you are in fuckin la la land... the usa has won 2 world wars dipshit.. you should take your own advice and quit posting.. communist bitch.

You didn't win any war
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/09/11/we-lost-the-war-in-afghanistan-get-over-it/

We Lost the War in Afghanistan. Get Over It.
After 18 years of war, thousands of lives lost, and hundreds of billions of dollars squandered, the United States accomplished precisely nothing.

[RK]

US defense failure… Why Washington has to blame Iran over Saudi attacks

The devastating blitz on Saudi Arabia’s oil industry has led to a flurry of accusations from US officials blaming Iran. The reason for the finger-pointing is simple: Washington’s spectacular failure to protect its Saudi ally.

Saudi Arabia has spent billions of dollars in recent years purchasing US Patriot missile defense systems and supposedly cutting-edge radar technology from the Pentagon.

 Saudi oil exports nominated in dollars for trade – the biggest on the planet – are vital for maintaining the petrodollar global market, which is in turn crucial for American economic power.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo got it half right when he claimed, “Iran launched an unprecedented attack on the world’s energy supply”.

Yes, it is unprecedented. But Pompeo and other US officials have most likely got it wrong about blaming Iran.

Saudi air defenses like Patriot & Aegis don’t match their advertised properties, unfit for real combat – Russian Army (MAP)

Multiple Patriot launchers, Aegis destroyers and radars are guarding Saudi skies, but they failed to stop a massive strike on an oilfield because their actual properties aren’t what the US advertises, a Russian Army source says.
Benefiting from the US arms deliveries, Saudi Arabia managed to build up “the most powerful air defense system in the region that provides full radar coverage,” a high-ranking Russian military source stated on Thursday.

“They’re simply unable to repel an enemy assault involving a massive use of airworthy weapons in real combat,” he explained.

He spoke just as international media struggle to find out why the Kingdom’s military could do nothing to stop an aerial attack on the Abqaiq petroleum facilities and Khurais oil field.

[Griffith]

US defense failure… Why Washington has to blame Iran over Saudi attacks

The devastating blitz on Saudi Arabia’s oil industry has led to a flurry of accusations from US officials blaming Iran. The reason for the finger-pointing is simple: Washington’s spectacular failure to protect its Saudi ally.

Saudi Arabia has spent billions of dollars in recent years purchasing US Patriot missile defense systems and supposedly cutting-edge radar technology from the Pentagon.

 Saudi oil exports nominated in dollars for trade – the biggest on the planet – are vital for maintaining the petrodollar global market, which is in turn crucial for American economic power.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo got it half right when he claimed, “Iran launched an unprecedented attack on the world’s energy supply”.

Yes, it is unprecedented. But Pompeo and other US officials have most likely got it wrong about blaming Iran.

Saudi air defenses like Patriot & Aegis don’t match their advertised properties, unfit for real combat – Russian Army (MAP)

Multiple Patriot launchers, Aegis destroyers and radars are guarding Saudi skies, but they failed to stop a massive strike on an oilfield because their actual properties aren’t what the US advertises, a Russian Army source says.
Benefiting from the US arms deliveries, Saudi Arabia managed to build up “the most powerful air defense system in the region that provides full radar coverage,” a high-ranking Russian military source stated on Thursday.

“They’re simply unable to repel an enemy assault involving a massive use of airworthy weapons in real combat,” he explained.

He spoke just as international media struggle to find out why the Kingdom’s military could do nothing to stop an aerial attack on the Abqaiq petroleum facilities and Khurais oil field.

Iran is a poor and technologically backwards country with a poorly armed military and extremely weak currency.

Their regime will get wiped out if they try anything.

[RK]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1224393/donald-trump-news-iran-conflict-us-military-qasem-soleimani-ayatollah-ali-khamenei

DONALD TRUMP’s America could easily be defeated by Iran in any future military conflict, according to the outcome of a US military simulation carried out in 2002.

Yet, despite its technological superiority, a series of war games carried out by the Pentagon in 2002 showed how a less sophisticated army could inflict a humiliating defeat on the US military on a scale to rival Pearl Harbour by using unconventional tactics.

The war games were dubbed the Millennium Challenge and were designed to test the US military’s ability to defeat an opponent like Iran.

Costing $250 £191) million, the simulation involved both live exercises and computer games.

Two teams competed for supremacy against each other, with the Red Team (OPFOR), representing Iran, and the Blue team the United States.

The Red team was tasked with preserving its ruling regime and to drive their opponents out of the region.

For their part, the Blue team’s objectives were to destroy their opponents weapons of mass destruction, secure shipping lanes and prevent the Red Team from establishing dominance in the Middle East.

To the horror of Pentagon chiefs, the outcome was a crushing victory for the Reds, until the rules of the contest were quickly changed to ensure a Blue’s victory.

Led by a veteran of the Vietnam war, US Marine Corps commander Lieutenant General Paul Van Riper, the Red team managed to sink most of the US task force to the bottom of the Persian Gulf in days using the much smaller military capability of Iran.

[RK]

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/2002-us-military-conducted-iran-war-simulation-iran-won-82906

In 2002, the U.S. Military Conducted an Iran War Simulation. Iran Won.

[RK]

I'm already scared at how delusional the military buffoons they have showing up on FOX / CNN are, they are the some ones who predicted that Iran wouldn't dare launch a conventional strike at the U.S. ever because they are so outclassed. They also laughed at the 'minimal damage'.

Iran was able to target specific buildings hundreds of miles away and completely avoid our vaunted anti-missile defenses. I do not believe that it is SOP to not intercept missiles just because the troops are bunkered, that would be very risky as we do not know what type of payload are in the missiles.

So now we know that Iran has good missiles. Can we take them all out? No, Iran's missile inventory is spread out and mobile. For years we have been hearing the FDD lie that Iran was increasing their missile range to hit Paris and New York to justify aggression against them but those type of missiles are too large, easy to spot, hard to maintain, and immobile. Iran has concentrated on small / medium range, tactically efficient missiles for self defense and deterrence.

Maybe the liars have started to believe their own lies. This is what happens when you change your focus from intel gathering to information warfare. You become dimwitted.

[wes]

Somebody please ban this commie kunt !!

[Kwon]

Somebody please ban this commie kunt !!

RK must be deported.

[wes]

RK must be deported.

I agree but he needs a beating first.

[Kwon]

I agree but he needs a beating first.

He needs to be taken care of The Soggster first, giving him the FULL treatment, THEN beaten, then deported.

[RK]

US bases in Iraq were protected with a ring of Centurion C-RAM Phalanx ( Like warships) to intercept incoming missiles ( beside rockets,drones, artillery projectile)...and FAILED!..

[Rusty Trombone]

Then won the cold war against the Soviet Union, then defeated and kicked Iraq out of Kuwait, then defeated the Taliban in Afghanistan, then invaded Iraq and removed Barack Hussein.

So many American lives lost,and not one country annexed. No land aquired....pathetic.

[Griffith]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1224393/donald-trump-news-iran-conflict-us-military-qasem-soleimani-ayatollah-ali-khamenei

DONALD TRUMP’s America could easily be defeated by Iran in any future military conflict, according to the outcome of a US military simulation carried out in 2002.

Yet, despite its technological superiority, a series of war games carried out by the Pentagon in 2002 showed how a less sophisticated army could inflict a humiliating defeat on the US military on a scale to rival Pearl Harbour by using unconventional tactics.

The war games were dubbed the Millennium Challenge and were designed to test the US military’s ability to defeat an opponent like Iran.

Costing $250 £191) million, the simulation involved both live exercises and computer games.

Two teams competed for supremacy against each other, with the Red Team (OPFOR), representing Iran, and the Blue team the United States.

The Red team was tasked with preserving its ruling regime and to drive their opponents out of the region.

For their part, the Blue team’s objectives were to destroy their opponents weapons of mass destruction, secure shipping lanes and prevent the Red Team from establishing dominance in the Middle East.

To the horror of Pentagon chiefs, the outcome was a crushing victory for the Reds, until the rules of the contest were quickly changed to ensure a Blue’s victory.

Led by a veteran of the Vietnam war, US Marine Corps commander Lieutenant General Paul Van Riper, the Red team managed to sink most of the US task force to the bottom of the Persian Gulf in days using the much smaller military capability of Iran.

 

As if they have no extra experience in dealing with terrorists and terrorist regimes since then.

[IRON CROSS]

RK must be deported.

RON , do you still own this website !?.

[IRON CROSS]

I'm already scared at how delusional the military buffoons they have showing up on FOX / CNN are, they are the some ones who predicted that Iran wouldn't dare launch a conventional strike at the U.S. ever because they are so outclassed. They also laughed at the 'minimal damage'.

Iran was able to target specific buildings hundreds of miles away and completely avoid our vaunted anti-missile defenses. I do not believe that it is SOP to not intercept missiles just because the troops are bunkered, that would be very risky as we do not know what type of payload are in the missiles.

So now we know that Iran has good missiles. Can we take them all out? No, Iran's missile inventory is spread out and mobile. For years we have been hearing the FDD lie that Iran was increasing their missile range to hit Paris and New York to justify aggression against them but those type of missiles are too large, easy to spot, hard to maintain, and immobile. Iran has concentrated on small / medium range, tactically efficient missiles for self defense and deterrence.

Maybe the liars have started to believe their own lies. This is what happens when you change your focus from intel gathering to information warfare. You become dimwitted.

Iranian IDIOT, IDF Air Force can destroy all of your shit in just 1 attack.

[pellius]

So many American lives lost,and not one country annexed. No land aquired....pathetic.

Which demonstrates the goodness of America. We saved the world from Communism. Saved Kuwait. Allowed a prosperous and free South Korea to exist. Allowed a prosperous and free West Germany to exist and latter we unified Germany where they can all live without the boot of Communism on their necks. And we did it to make the world a better place. We could have taken the oil fields in Iraq or annex other countries but we didn't. We went into Korea and Vietnam not because we wanted their land or resources but to prevent Communist expansion.

Not annexing other countries, not taking their land and resources when we could, is not pathetic. It's good. Shake your head all you want. You're an ingrate. America is a force for good in this world and just try to imagine what kind of world we would be living in if it wasn't for the good old United States.

[chaos]

Loosen the ROE and Iran doesn't last a week. Their buddy Obama isn't running the show anymore.

[Montague]

Dud missiles which missed and did not explode.

Did they forget to put in the part that goes "boom?"

[tatoo]

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/2002-us-military-conducted-iran-war-simulation-iran-won-82906

In 2002, the U.S. Military Conducted an Iran War Simulation. Iran Won.

war simulation? lol.. stupid bitch...how about Trumps 2020 military?  no one on this planet has a shot .. don't kid yourself commie.. your shit hole country could be next.. this is not the time to fuck with America.

[Kwon]

Trumps 2020 Military > Any military.


Unless you do a simulation on a ZX 81 with RK's parameters.

[Tapeworm]

Trumps 2020 Military > Any military.

Not if you don't use it.

[mac33]

Iranian general gets killed. And Iran responds by firing over a dozen missiles, killing nobody.


I’m sure that the general that was killed would’ve been very impressed with Iran’s response 🙂

Correction, they killed a lot of Iranians