Need more links
Really? Works fine for me. I guess I got lucky.
Lol @ the decision in the Murphy vs. Lee fight [I can't remember who was on the "A" side, or what the order was of the results presented]. But how do three judges get this result?:
29-28 Murphy
29-28 Lee
30-27 Murphy
So three judges each gave a completely different result: one judge gave her one round, another judge gave her two rounds, and the third judge gave her three rounds.
In the listing above, it would be the second judge who gave Murphy only one round, whereas the third judge gave Murphy all three rounds.
And that as the second fight tonight that had a result like that. The other was a male fight, and Rogan said that it was criminal that anyone would give all three rounds to the fighter who got the 30-27.
Here's the fight that I'm talking about:
Bantamweight Andre Ewell def. Jonathan Martinez Decision (split) (28-29, 29-28, 30-27)
^ ROFL! Again, with one judge giving all three rounds to a fighter, and another judge giving that same fighter only one round of three.
Is UFC judging generally considered worse than IFBB judging? I realize that both are subjective [for MMA, in the case of decisions, they are subjective], but I never thought any judging would be considered worse than the IFBB, lol. It seems that the UFC judges get a lot of criticism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFC_247