Author Topic: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo  (Read 1570 times)

Roast Beef Pecs

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 566
I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« on: February 20, 2020, 01:36:40 PM »

Upper arm looking small, almost withered. WTF?

robcguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20124
  • Founder of the proud straight white male movement
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2020, 01:39:51 PM »

Upper arm looking small, almost withered. WTF?

It’s prob 15.5 and at its biggest was prob 16.5” in 4 brothers or pain and gain.Just angles.

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49799
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2020, 01:44:11 PM »
It’s prob 15.5 and at its biggest was prob 16.5” in 4 brothers or pain and gain.Just angles.

Rob, maybe closer to 18"?

X

Roast Beef Pecs

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 566
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2020, 01:44:47 PM »

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42655
  • Getbig!
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2020, 01:46:52 PM »
more like 13 he's only 5 ft 6.
F

Roast Beef Pecs

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 566
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2020, 02:06:38 PM »
more like 13 he's only 5 ft 6.
No, he's 5 ft 8 and worth $300,000,000.00. And you champ?

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42655
  • Getbig!
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2020, 02:18:07 PM »
No, he's 5 ft 8 and worth $300,000,000.00. And you champ?
    5ft 8 and a quarter net worth maybe 50 to 100 dollars depending on the day of the week. marky mark is 5 ft 6 and a half at best.
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42655
  • Getbig!
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2020, 02:26:05 PM »
    5ft 8 and a quarter net worth maybe 50 to 100 dollars depending on the day of the week. marky mark is 5 ft 6 and a half at best.
;D    john liquiddrano is even shorter 5 ft 4 and a half.
F

robcguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20124
  • Founder of the proud straight white male movement
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #8 on: February 20, 2020, 02:37:02 PM »
Rob, maybe closer to 18"?



I’d say 17ish there cause of height.Looks good either way.

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #9 on: February 20, 2020, 02:43:05 PM »
he's useless to us now.

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #10 on: February 20, 2020, 02:53:21 PM »
Manlet in real life, would get lost in a crowd.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71488
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #11 on: February 20, 2020, 03:06:22 PM »
Yet another gay thread by YAGR !!

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 52272
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #12 on: February 20, 2020, 03:08:27 PM »
Manlet in real life, would get lost in a crowd.

Big on screen though



Q

Powerlift66

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11452
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #13 on: February 20, 2020, 04:02:50 PM »
I dont mind Mark. Affleck though (Ben) total tool...

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #14 on: February 20, 2020, 04:18:48 PM »
My biceps were 15.5" pumped in this photo - at their biggest, my biceps were 16.7", flexed and pumped [I was 195-lb at that time, as opposed to around 175-lb in this photo].

I suspect that Mark Wahlberg's arms are at LEAST 16" in the photos attached below.  They may be in the 17-18" range, given that he does not have Mr. Olympia levels of body fat [he claims 6.9% body fat in the photos below, but I'm not so sure about that].

Mark has always had good genetics for bodybuilding, and was actually considering being a pro bodybuilder in 1993, while he was between his White rapper, and model stage, and before his Hollywood career took off.  I read that maybe in 2001, when I ordered his "Form, Focus, Fitness" VHS from EBAY.

It could just be the shape of his arms making them look so big...but I would be surprised if his biceps measured any lower than 17" pumped/flexed.

The last photo was from Mark's underwear model days [1992], and I could see his biceps being smaller during that time, maybe around 15" or thereabouts, at a weight of around 170-lb.

harmankardon1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3097
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #15 on: February 20, 2020, 09:40:37 PM »
Manlet in real life, would get lost in a crowd.

This^

If not for hollyweird he would be worn out make prostitute by now....

AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19697
  • Affeman Is Numero Uno
Re: I am dissatisfied with Wahlberg's arm in this photo
« Reply #16 on: February 20, 2020, 09:42:51 PM »
This^

If not for hollyweird he would be worn out make prostitute by now....

Waiting for him to testify against Harvey Weinstein.