RUSTY JEFFERS SPEAKS OUT (No Jokes)

[timfogarty]

i emailed him about this. he was cool enough to get back to me he said that 8 years ago muscle web and gallery wasnt geared toward the gay

he's either giving you a line, or was very naïve

he also said hes thought about "getting my agent invovled" did feel it fair they amek him out to be soeting he aint

it's his signature on the model release

[LuciusFox]

he's either giving you a line, or was very naïve

it's his signature on the model release

 I've got to say, even though you probably didn't intend for it to be, this was a brutal owning!

[ssparty]

he's either giving you a line, or was very naïve

it's his signature on the model release

i gues he did expect fags like you to populate and become the main consumers of his images on those sites

[SexRockSushi]

Ron wrote:

"You know - once again - I don't think 99% of the people who saw the show live and on the webcast would argue that Bob didn't win this show. He did, fair and square. No conspiracy - no favors from the IFBB - no favors from bodybuilding.com

He won the show, via a weak lineup, but still, he won the show fair and square. And it you cant get that into your heads, then you are just fooling yourselves.

And then he gives $1,000 special fan prize money to Shawn Ray's CHOC. For those of you who don't know what that is, it is Children's Hospital of Orange County. For the kids who really need it. Damn, now that was cool. A professional bodybuilding actually doing something good in the business.

But still, some of you think it is a ploy.

A conspiracy.

Now while I agree on some things, this obviously is not - and it makes some of you look real bad in thinking so.

Now - as for Rusty Jeffers - that is a whole different story - and many, many people agree that he should of been in the top 5, at least compared to some of the top guys there.

But that has nothing to do with Chick.

Milos once complained that there weren't enough comparisons. Since I wasnt at the show, do we have what the comparisons were for round 1 & 2???"

So you think 99% of the people agrred with the placing.  Have you noticed that the vast majority of opinions on every bodybuilding discussion board, including your very own prove otherwise.  Or are you just in denial and ksiing your boy Bob's ass, because maybe perhaps you have a little thing for him.  

Do you really think Bob won the show, fair and square?  If that is indeed the case, you're so full of shit that it's coming out of your eyes and rendering you blind, fatboy.

[slayer]

Ron wrote:

"You know - once again - I don't think 99% of the people who saw the show live and on the webcast would argue that Bob didn't win this show. He did, fair and square. No conspiracy - no favors from the IFBB - no favors from bodybuilding.com

He won the show, via a weak lineup, but still, he won the show fair and square. And it you cant get that into your heads, then you are just fooling yourselves.

And then he gives $1,000 special fan prize money to Shawn Ray's CHOC. For those of you who don't know what that is, it is Children's Hospital of Orange County. For the kids who really need it. Damn, now that was cool. A professional bodybuilding actually doing something good in the business.

But still, some of you think it is a ploy.

A conspiracy.

Now while I agree on some things, this obviously is not - and it makes some of you look real bad in thinking so.

Now - as for Rusty Jeffers - that is a whole different story - and many, many people agree that he should of been in the top 5, at least compared to some of the top guys there.

But that has nothing to do with Chick.

Milos once complained that there weren't enough comparisons. Since I wasnt at the show, do we have what the comparisons were for round 1 & 2???"

So you think 99% of the people agrred with the placing.  Have you noticed that the vast majority of opinions on every bodybuilding discussion board, including your very own prove otherwise.  Or are you just in denial and ksiing your boy Bob's ass, because maybe perhaps you have a little thing for him.  

Do you really think Bob won the show, fair and square?  If that is indeed the case, you're so full of shit that it's coming out of your eyes and rendering you blind, fatboy.

you have to admit ron is commical and adds entertainment value to the board with his little popins!

[LuciusFox]

Ron wrote:

"You know - once again - I don't think 99% of the people who saw the show live and on the webcast would argue that Bob didn't win this show. He did, fair and square. No conspiracy - no favors from the IFBB - no favors from bodybuilding.com

He won the show, via a weak lineup, but still, he won the show fair and square. And it you cant get that into your heads, then you are just fooling yourselves.

And then he gives $1,000 special fan prize money to Shawn Ray's CHOC. For those of you who don't know what that is, it is Children's Hospital of Orange County. For the kids who really need it. Damn, now that was cool. A professional bodybuilding actually doing something good in the business.

But still, some of you think it is a ploy.

A conspiracy.

Now while I agree on some things, this obviously is not - and it makes some of you look real bad in thinking so.

Now - as for Rusty Jeffers - that is a whole different story - and many, many people agree that he should of been in the top 5, at least compared to some of the top guys there.

But that has nothing to do with Chick.

Milos once complained that there weren't enough comparisons. Since I wasnt at the show, do we have what the comparisons were for round 1 & 2???"

So you think 99% of the people agrred with the placing.  Have you noticed that the vast majority of opinions on every bodybuilding discussion board, including your very own prove otherwise.  Or are you just in denial and ksiing your boy Bob's ass, because maybe perhaps you have a little thing for him.  

Do you really think Bob won the show, fair and square?  If that is indeed the case, you're so full of shit that it's coming out of your eyes and rendering you blind, fatboy.

 Another great post!

[arce377]

[ieffinhatecardio]

i gues he did expect fags like you to populate and become the main consumers of his images on those sites

Uh oh, your hero's image has been shattered.

What ever will you do?

Do you still believe in Santa Claus? The Toothfairy? The Easter Bunny?

[timfogarty]

i gues he did

you probably mean didn't

expect fags like you to populate

your probably mean propagate, however this fag and all the fags I know came from heterosexual parents

and become the main consumers of his images on those sites

Men are very visual, women generally are not.  Women consume very little porn, softcore or not.

Here is a hint:  the majority of the readers of Playgirl are gay guys.

[shiftedShapes]

Men are very visual, women generally are not.  Women consume very little porn, softcore or not.

Here is a hint:  the majority of the readers of Playgirl are gay guys.

You know this is the usual reason given for why women are less into porn but I think it probably has more to do with the fact that women just aren't that interested in sex for the most part.  They use sex instrumentally as a means to obtain love, companionship, and support for their offspring.  Do you agree Tim?

[LuciusFox]

you probably mean didn't

your probably mean propagate, however this fag and all the fags I know came from heterosexual parents

Men are very visual, women generally are not.  Women consume very little porn, softcore or not.

Here is a hint:  the majority of the readers of Playgirl are gay guys.

  Hahahaha...you owned that illiterate SOB

[timfogarty]

You know this is the usual reason given for why women are less into porn but I think it probably has more to do with the fact that women just aren't that interested in sex for the most part.  They use sex instrumentally as a means to obtain love, companionship, and support for their offspring.  Do you agree Tim?

Not exactly.  Women may be less into sex than males because with regards to evolution, there is a better chance of their genes being passed on if they have a limited number of children.   It's in the male's best interest to spread their genes as far and wide as possible.  Men are wired to be promiscuous, women are wired to be monogamous. Having visual stimulation as the trigger is a great way to have the males always ready to go.

Now, not all men are exactly the same, nor are all women.  I'm sure as with most any characteristic, the distribution is a bell curve, and there is some overlap between the genders.

Gay guys seem to be just as visiually oriented as straight guys.  And for those who think gay guys are too promiscuous, straight guys would be too if women weren't always saying no.

[punk_rockerX]

Now, not all men are exactly the same, nor are all women. 

ya think so einstein?  ...like most men like to stick it in a woman and you like to stick it in dudes shitter lmao

[LuciusFox]

Not exactly.  Women may be less into sex than males because with regards to evolution, there is a better chance of their genes being passed on if they have a limited number of children.   It's in the male's best interest to spread their genes as far and wide as possible.  Men are wired to be promiscuous, women are wired to be monogamous. Having visual stimulation as the trigger is a great way to have the males always ready to go.

Now, not all men are exactly the same, nor are all women.  I'm sure as with most any characteristic, the distribution is a bell curve, and there is some overlap between the genders.

Gay guys seem to be just as visiually oriented as straight guys.  And for those who think gay guys are too promiscuous, straight guys would be too if women weren't always saying no.

  And for those who think gay guys are too promiscuous, straight guys would be too if women weren't always saying no...I suspect that this is the truth. Historically, I think that gay bias was partly out of jealousy.