I hate the Microsoft browser BING, no offense to those that like the thing, and I couldn't figure out how to turn it off and use Google so out of frustration I typed "I hate Bing" into Google search to find people like me. The top hit came back an article on "Why I ditched Google for Bing". It was not listed as an advertisement and is the default hit promoting Bing. I thought Google competed with Bing so I investigated.
I realize now that the first hit is spam I guess but it was not listed as such, and some elderly person(and me) would never know that,
https://www.wired.com/story/tried-bing-search-google-microsoft/ The article was written by Wired, which is part of Linkedin, which Bill Gates purchased,so Wired is a propaganda machine for Microsoft. Conde Nast owns Wired, and Microsoft owns Conde Nast. The chief editor of Wired.com is Nicholas Thompson, a Microsoft employee. In fact when I just typed in "Bing Search engine" in Google, the first hits were always praising Bing, despite an algorithm that is supposedly used. All of the other "objective" initial hits were by sites like zdnet, with CEO Andrew J. Brust who was Microsoft regional director. Or Medium.com with CEO Evan Williams who is director of Microsoft, Australia. All those weird little hits are Microsoft executives or related to MSFT yet are presented as legitimate articles on Bing vs. Google browser.
Microsoft essentially owns Google through a company called Alphabet Techology(GOOG). Alphabet is a "holding company", with a mysterious web of holdings, Google being one.
Sunday Pichai became CEO of Alphabet(GOOG), yet he was up for CEO of Microsoft n 2014. Satya Nadella, another Indian, is now CEO of Microsoft. This gets to the Indian connection and vaccine corruption.
Satya Nadella, India and the WHO was integral in allowing Bill Gates to do his polio vaccine testing, as well as HPV and other vaccine testing in India. Gates, the Indian Government and Saudi Prince Alwaleed essentially own the World Health Orgainization, with Gates and Alwaleed being the biggest private citizen investors in the WHO. A rare independent article said
Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate Polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI) which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously. The death of girls who were a part of a Human Papilloma Virus vaccine trial has raised an alarm about the nature of research in India as well as the value attached by the state to the lives of its citizens.
A trial was being conducted in Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat by the NGO PATH with support from the Indian Council of Medical Research and local health authorities. They were funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The vaccine is supplied by two companies, Merck Sharpe & Dohme and Glaxo Smith Kline.
When the government stopped the trials, three doses had already been administered to 30,000 participants, mostly tribal girls aged between 9 and 14.
The union health minister, Ghulam Nabi Azad, has denied that the deaths have anything to do with the trials, and as things stand, there is no conclusive evidence of a causal link between the vaccine and the deaths. But the fact that the girls were a part of the trial is reason enough to warrant further investigations.
A committee has been constituted by the union government to investigate the deaths. Further action will depend on the report of the committee.
An investigation in one of the sites in AP, coordinated by the women’s health group SAMA, revealed that the trials recruited tribal girls from poor areas. These girls were malnourished. To worsen the situation, consent forms for the trial are in English which even the health care provider administering the vaccine to them may not be able to read, let alone the participants.I am
NOT claiming this is true, but you will find NO objective articles through a google search, as ANY search regarding Microsoft, Bing or vaccines about Gates will all be those bullshit sites run by someone with a connection to Microsoft, despite the "algorithm", that is supposed to be objective.
Truth is Bill Gates has ownership of nearly all articles you will read about Microsoft, both through his purchase of Linkedin and the various web companies they own. There is no chance of an independent search on Google about anything Microsoft because Google is a figurehead company owned by Alphabet(GOOG). Evan Williams, for example, who lead Microsoft Australia also "came up" with Twitter, and now Gates is a big investor in Twitter.
I was only trying to find "I hate Bing" and realized Google Search is a Microsoft puppet.
I'm sure many of you have already made these connections, but this was new to me.
Notomorrow
Yeah it's a long post so what?
