Photograph appears to show BLM rep kneeling on the neck of a white -- BABY!

[Tapeworm]

They're so soft tho. It's like sitting on cotton candy made out of helium.

[Soul Crusher]

Unbelievable

Brian Papin, A Special Education Teacher At Cedar Grove High School In Atlanta, Suggests Killing White Toddler In Viral Photo


https://www.nationalistreview.net/2020/07/22/special-education-teacher-encourages-black-lives-matter-to-kill-white-toddler/

[tommywishbone]

Leave them alone. They will go extinct. Evolution will take care of them.

Whenever a species fails to provide food and shelter for their offspring that species will become extinct. 

Evolution is never wrong and it never loses.

[robcguns]

Man just destroyed his career.

Did he really though?Its black on white which is fully acceptable it seems,no?

[Hypertrophy]

Lever them alone. They will go extinct. Evolution will take care of them.

Whenever a species fails to provide food and shelter for their offspring that species will become extinct.  Evolution is never wrong and it never loses.

Right you are Tommy!

[chaos]

The teacher resigned today. Is that satisfactory?

[Skeletor]

The teacher resigned today.

Probably resigned so he wouldn't be fired, like cops who then proceed to work for another department.

Is that satisfactory?

No.

[Tapeworm]

The teacher resigned today. Is that satisfactory?

Not if it's the result of pressure. 1, the guy was just making a wiseass comment, not actually giving directions on how to kill a baby. 2, it's none of an employer's business what you do, say, or think outside of work. 9-5, I'm ya guy. 5:01-8:59, you're deaf blind. Don't eavesdrop on your workers.

No cancel culture means people get to say things I might not like, which is how it should be.

[Dave D]

Not if it's the result of pressure. 1, the guy was just making a wiseass comment, not actually giving directions on how to kill a baby. 2, it's none of an employer's business what you do, say, or think outside of work. 9-5, I'm ya guy. 5:01-8:59, you're deaf blind. Don't eavesdrop on your workers.

No cancel culture means people get to say things I might not like, which is how it should be.

1. If thats the case its ok to make racial and sexist jokes.

2. Its not 1950 anymore, if you work in the public sector, lets say as a special education teacher, your actions outside of work do matter.

If you're working the drive thru at McDonald's you're playing by a whole different set of rules.

[Walter Sobchak]

Not if it's the result of pressure. 1, the guy was just making a wiseass comment, not actually giving directions on how to kill a baby. 2, it's none of an employer's business what you do, say, or think outside of work. 9-5, I'm ya guy. 5:01-8:59, you're deaf blind. Don't eavesdrop on your workers.

No cancel culture means people get to say things I might not like, which is how it should be.

People just don’t seem to grasp that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from repercussions.

[Tapeworm]

1. If thats the case its ok to make racial and sexist jokes.

2. Its not 1950 anymore, if you work in the public sector, lets say as a special education teacher, your actions outside of work do matter.

If you're working the drive thru at McDonald's you're playing by a whole different set of rules.

It is ok. A joke should hit or miss on its merit, not be banished from existence because of feelings.

[Tapeworm]

People just don’t seem to grasp that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from repercussions.

How about freedom from being spied on by your employer? I'm amazed a right wing guy would argue that an individual's rights should take a backseat to an organizan's rights. How about you can't say 'master bedroom,' have to piss in a cup daily, submit full fingerprints and dna, and have our microchip implanted in you in order to work here? Hey, you're free not to and just face the consequences.



"...doesn't reflect our values." They always say.

Values which include being fine with monitoring people's communications outside of work and establishing themselves as the authority on which opinions are unacceptable.

Have a shitty physique because you choose to eat poorly and never work out is a consequence. Being eaten by a bear while trying to selfie with it is a consequence. That's different than an imposed consequence, where another human made a decision. In that instance, a balance has to be struck between his right to impose that consequence on you and your right not to be imposed upon. Now, there are things which happen at work and things which don't happen at work, and that strikes me as a natural boundary between the employer's authority and the individual's rights.

I'd love to hear a conservative arguement in favor of reducing an individual's rights for the benefit of the company, the country, or any group. Then I'll know the world is upside down.

[El Diablo Blanco]

Not if it's the result of pressure. 1, the guy was just making a wiseass comment, not actually giving directions on how to kill a baby. 2, it's none of an employer's business what you do, say, or think outside of work. 9-5, I'm ya guy. 5:01-8:59, you're deaf blind. Don't eavesdrop on your workers.

No cancel culture means people get to say things I might not like, which is how it should be.

It is 100% your employers business. When you work at a company you are representing them 24/7.  They are  paying you money.  People that embarrass themselves and their company deserve to be fire.

[Dave D]

How about freedom from being spied on by your employer? I'm amazed a right wing guy would argue that an individual's rights should take a backseat to an organizan's rights. How about you can't say 'master bedroom,' have to piss in a cup daily, submit full fingerprints and dna, and have our microchip implanted in you in order to work here? Hey, you're free not to and just face the consequences.



"...doesn't reflect our values." They always say.

Values which include being fine with monitoring people's communications outside of work and establishing themselves as the authority on which opinions are unacceptable.

Have a shitty physique because you choose to eat poorly and never work out is a consequence. Being eaten by a bear while trying to selfie with it is a consequence. That's different than an imposed consequence, where another human made a decision. In that instance, a balance has to be struck between his right to impose that consequence on you and your right not to be imposed upon. Now, there are things which happen at work and things which don't happen at work, and that strikes me as a natural boundary between the employer's authority and the individual's rights.

I'd love to hear a conservative arguement in favor of reducing an individual's rights for the benefit of the company, the country, or any group. Then I'll know the world is upside down.

Why do you post here as Tapeworm then?

Why not just use your real name?

Do you post the same things on your social media accounts that you post on Getbig?

Has there ever been a time in America when a teacher could hang a Nazi flag in their yard and pontificate on the positive virtues of the Nazi party?

Did you know in the 50's you couldnt publicly support the communist party? You could be arrested for communist talk, freedom of speech has been censored for years.

[joswift]

It is 100% your employers business. When you work at a company you are representing them 24/7.  They are  paying you money.  People that embarrass themselves and their company deserve to be fire.

they pay you for the hours you work, if they pay you 24/7 then they may have an argument to police you outside work

While at work you agree to follow their rules.

that said I am aware that most companies will dismiss an employee for any of the crimes of racism , sexism, homophobia, transphobia.

They are more likely to keep your job open if you kill someone

[Dave D]

they pay you for the hours you work, if they pay you 24/7 then they may have an argument to police you outside work

While at work you agree to follow their rules.

that said I am aware that most companies will dismiss an employee for any of the crimes of racism , sexism, homophobia, transphobia.

They are more likely to keep your job open if you kill someone

This.

The NFL has employed men who have killed others when drinking and driving. 

[Walter Sobchak]

How about freedom from being spied on by your employer? I'm amazed a right wing guy would argue that an individual's rights should take a backseat to an organizan's rights. How about you can't say 'master bedroom,' have to piss in a cup daily, submit full fingerprints and dna, and have our microchip implanted in you in order to work here? Hey, you're free not to and just face the consequences.



"...doesn't reflect our values." They always say.

Values which include being fine with monitoring people's communications outside of work and establishing themselves as the authority on which opinions are unacceptable.

Have a shitty physique because you choose to eat poorly and never work out is a consequence. Being eaten by a bear while trying to selfie with it is a consequence. That's different than an imposed consequence, where another human made a decision. In that instance, a balance has to be struck between his right to impose that consequence on you and your right not to be imposed upon. Now, there are things which happen at work and things which don't happen at work, and that strikes me as a natural boundary between the employer's authority and the individual's rights.

I'd love to hear a conservative arguement in favor of reducing an individual's rights for the benefit of the company, the country, or any group. Then I'll know the world is upside down.

Businesses spend an immeasurable amount of time and money to build their reputation, goodwill, and positive company culture. You’d be ignorant to think that they are only going to protect them from 9:00 - 5:00. Your behavior outside of work, especially on social media, can directly affect your company and is considered a reflection of your company’s policies, if you’re an employee.

When STUPID people post STUPID things on social media they make it public for the world to see...you will never convince anyone that reading those public posts constitutes spying.

Your ridiculous drivel about a microchip implant is fucking retarded and a red herring away from the original topic being discussed.

[chaos]

Not if it's the result of pressure. 1, the guy was just making a wiseass comment, not actually giving directions on how to kill a baby. 2, it's none of an employer's business what you do, say, or think outside of work. 9-5, I'm ya guy. 5:01-8:59, you're deaf blind. Don't eavesdrop on your workers.

No cancel culture means people get to say things I might not like, which is how it should be.

1) Did you read his post? He specifically gave instructions on how to kill the baby.
2) Normally I would agree, however this piece of shit works with special needs kids. If he's advocating child abuse publicly, what kind of fuckery is he doing behind closed doors?
3) The left has had so many people fired or run their businesses out of business because they don't agree with leftist ideology I can't feel bad when someone like this gets blasted.

[joswift]

this doctor lost his job for saying men and women were different biologically

[Tapeworm]

I think you guys are wrapped up in the particulars of this case and missing the broader issue. That people shouldn't get canceled for expressing unsanctioned views. Next time someone gets witchhunted for saying there are biological differences between the sexes or that there is no evidence of systemic racism, you'll likely be making an anti-cancel argument, which is going to ring real hollow if you've made a pro-cancel case in the past.

If I was gonna foilhat, it'd be "How do I get people to agree with the socialist position that individual rights can be curtailed any time it serves the collective good?"  Well, lets present them with cases which cause them to argue in favor of doing that. Like this black guy. And let's hotbutton it. Let's make children victims. That'll really pull their strings.

Just understand what you're signing off on here.

[chaos]

I think you guys are wrapped up in the particulars of this case and missing the broader issue. That people shouldn't get canceled for expressing unsanctioned views. Next time someone gets witchhunted for saying there are biological differences between the sexes or that there is no evidence of systemic racism, you'll likely be making an anti-cancel argument, which is going to ring real hollow if you've made a pro-cancel case in the past.

If I was gonna foilhat, it'd be "How do I get people to agree with the socialist position that individual rights can be curtailed any time it serves the collective good?"  Well, lets present them with cases which cause them to argue in favor of doing that. Like this black guy. And let's hotbutton it. Let's make children victims. That'll really pull their strings.

Just understand what you're signing off on here.

You weren't yammering on about it when it was happening to conservatives. Suddenly you care?

[Tapeworm]

You weren't yammering on about it when it was happening to conservatives. Suddenly you care?

Huh. I just clearly stated that people shouldn't get canceled for traditional right wing views like the biological sex thing. I even called it a witchhunt. Is the right seeking to alienate people with impossible standards to the same degree the rabid left does?

You're not gonna sell me on a team ideology. Dispassionately reasoning through issues, and understanding the principles being endorsed takes more work but it's got its benefits. Namely that you have well considered reasons of your own for your beliefs, rather than "Our side right, their side wrong." Right. But why?

So craft a case for canceling this guy but not canceling Rowling, and define for me principles, if any, which you extract from that. I'll honestly consider it and not just blindly insist I'm right. Because I'm not a team guy, I'm willing to hear other points of view and mull over their merits rather than just cancel them out of hand.

[Tapeworm]

Light bulbs going on over heads. "Omg I've been arguing in favor of canceling someone because I found what he said offensive."

It's ok. You don't have to admit it.

[Dave D]

Light bulbs going on over heads. "Omg I've been arguing in favor of canceling someone because I found what he said offensive."

It's ok. You don't have to admit it.

Dude you're arguing that a special education teacher in the PUBLIC sector should be allowed to point out the correct way to murder a baby?

Would you also be okay, under the guise of freedom of speech, if the same individual commented on how sexy 4 year olds are or how easy it is to hook up with special needs students?

You give up certain freedoms with specific jobs, especially when you're in the public sector, look no further than racist cops for example....

I understand what you're saying but your point is 30 years to late.

We dont have freedom of speech. We dont have it online. We dont have it in the press. We dont have it in our neighborhoods.

You sound like the guys who say, "If blacks dont like it here give  them a free ticket to Africa." The country and culture have drastically changed from when the constitution was written.

Marge Schott lost her MLB team because of her COMMENTS in the early 90s. So dont act like this is all new and a loss of personal rights. Bill Watts was fired from his job at Turner Broadcasting in 92 for comments. Jimmy The Greek said look at that monkey run, guess what happened.

This has been going on for decades.

[Tapeworm]

My litmus test is that 98% of this board would be out of a job if we apply these rules, and that can't be right. Unless there's an explicit statement of intention to commit violence which is criminally actionable, like Weeping China Doll did, then anything goes and people who are not your intended audience can just butt out, including your employer and the owner of Twitter.

I don't agree the discussion is late because this isn't an occasional celeb in the public eye putting out a one way statement on an indiscriminate broadcast. Every week now it's Joe Blow interacting online, maybe he mispeaks, maybe he's a jackass, someone takes offence, and he's fired or banned or canceled in some way. Instead of following the Left's playbook, the Right would do well to take the high road. Let discussions proceed and may the best ideas prevail. If we don't put the brakes on cancel culture then the internet is dead.

Eggshell walking is no solution once the Feelings Police are in charge. Anything which befalls you is then fine, even complete ruination over some lamebrained notion you once shared, because you should have known better than to express an unsanctioned idea. That pit has no bottom.