I don't understand why he finds it offensive to recieve e-mails from gays, when he poses for a gay site?
I think Gustavo might have been counting on the fact that few people knew he posed for musclegallery and, perhaps, was hoping that no evidence of it existed.
His page on musclegallery.com was removed a looong time ago so unless you saw it back in the day you would never know about it . . .
Similar nonsense came out of Mark Dugdale’s camp last year. In a thread on Christian hypocrisy someone asked why Mark “the Christian” Dugdale would pose for what is basically a gay porn/erotica site like musclegallery.com. One of his friends/defenders here (I think it was Matt C) claimed that Dugdale didn’t realize what musclegallery.com was and thought he was just going for a regular photo shoot.
“Honestly, I had no idea I was posing nearly nude for gay men when I signed that contract."
Yeah right.

Obviously, I have no problem with anyone posing for musclegallery, or any other venue, but why do it and then act surprised by the consequences?