Author Topic: then and now (Read 524024 times)

Humble Narcissist · « **Reply #3001 on:** July 22, 2024, 11:34:45 PM »

^^^ Damn, she still looks good.

funk51 · « **Reply #3002 on:** July 25, 2024, 06:21:38 AM »

njflex · « **Reply #3003 on:** July 25, 2024, 08:20:55 AM »

Quote from: falco on July 22, 2024, 01:51:37 AM

they look good together, he looks better now he looked old then 'dundee'she looks great good surgeon,she had pretty face to start with and maintain.

falco · « **Reply #3004 on:** July 25, 2024, 02:03:43 PM »

Quote from: njflex on July 25, 2024, 08:20:55 AM

they look good together, he looks better now he looked old then 'dundee'she looks great good surgeon,she had pretty face to start with and maintain.

She is s bit chunky now.

Humble Narcissist · « **Reply #3005 on:** July 26, 2024, 12:22:59 AM »

Salma Hayek still looks luscious.

funk51 · « **Reply #3006 on:** August 10, 2024, 05:01:15 AM »

oldtimer1 · « **Reply #3007 on:** August 10, 2024, 06:38:47 AM »

Quote from: funk51 on August 10, 2024, 05:01:15 AM

The tracks are better. More springy. They also use a carbon fiber plate in their shoes. You would have to compare them on the same type track. Sir Roger broke the 4 minute mile on a dirt cinder track. If he ran it on today's track it would have been over 10 seconds faster.

Humble Narcissist · « **Reply #3008 on:** August 10, 2024, 11:55:40 PM »

Quote from: oldtimer1 on August 10, 2024, 06:38:47 AM

The tracks are better. More springy. They also use a carbon fiber plate in their shoes. You would have to compare them on the same type track. Sir Roger broke the 4 minute mile on a dirt cinder track. If he ran it on today's track it would have been over 10 seconds faster.

Plus the "supplementation" is better.

Hulkotron · « **Reply #3009 on:** August 12, 2024, 08:05:09 AM »

First place in '88 was actually 9.79.

Humble Narcissist · « **Reply #3010 on:** August 13, 2024, 12:00:01 AM »

Quote from: Hulkotron on August 12, 2024, 08:05:09 AM

First place in '88 was actually 9.79.

What is 1st now?

joswift · « **Reply #3011 on:** August 13, 2024, 12:05:11 AM »

Quote from: Humble Narcissist on August 13, 2024, 12:00:01 AM

What is 1st now?

WR is 9.58

1st at the O this year 9.79

Bolt would have beaten them all by 2 m

Humble Narcissist · « **Reply #3012 on:** August 13, 2024, 12:51:18 AM »

Quote from: joswift on August 13, 2024, 12:05:11 AM

WR is 9.58

1st at the O this year 9.79

Bolt would have beaten them all by 2 m

Bolt may have that record for a while.

joswift · « **Reply #3013 on:** August 13, 2024, 01:03:13 AM »

Quote from: Humble Narcissist on August 13, 2024, 12:51:18 AM

Bolt may have that record for a while.

he had a rare combination of speed and height (stride length)
Some of his competition were faster in the fact they took more strides than him (Yohan Blake) but him covering more ground with his put him in front