Philly Riots

[funk51]

Some great leftist propaganda there.  The Demonrats who run things now run everything into the ground.  They don't do anything about rioters and looters until it reaches their immediate neighborhood... scumbags.

I was here back then too and I remember that time.  The city was much safer... police did their jobs... crime was much lower.  As long as you were obeying the law, you had no problem at all.  Violent criminal animals deserved to get their heads beat in.  God bless Frank Rizzo.

                   I agree , now they have to hide his statue. it's a shame, he and his brother joseph were real men.

[Megalodon]

                   I agree , now they have to hide his statue. it's a shame, he and his brother joseph were real men.

The Vice hit piece's racist Bolshevik author and his racist Bolshevik source doing their hatred against Italians thing.



Larry Krasner

[Kwon]

                   I agree , now they have to hide his statue. it's a shame, he and his brother joseph were real men.

What is the value of a Backbody?

[oldgolds]

Some great leftist propaganda there.  The Demonrats who run things now run everything into the ground.  They don't do anything about rioters and looters until it reaches their immediate neighborhood... scumbags.

I was here back then too and I remember that time.  The city was much safer... police did their jobs... crime was much lower.  As long as you were obeying the law, you had no problem at all.  Violent criminal animals deserved to get their heads beat in.  God bless Frank Rizzo.

Agree...I'm from Philly and the city was much nicer and more livable under Rizzo. Then the Democrats took over and now it's a toilet. Everything the Dems touch turns to shit.

[BB]

                   I agree , now they have to hide his statue. it's a shame, he and his brother joseph were real men.

.

( long version - www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HWHhev-aag ).

.

That first video is awesome.

[funk51]

Agree...I'm from Philly and the city was much nicer and more livable under Rizzo. Then the Democrats took over and now it's a toilet. Everything the Dems touch turns to shit.

did you ever hear of or go to fritsche's gym or the holy savior barbell club in norristown.

[SOMEPARTS]

did you ring the liberty bell before it cracked?

 

[oldgolds]

did you ever hear of or go to fritsche's gym or the holy savior barbell club in norristown.

Heard of Fritche's, never went there. I think Ken Covington trained there. I trained at gyms in Ambler, Jenkintown, Line Lexington and one on Cottman ave.

[Coach is Back!]

Havent seen much by the Libturd media reporting on the horrific violent rioting in Philly??

Why is it that more white people are killed by cops, but zero riots when they are killed? Media fueled and approved rioting??

https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2020/10/28/philadelphia-protest-riot-looting-aramingo-avenue-port-richmond-continues-2nd-night-fatal-police-shooting-walter-wallace/

Dem ran city

[Kwon]

Will we see an event like this again?

[Earl1972]

Nobody even needs statistics to know black people are more aggressive and violent.  Just go to the mall or any public place with a bunch of black people and you can see for yourself what they are like.

yep they shut down the mall i always went to back in the 80's and 90's, it was one of the biggest malls in the country

there used to be muggings in the parking lot and they tried to keep that out of the local news, but of course people talk when things like that happen

all they had to do was stop sending a bus to their communities and the mall might still be in business, it's not like that would've cost them money because most would just go to the mall to loiter,  but taking away that bus route would've been "racist"

E

[Mr Anabolic]

This POS mayor Kenney needs to GO!

------------------------------------------------------
Philly City Council Strips Cops Of Rubber Bullets, Tear Gas After Dozens Wounded In Street Violence

Philadelphia City Council approved legislation, 14-3 vote, that prohibits law enforcement officers from using "less-lethal munitions," such as rubber bullets, tear gas, and pepper spray on demonstrators.

The vote comes days after social unrest was sparked in the City of Brotherly Love - over the police shooting of Walter Wallace Jr., and days before the Nov. 03 presidential elections. The legislation is expected to be signed momentarily by Democratic Mayor Jim Kenney, who is trying to appease local constituents/demonstrators.

Councilmember Helen Gym, the bill's prime sponsor, said, "in banning the police use of less-lethal munitions in response to demonstrations, we are answering the calls of our constituents."

Gym continued: "This is a moment where repairing trust between our residents, public officials, and police are essential. Residential neighborhoods are not warzones. Demonstrators are not enemy combatants. This is a first step in working with our communities to build a new model for public safety that is driven by their needs and their vision for the future."

While most councilmembers support the bill, three councilmembers, including Republican Councilmembers David Oh and Brian J. O'Neill, along with Democrat Bobby Henon, voted against it. Their opposition stemmed from what they said would be the "chilling effects" of police officers not having the right tools to enforce public safety.

Philadelphia Mayor's Office released an update Thursday of the overall situation in the metro area. At least 11 ATMs were blown up across town, 57 police officers injured, and over 212 felony or misdemeanors arrests.

Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf was quick to deploy the Pennsylvania National Guard on Tuesday with mandatory curfews on Wednesday.

Readers may recall, other Democratic cities banned "less-than-lethal" weapons earlier this year, following the George Floyd protests. 

Seattle City Council voted unanimously to ban police from chokeholds, tear gas, pepper spray, and other crowd-control weapons in June.

This is another example of pandering urban Democrats, placing their political interest above police officers' health and safety and the community they are supposed to be protecting.

Also, suppose officers, barred from carrying "less-lethal munitions," what happens when they're forced into a situation where they have no alternative in firing their service weapon?

[Kwon]

Nobody even needs statistics to know black people are more aggressive and violent.  Just go to the mall or any public place with a bunch of black people and you can see for yourself what they are like.

This


No impulse control either.

[Body-Buildah]

Libturdz and BLM made a felon, 'pregnant woman robbing/molesting' drug-using criminal, into a symbol of the party.

Really brain-dead retardz these libKuntz. 

George "Pink" Floyd - Dark Side of the Koon.

[IroNat]

Nothing to see here, just peaceful demonstrations.  Move along.

[Ronnie Rep]

The bomb blew up, but it burned many houses with it.  All connected row homes.  I was at work and watched this live on the news as it was happening.   The person who authorized all of this was mayor Wilson Goode... he was black.

What these vids do not mention is that the MOVE members were shooting at police with AR's and AK's.  They were given weeks to surrender and come out of there... they did not.

Yup remember it well. Ever been in the back of on those paddywagons I have.

[irishdave]

Yup remember it well. Ever been in the back of on those paddywagons I have.

Paddy wagon is a xenophobic term. Derogatory towards Irish. Take that back I am
Offended!!


Said no Irish person ever

[Body-Buildah]

 

[Body-Buildah]

Demturdz 

[Body-Buildah]

water-heads of the western-world. 

[Body-Buildah]

Brain-dead retard risking kids life to teach hate. Foolish kunt.

[Body-Buildah]

A shit-hole of a violent (black) city.

[Body-Buildah]

Thread of violence and mayhem can just go on forever. Demtards and BLM are the enemy. No brain-cells present though.
So dumb they think destroying a great country is a good thing.

Spray 'em w/ bullets, take out the vile kuntz.

[wes]

Not only that, 93% of Black murder victims are murdered by other Blacks, where only 0.77% of Black people killed by White people, and that includes all of the shootings of armed Black men shot by the police.  I suspect that probably 90% of those deaths of Black people by White people are probably in self-defense.

So for the Jewish-controlled media to assert that White people are somehow hunting down and shooting or killing innocent Black men is just straight up absurd.  It's not only a lie - it's the complete opposite of the truth, given that White people are overwhelmingly targeted, attacked, and killed by Black people than the number of Blacks killed by Whites.

The Jewish-controlled media is pushing a narrative that is literally delusional.

Look at the first chart to see just how delusional it is to talk about Black people killed by White people, lol!  It's like a full cultural movement/revolution complaining about women raping men.  ANY sane person should be like "Are the people promoting this stuff INSANE?"  White people are OVERWHELMINGLY targeted more by Black people than the reverse!  It's not even close!  It's not even comparable!  It IS, as said, like saying that women commit most rapes and sexual assaults, and that men are the victims.  It just blows my mind that there are ANY White people who still possibly support this, as if spending 7 seconds online searching for the information below is too much work for them.

As for the second attached image - just because a Black person is "unarmed" doesn't mean that the police shooting that they were involved in wasn't completely justifiable.  The reality of the matter is that Black people attack or otherwise pose a threat to the safety of police officers without necessarily being armed with a weapon.  And Indigenous former friend of mine got arrested - and convicted - of committing armed robbery at a pharmacy because he pulled his shirt sleeve up and pretended that he had a hidden weapon under his sleeve.  So he was convicted of armed robbery for literally using his arm as a weapon.

But you will NEVER hear the Jewish-controlled media in the West say any of this, or EVER put these cases in context, because the ONLY agenda they are interested in promoting/advancing is that White people are evil and the scourge of the earth, and are the singular [and only] cause of all the suffering of non-White races.

Even if that complete BULL was true, it begs the question: WHY DO NON-WHITE PEOPLE KEEP STREAMING INTO WHITE/WESTERN COUNTRIES BY THE MILLIONS EACH YEAR, LITERALLY RISKING THEIR LIVES IN THE PROCESS IN SOME CASES?  WHY do these people want to live AWAY - far, FAR away - from their own race, but live in the countries that have the highest concentration of White people present?

That is exactly the OPPOSITE of what the Jewish-controlled media is suggesting - according to the narratives they support and advance, White people are EVIL, and "oppress" non-Whites, and if that WERE true, then they should be promoting repatriating those non-White people back to the ancestral homelands, where THEIR races are in the majority, and where THEIR races sustain the institutions in those nations, including law enforcement, so that the innocent and perfect and glorious "people of colour" who can do no wrong, and are only the victims of the evil racism of all the rotten White people won't have to ever experience the evil rotten "racism" of White people, who somehow "oppress" them.  That way, they can live far away from White people, and no longer have to face all the "oppression" that White people bring to their lives.

After all, wouldn't THAT be the humane thing to do?

But NOPE - the Jewish-controlled media keeps INSISTING on flooding White countries and only White countries with endless waves of non-White immigration, so that each passing 3-5 years, we see an even GREATER number of non-Whites wishing to overthrow the current socioeconomic and political status quo, and do everything they can to ensure that White people are pushing into extreme minority status to the point where Whites will be in the single digit percentage of current White/Western societies by 2150.

Gee, it's almost like maybe that's the point or something. 

Of course by then, Western society will look like a developing country, and non-Whites will have even WORSE lives being in a majority non-White country, just the way that non-Whites CURRENLY have worse lives when they live in majority non-White countries compared to the much higher quality of life, access to healthcare, access to education, access to social services, and stronger and less corrupt institutions to serve their interests and allow them to a much greater chance of achieving fair justice if they are ever on the wrong side of the law, and much better chance of preserving and maintaining their physical safety in White societies than they would have in their own societies.

And yet White people are never allowed to directly VOTE on whether or not we want these endless streams of non-White immigration to continue, as White people are accused of all problems facing non-White people, to do something to push back on the increasingly violent and increasingly unstable nature of the USA and Western society in general because of this endless immigration, and the fact that non-Whites are blamed for every woe facing non-Whites, and the ethnic aliens who control our media continue to agitate, to make as many non-Whites hate Whites as possible and want to accelerate their demographic decline, while increasing mass immigration of non-White people into the USA and other White/Western societies at the highest rate possibles.

And they seriously expect that nothing will give, and that this agitation isn't getting so far out of hand, as if White people are supposed to let a one-sided race war go on and do absolutely nothing to fight back.

I'm sorry, but screw that.  And it makes me happy to see so many strongly identified White males on Getbig who have NO FEAR in saying that, and standing up for their unique ethnic and racial interests, and aren't afraid of a word - "racist" - being used to shout them down.  As if not being called "racist" is somehow better for White people overall than seeing multiple Democrat cities burnt to the ground, and billions of dollars of property damage ensue.

I am confident that will see an inflection point between now and 2030 where White people just collectively stop caring completely, no matter WHAT we are caused, and that the small minority of vocal "anti-racist" social justice Whites who try to keep the rest of us in line by guilt - and by attempting to destroy our personal economies by having us fired from our jobs - will grow even smaller, and will simply be completely ignored.  At that point, I think they will realize that they have to make the choice of supporting their in-group [White people], or being on the side of the hodgepodge of "Oppression Olympics [Everyone Gets a Trophy]" welfare-grabbers who want nothing but endless amounts of free stuff, and who DO NOT care how "anti-racist" a White person is, because they - masses of them - think that White people are irredeemably racist, and don't want them on their side, regardless of how "anti-racist" they claim to be, or how much they "denounce their White Privilege", and blame White people for all of the problems facing Black people.

At that point, which I'm sure will happen by 2030 or, say, between 2030 to 2040 at the very latest, is when we will see White people band together as a group, not just in the USA, but throughout ALL of Western civilization, which will make it impossible for anyone to stop White people for standing up for their collective racial interests.  Then it will be the most dominant race that ultimately ends up winning the ensuing riots/conflicts, or even race war or full-on civil war that ensues.

I don't want it to come to that, but what is the alternative?  Are we supposed to change the laws that allow Black people to legally shoot at the police, and make it illegal for police officers to match lethal force with lethal force?  Or should we allow Black men [like Rayshard Brooks, from Georgia] to pass out drunk in a Wendy's drive-thru and to punch out one cop, and to steal one of their tasers and shoot it at the head/face of the other cop [luckily, he missed], and for the police officer to shoot him in defense, when faced with lethal force, only for him to get fired for doing so??  Is THAT what the Black Lives Matter movement wants to change the law to, basically allowing Black men to get away with anything and everything, with any response or arrest being classified as "racist", and resulting in the police officers getting fired, for simply doing their jobs or, in some of these cases, literally defending themselves with lethal force, when facing lethal force?

I would LOVE for any of the BLM supporters to tell exactly what they expect society to tolerate from Black criminals in their brave new world.  But...I think I already know.  And I REFUSE to accept that.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out, and to see how long it takes before White people put their feet down, and makes mass-arrests of Black criminals and other criminals of the BLM movement.  Conversely...well...I don't even want to know what will happen if law enforcement doesn't put a stop to these degradation, violent decay, and filth.

[Body-Buildah]

Demturdz "Lets let them keep peacefully rioting". 

Dumb fukkz.