Hahahaha....k. You and your speculations when there’s over 200k of them. But let’s take the affidavits that actually delivered expert testimonies such as attorneys, data scientists, computer forensic scientists, etc etc etc that perfectly understood the seriousness of signing an affidavit under penalty of perjury (look that up, I don’t think you understand that part) that you didn’t bother to watch when me about 20 others posted on here.
Fake?
You mean people like "Spider", the "cybersecurity expert from the 305" (a
beginner's training outfit) who ended up washing out of training, but was passed around like an expert on elections?
Or people like Melissa Carone, the part-time temp with a wast-nest for a hairdo and the attitude of a spoiled teenager with a stuffed nose and chews gum like she's some kind of ruminant animal, who has no background on election security but has
all the super-duper-secrets "because, like, I like, worked for, like, Dominion, k and I signed like a thing, yeah?"
Even if you ignore the obviously false claims made by Rudy and Sydney and that troupe of legandary losers, both in and out of the Courts, and focus only on the affidavits the simple fact is that they
so strain credulity, that they may as well attest to Santa Claus being real.
The simple fact, Joe, is that you're just a human mouthpiece, and not a very good one at that: you ingest whatever comes out of talk radio but are unable to articulate it back in a cogent way, much less argue the points. You just chew on whatever you're fed, then regurgitate the cud out.
