You only win in this country when a court says you are the winner of whatever dispute you are involved in.
Your side is doing terribly in the winning department.
Democrats are only winning because they are importing millions of non-Whites each year, who disproportionately sit on welfare, and obviously vote Democrat. It's been said lately on Twitter that "Black women saved Democracy again."
LMAO...yeah, because countries with large numbers of Black women are sooo successful, right?
REALITY: Black women are the most government-dependent class in the USA, so OBVIOUSLY they vote for the party that gives the most handouts. How is that "saving democracy"? How about let's compare cities and states with the most Black women, versus cities and states with the most White women, and see which one is more successful, haha. Somalia, Uganda, Tanzania, Nigeria...these places should all be paradises if Black women are so great at making countries fair and democratic.
It's literally hilarious to me that people are considered progressive just because they sit on welfare, and vote Democrat solely for that reason. And if you think such a model is good in the long-term, just wait and see how the USA looks when you reach a population of 450 million people, bringing in another 120 million welfare-grabbers into the country.
And that's the ONLY reason Democrats are winning and will continue to win - because they are importing people who sit on welfare, and vote solely on the basis of what party gives more welfare handouts.
All well and good until you run out of money. I suppose you haven't thought about THAT yet though, have you?
Lastly, Primemuscle posted that one judge said that Trump's example of electoral fraud was equivalent to "Frankenstein's Monster" in legal terms.
Uhh...ok, SO WHAT'S THE ARGUMENT SHE'S MAKING? ALL I have seen are judges just ignoring examples of electoral fraud without even saying why.
Why don't you post examples of electoral fraud claims being refuted on the basis of EVIDENCE, to see how they hold up? I have yet to see ONE example of a claim of electoral fraud that was legitimately dismissed based on evidence.
Even the recent case in Georgia - it was estimated that 30,000 votes for Trump were lost or destroyed, and Trump said he simply needed to find 11,780. A fraction of the number of votes for him which were destroyed. And the REPUBLICAN governor of that state simply ignored his request. What does it tell you about a system where supposed "Republicans" are trying their best to prevent a Republican presidency? It's one thing to say a two party system is bad - but the USA now clearly has a ONE PARTY system. And you think you're safe in it because you're a Democrat.
Again, just wait until your welfare money runs out, or make-work government job you have can no longer afford to employ you. At this point, it's a virtual guarantee the USA will go bankrupt, even if the current problems are stopped RIGHT NOW.
But this is also going to soon be the first time in my life where I get to see right-wingers stop being patient and start fighting back for a change.
