so it was necessary to gas innocent moms and kids just because they were jews?
Sadly, yes. - that's what happens in war. I suppose bombing Dresden [which was nothing more than the Allies having a dick-measuring contest with a dead man at that point] was ok to you? Tell me, friend - WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?
The difference is - Jews own the mainstream media and Big Tech, and got you to think that one is wrong, while one you may never have heard of.
As Jews don't have a nation [well - at the time], you could say that for historic Jews in the diaspora, "their race was their nation". Does that make sense? So when the financial interests of England and France clashed, you'd get a war...right? But when the interests of Jewish and White nobility clashed, you'd get a pogrom.
You can't exactly fight a war against a people that exist in no nation. Hence all the "pogroms" Jews have been through. This is hardly any different than my people [the English] having fought however many wars against the French throughout the years, and however many dying...but because Jews have no nation, they get attacked as a people.
But here's the thing - in the end, during war, we ALL get attacked as a people. Jews simply use the historical fact that they exist in a diaspora to claim they have been victims of genocide more, but ALL WARFARE IS GENOCIDAL. When France and England fought many of their wars, were the French not trying to kill as many of my people as possible?
Just to clarify the Jewish claims of being victims of genocide rather than warfare. Yeah, tell my grandmother who lost one of her two brothers who fought in WWII that, I'm sure that will make her feel much better about his TERRIBLE DEATH.
Here's the thing to remember, International Jewry [this was the term used at the time, equivalent today to "Negro" today, so you can call it "Jewish Elites", if you prefer] were giving more than ample warning from Hitler, from start to finish. Examples:
[1] International Jewry boycotts all of Germany, permanently, in 1933. Just look up "Judea Declares War on Germany", from March 24th, 1933. Hitler - a vegetarian, who enacted some of the strongest animal rights laws in existence, because he was a good man, who loved his people - responded. How did he respond?
By boycotting Jewish businesses for one day. FOR
ONE DAY. Meanwhile, 1/3 of Germany's economy was now screwed because Jews used their international networks of White contacts to stop trading with Germans. The Jewish loss alone would have been substantial, but fine - I take no issue with Jews ending their business with Germany over Hitler having realistic views on the consistent Jewish negative influence on White goyim society [because as we all know, if you don't spend your life kissing Jewish ass like me, you are "antisemitic"]. But to go and get other Whites around the world involved with this? I'm sorry, but that's just agitation. And, despite 1/3 of Germany's economy now crippled because of Jewish meddling, Hitler responded with ONE DAY of boycotts against Jewish businesses:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_boycott_of_Jewish_businessesThe Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses (German: Judenboykott) in Germany began on April 1, 1933 [AND ENDED ON THIS DATE - DO YOU SEE HOW THIS PIECE MISLEADS YOU? THEY LEAVE THE DATE OPEN, TO BRAINWASH DUMB WHITES INTO THINKING THIS WAS WHEN JEWISH PERSECUTION STARTED IN GERMANY], and was claimed to be a defensive reaction [no shit - what the hell else would you call it?] to the Anti-Nazi Boycott, which had been initiated in March 1933. It was largely unsuccessful [LMAO!!! I thought evil Germans hated Jews, and Hitler was an evil monster / Jew-hater? Yet this was "largely unsuccessful"? That's not consistent with the anti-German narrative - when you lie, heck, even when you tell the truth, always remember "The Law of Unintended Consequences"], as the German population continued to use Jewish businesses, but revealed the intent of the Nazis to undermine the viability of Jews in Germany.
HAHAHAHA, "Anti-Nazi" Boycott. That term would actually make sense with some of the stigma it carried if the date was April 1, 1943. But this was in 1933. Hitler nor any German as a direct result or political allegiance with his party had not killed ONE JEW, or ordered the death or ANYTHING related to Jews at this point. NOTHING. So what this blurb about "Nazis" really means is "Jews hate any goyim who elect nationalistic leaders, so we're going to make up terms to smear them."
[2] Check out this one [and keep in mind that Jews ALWAYS overplay their hand]:
Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild stayed in Austria far too long, and while attempting to flee, was arrested at the Austrian border:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_RothschildAfter the Anschluß of Austria to Nazi Germany in March 1938, he was arrested at the airport at Aspern and taken into custody by the Nazis because he was a distinguished member of the Jewish oligarchy. He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.
And...do you know how much $21 million represented? Well - $459 million in today's dollars. How rich is this family to shell out almost half a billion dollars for a family member? The Rothschild family controlled one billion in assets by 1850, but as I said, I strongly believe Hitler BADLY wrecked their banks, hence the NONSTOP lies and movies and filth said about this man.
I couldn't help but notice all these Jewish-produced movies about Hitler fail to point out that Germans were starving, and committing suicide in skyrocketing numbers because of debt owed to Jewish banks. Just the AUDACITY of Jews not to mention this makes me sick. When I learned all this - I was SHOCKED. I went in a massive resentment phase I came out of in 2016, but have since gone back in. But to say so many bad things about Germany, and to leave out [for example] THIS:
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.htmlSeriously? SERIOUSLY? OH, SMALL LITTLE DETAIL - MOVE ALONG DUMB GOY. GO BE A GOOD GOY.
Oh - but here's the kicker. As I alluded to above, Germans were starving and dying/committing suicide due to the ridiculous amount of usury imposed on them from the Jewish investment banks.
Do you know how much Hitler asked back from the Rothschild bank? Well - as shown above - $21 million. But do you know what that represents?
IT REPRESENTS HOW MUCH MONEY THE AUSTRIAN BANK OF ROTHSCHILD RIPPED OFF FROM THE AUSTRIAN BRANCH IN THE COLLAPSE OF 1934.
Yet AGAIN, more evidence that Hitler was a good person. He didn't FINANCIALLY EVISCERATE the Rothschild family [shit - he would have been WELL within his rights to have them all executed, but most took off as refugees while he rose to power]. But no - he simply asked for the money back that the Rothschilds STOLE from the Austrian people - that's it!
[3] Last one:
After Hitler captured France, and had 3x the power of the Allies, he STILL CALLED FOR PEACE. He allowed England to drop bombs on Germany for 3-4 months before finally retaliating. At that point, it was probably too late to win the war. But Hitler's naivety, and wishing only for peace was ultimately what cost him the war.
So to answer your question:
In light of the 50,000 Germans who died in Danzig [Poland], despite Hitler's repeated calls for peace, despite asking that only the German women and CHILDREN be sent home [and was denied - FIVE ATTEMPTS AT PEACE FROM HITLER, ALL DENIED], and all his further attempts at peace denied...
It makes me sad to write this. Just knowing that I was lied to by cognitively superior Jews. Lies, lies, lies. Jews never do anything bad - just ask a Palestinian.
I'll put it this way...
No, I won't, actually.
Go watch "The Hitler Speech They Don't Want you to Hear" on Bitchute. It was removed from YouTube after hitting something like a million views, and 50,000 Likes, with a 95% Like to Dislike ratio.
I know I'm the only person willing to SAY these things, but I have been doing some mathematical calculating lately, and as of right now, I am confident that there are more White males with my views on Jews than there are...Jews. Period.
Antisemitism truly is the highest since WWII, and now is not the time to do shit like have Biden give preferential treatment to non-White-owned businesses, etc.
Don't poke the White bear further than you already have.
But hey - just like in WWII: both sides are doubling down. The difference is - it's been the left agitating and destroying property and demanding rights in the name of privileges for years, if not decades now. White right-wing males have just sat back and taken it.
Remember last time, 65+ million people died, and only 15% were "Nazis" [or Italian Fascists, or anyone else from The Axis].
My suggestion is - don't.
But hey, it's just advice.
tl;dr:
In all wars pregnant women get shot and killed. The fact that you think of Jews as being special exceptions to this rule [they're NOT], is evidence of exactly what I'm talking about - which is just how psychologically controlled White goyim are by Jewish media. AT LEAST 65 million people died during WWII. For you to think of Jews as somehow special [when arguably, they were the agitators who caused BOTH world wars], is very typical of Jewish brainwashing of goyim.
That said, I acknowledge that Jews are intellectually superior to Whites.
So anything I say about Jewish power is said through the lens of "I acknowledge that Jews are smarter than Whites."
So for as much of a "White Supremacist" as I may be...I recognize high average Jewish IQ. It's a fact.
