Yeah, but...
People need values and beliefs. It seems to me that when people lack those things, we see exactly what we're seeing now in the West. I think Sweden is something like 85% atheist, and there was some meme I read online where someone was saying that some empty churches are now basically museums of pseudoscience...like, throwbacks to the days when people subscribed to irrational things that Swedes can visit [I have no idea if this is common in Sweden - Kwon or Van Bilderas may know].
But now that Swedes don't have religion, it's like they put all that spiritual energy into Social Justice activism and other insane leftist cultist bullshit.
And they are paying the piper for doing so.
I also think the concept of marriage is a way to reduce the number of men who cheat, and is way to prevent female hypergamy to get out of hand, which prevents harems from forming [and also prevents women from cheating].
Exactly what "values" do atheists preach? I just think "Big Atheism", or perhaps mainstream "Atheism 2.0" of the 1990s and early 2000s failed because all it does is slam Christians.
That's all it really was, and that's how I see it now - just as an attack on Christianity. I couldn't help but notice the person [presumably an atheist] in her user picture has a Jewish name. Ok, fine. But I find it convenient that Jews don't go around bashing Judaism in Israel.
Gee, I wonder if there is a tendency for Jews to disproportionately attack whatever cultural glue keeps Western Civilization together, while ignoring such attacks for their own people.
I mean, it's not like Israel has 22 anti-Palestinian laws on the books or anything [or did around 2004 to 2008, unless this only recently changed].
Oh wait.
So, in a nutshell, while I can't empirically refute the correctness of not knowing if there is a God, or if any religion is correct [it's true - we don't know], I just look at atheism as being an attack on Christianity.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
I'd like to see all the Jews pushing "diversity" and atheism and social justice in the West to just go live in Israel and push this stuff there.
NOT that they would be allowed to - because Jews would NEVER tolerate such attacks on their own people in the manner White Christians do.
Again, to be clear here: I'm not saying atheism is factually incorrect - I'm saying it's just used as a way to attack Christians, and that's why I can't stand most outspoken atheists.
Like Matt Dillahunty [Matt Dillacunty] - he had a show on Google Videos back in the day, which late moved to YouTube [The Atheist Experience, I think], and it was just a nonstop attack on Christianity and Christians. At one point, one of the Jews on the show whose last name was one of the most Jewish names you could possibly think of [like, literally the name of a precious metal, maybe Pearl - or something like Applebaum or Goldblatt, in terms of it being an obviously Jewish last name] was called out for only bashing Christians, and a caller asked him to say "Fuck Islam" on the show, and he was like "Fuck...Islam. There, I said it. Happy now?"
And then there's Richard Dawkins, who won't bash Islam because he's concerned for his physical safety, something which became obvious to me as he entered his seventies.
But here's my point:
If that prick Dawkins was saying anything brave or that had to be sad, HE WOULD BE WILLING TO RISK HIS SAFETY.
He's just propped up in Jewish media to bash Christianity and Christians - nothing more.
Whether he has any awareness of that - I don't know.
He made a Tweet related to Covid-19 saying that people don't have the right to indirectly put someone in harm's way, and should this stay locked down as a measure against COVID, and I lost almost all respect for him at that point.
YES, WE DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO INDIRECTLY PUT PEOPLE AT RISK - EVERY TIME WE DRIVE A CAR, WE ARE DOING GHIS.
Since that tweet, I have just viewed Dawkins as Christian-hating deplorable prick.
I can understand that he does not want to be targeted by Muslims to be physically hurt or killed, BUT THAT'S EXACTLY WHY HE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING ISLAM - EXACTLY WHY.
Ditto for COVID - I can't fault Dawkins for being concerned about his personal risk of dying of COVID, given his age [he was born in 1942, or maybe 1944], but if he just SAID THAT, I could respect that.
Or he is literally just a dumb fuck who doesn't understand logical arguments ASIDE from those which support atheism, and more specifically, those that attack Christianity]. To suggest we don't have the right to indirectly harm others ultimately becomes "We should never leave or homes or interact with any person ever under any circumstances."
So Dawkins is either too dumb to understand that, or he knows, but still wants COVID restrictions for his own self-interested reasons, because he is a older now, and more frail than he used to be, but doesn't want to just say that [making him a disingenuous prick].
Again, I just hate the atheism that only exists to bash Christians [and a bit to attack Muslims as well, but has mostly been used to bash Christians].
And I think that's one of the reasons why the COVID narrative got so far - atheists and other people who are not religious found religion in it.
What else but religion can explain how people are afraid of a virus that we don't know ANYONE who has even died of, that requires a test to even know we have?
That is OBVIOUSLY religion thinking.
This has been quite the crazy past year or so. Like Fortress said, it's like living in The Twilight Zone.
