Author Topic: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine  (Read 3368 times)

Body-Buildah

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4959
  • Creepy Joe Touches Kids
Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« on: May 20, 2021, 03:28:45 AM »

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=50718

The COVID-19 vaccine really isn’t a vaccine in the medical definition of a vaccine. It’s more accurately an experimental gene therapy that could prematurely kill large amounts of the population and disable exponentially more

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39258
  • There was a man called (blank)
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2021, 04:13:15 AM »
Interesting.

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5702
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2021, 05:02:45 AM »
COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease

J. Bart Classen, MD

https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf

'The current RNA based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients.'

The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations.'

'The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases. The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit'

'There are many other potential adverse events that can be induced by the novel RNA based vaccines against COVID-19. The vaccine places a novel molecule, spike protein, in/on the surface of host cells. This spike protein is a potential receptor for another possibly novel infectious agent. If those who argue that the COVID-19 is actually a bioweapon are correct, then a second potentially more dangerous virus may be released that binds spike protein found on the host cells of vaccine recipients.'

'Genetic diversity protects species from mass casualties caused by infectious agents. One individual may be killed by a virus while another may have no ill effects from the same virus. By placing the identical receptor, the spike protein, on cells of everyone in a population, the genetic diversity for at least one potential receptor disappears. Everyone in the population now becomes potentially susceptible to binding with the same infectious agent.'

'Approving a vaccine, utilizing novel RNA technology without extensive testing is extremely dangerous. The vaccine could be a bioweapon and even more dangerous than the original infection.'

Could mRNA vaccines permanently alter DNA? Recent science suggests they might

Research on SARS-CoV-2 RNA by scientists at Harvard and MIT has implications for how mRNA vaccines could permanently alter genomic DNA, according to Doug Corrigan, Ph.D., a biochemist-molecular biologist who says more research is needed.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/could-mrna-vaccines-permanently-alter-dna-recent-science-suggests-they-might

April 9, 2021 Over the past year, it would be all but impossible for Americans not to notice the media’s decision to make vaccines the dominant COVID narrative, rushing to do so even before any coronavirus-attributed deaths occurred.

The media’s slanted coverage has provided a particularly fruitful public relations boost for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines — decades in the making but never approved for human use — helping to usher the experimental technology closer to the regulatory finish line.

Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make.

By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and most mRNA vaccine scientists, the buck then stops there — mRNA vaccines “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way,” the CDC says. The CDC asserts first, that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides), and second, that the cell — Mission-Impossible-style (lmfao) — “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”

A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates.

The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”

Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.

According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”

The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.

In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.

In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”

Reverse transcription

As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus.

Nor is reverse transcription uncommon. Geneticists report that “Over 40% of mammalian genomes comprise the products of reverse transcription.”

The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.

The authors suggest that while the clinical consequences require further study, detrimental effects are a distinct possibility and — depending on the integrated viral fragments’ “insertion sites in the human genome” and an individual’s underlying health status — could include “a more severe immune response … such as a ‘cytokine storm’ or auto-immune reactions.”

In 2012, a study suggested that viral genome integration could “lead to drastic consequences for the host cell, including gene disruption, insertional mutagenesis and cell death.”

Corrigan makes a point of saying that the pathways hypothesized to facilitate retro-integration of viral — or vaccine — RNA into DNA “are not unknown to people who understand molecular biology at a deeper level.”

Even so, the preprint’s discussion of reverse transcription and genome integration elicited a maelstrom of negative comments from readers unwilling to rethink biological dogma, some of whom even advocated for retraction (though preprints are, by definition, unpublished) on the grounds that “conspiracy theorists … will take this paper to ‘proof’ that mRNA vaccines can in fact alter your genetic code.”

More thoughtful readers agreed with Corrigan that the paper raises important questions. For example, one reader stated that confirmatory evidence is lacking “to show that the spike protein only is expressed for a short amount of time (say 1-3 days) after vaccination,” adding, “We think that this is the case, but there is no evidence for that.”

In fact, just how long the vaccines’ synthetic mRNA — and thus the instructions for cells to keep manufacturing spike protein — persist inside the cells is an open question.

Ordinarily, RNA is a “notoriously fragile” and unstable molecule. According to scientists, “this fragility is true of the mRNA of any living thing, whether it belongs to a plant, bacteria, virus or human.”

But the synthetic mRNA in the COVID vaccines is a different story. In fact, the step that ultimately allowed scientists and vaccine manufacturers to resolve their decades-long mRNA vaccine impasse was when they figured out how to chemically modify mRNA to increase its stability and longevity — in other words, produce RNA “that hangs around in the cell much longer than viral RNA, or even RNA that our cell normally produces for normal protein production.”

It is anyone’s guess what the synthetic mRNA is doing while it is “hanging around,” but Corrigan speculates that its enhanced longevity raises the probability of it “being converted over into DNA.”

Moreover, because the vaccine mRNA is also engineered to be more efficient at being translated into protein, “negative effects could be more frequent and more pronounced with the vaccine when compared to the natural virus.”

Dollar signs

Corrigan acknowledges that some people may dismiss his warnings, saying “If the virus is able to accomplish this, then why should I care if the vaccine does the same thing?”

He has a ready and compelling response:

“[T]here’s a big difference between the scenario where people randomly, and unwittingly, have their genetics monkeyed with because they were exposed to the coronavirus, and the scenario where we willfully vaccinate billions of people while telling them this isn’t happening.”

Unfortunately, the prevailing attitude seems to be that the “race to get the public vaccinated” justifies taking these extra risks.

In mid-November, after the Jerusalem Post told readers that “when the world begins inoculating itself with these completely new and revolutionary vaccines, it will know virtually nothing about their long-term effects,” an Israeli hospital director argued that it’s not worth waiting two more years to ferret out mRNA vaccines’ “unique and unknown risks” or potential long-term effects.

In the U.S., enthusiasm for mRNA technology is similarly unfettered. Just a few days after the CDC released updated data showing that more than 2,200 deaths of individuals who had received either the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines had been reported as of Mar. 26 , The Atlantic praised the technology, suggesting that the “ingenious” synthetic mRNA technology behind Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID vaccines represented a “breakthrough” that could “change the world.”

Rather than dismiss the prospect of retro-integration of foreign DNA as a “conspiracy theory,” scientists should be conducting studies with the mRNA-vaccinated to assess actual risks.

In old Disney cartoons, viewers often witnessed Donald Duck’s rich uncle, Scrooge McDuck’s, “bulging eyes [turn] into oversized Vegas slot machine dollar signs” when contemplating opportunities to increase his already immense wealth.

Judging by pharmaceutical company executives’ willingness to overlook mRNA vaccines’ long-term — and possibly multigenerational — risks, they must be similarly entranced by dollar-sign visions of a never-ending pipeline of “plug and play” mRNA products.

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are really ‘gene therapy’ and not vaccines

former professor at the University of Virginia’s school of medicine Dr. David Martin, Ph.D

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mrna-covid-19-vaccines-are-really-gene-therapy-and-not-vaccines-ethicist

“The problem is that in the case of Moderna and Pfizer, this is not a vaccine. This is gene therapy,” he continued. The Moderna and Pfizer creations send “a strand of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen.”

“This is not only not keeping you from getting sick, it’s making your body produce the thing that makes you sick,” Martin added.

The interviewer admitted that this description – that the injection makes one's body produce an effect that makes one sick – sounds somewhat similar to the effect of vaccines.

But Martin countered that it is “not at all” like a vaccine, since “a vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. It’s not supposed to trigger you to make a toxin.”

“It’s not somewhat different. It’s not the same at all,” Martin explained. “It’s a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.”

Targeting the pharmaceutical companies behind the supposed vaccinations, Martin alleged that they have manipulated clinical trial methodology to push their “vaccines” through development and production.

“They (pharmaceutical companies) said they could not test for the existence or absence of the virus and they could not test for the transmissivity because they said it would be impractical. (lol) The companies themselves have admitted to every single thing I’m saying, but they are using the public manipulation of the word vaccine to co-opt the public into believing they’re getting a thing which they are not getting.”

Instead, Martin warns that an mRNA injection “is not going to stop you from getting coronavirus. It’s not going to stop you from getting sick. In fact, on the contrary, it will make you sick far more often than the virus itself.”

Martin presented data confirming his claim, noting that after receiving their second shot of the jab, “80 percent of people had one or more clinical presentations of COVID-19,” whereas “80 percent of people who have an infection according to RT-PCR have no symptoms at all.”

Explaining what the figures mean, he said that people “will get COVID-19 symptoms from getting the gene therapy passed off as a vaccine. You will get COVID symptoms from that 80 percent of the time. If you’re exposed to SARS-CoV-2 according to RT-PCR (positive PCR test), 80 percent of the time you will have no symptoms at all.”

Looking more closely at the claims emanating from the clinical trials, Martin questioned the integrity of companies developing mRNA “gene therapy technology.”

“A human being is going to be potentially exposed to unclassified, both short-term and long-term, risks of altering their RNA and DNA from exposure to this gene therapy,” Martin warned. Of the 40,000 participants in Moderna’s clinical trial, Martin noted that only a “few hundred people had a few days less severe symptoms with the gene therapy when compared to the other control group.”

Even this, he said, is unreliable information, as the pharmaceutical firms “separate out adverse events from actual COVID symptoms.” This allowed the companies to reclassify “a lot of what would have been considered to be COVID symptoms by calling them adverse events,” giving rise to “this ridiculous 90 percent plus effectiveness.”

“As a result of that, we have both a methodology problem, which by the way, has been criticized by a number of clinical scientists. The bigger problem is that they’re still not measuring viral susceptibility and viral transmission. Those are the two legs of the stool that is (sic) required for anyone to say that they are vaccinating a population for public health reasons.”

Martin advised that “this (gene therapy) is not a prophylactic, this is not helping us, we are being told to take a treatment for a disease we don’t have and most likely will not have.”

this 'vaccine' will introduce modified, synthetic mRNA (based on 'modified' rona retrovirus)

which will do what?

reverse transcribe into single strand cDNA, generating into double strand cDNA, incorporating into (via integrase enzyme) host cell genome - rendering your innate DNA desolate.

'Further, provided are polynucleotides, primary constructs or mmRNA which may contain an internal ribosome entry site (RES). First identified as a feature Picorna virus RNA, IRES plays an important role in initiating protein synthesis in absence of the 5′ cap structure. An IRES may act as the sole ribosome binding site, or may serve as one of multiple ribosome binding sites of an mRNA. Polynucleotides, primary constructs or mmRNA containing more than one functional ribosome binding site may encode several peptides or polypeptides that are translated independently by the ribosomes (“multicistronic nucleic acid molecules”). When polynucleotides, primary constructs or mmRNA are provided with an IRES, further optionally provided is a second translatable region. Examples of IRES sequences that can be used according to the invention include without limitation, those from picornaviruses (e.g. FMDV), pest viruses (CFFV), polio viruses (PV), encephalomyocarditis viruses (ECMV), foot-and-mouth disease viruses (FMDV), hepatitis C viruses (HCV), classical swine fever viruses (CSFV), murine leukemia virus (MLV), simian immune deficiency viruses (SIV) or cricket paralysis viruses (CrPV).'

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200354423A1/en?oq=US+2020%2f0354423+A1







kreator

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6615
  • Getbig!
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2021, 06:26:43 AM »
The only people i know that got this crap injected or intend to are the ones I never liked in the first place.

BlackMetallic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10804
  • I am Jack's lack of HRT skills
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2021, 06:41:45 AM »
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=50718

The COVID-19 vaccine really isn’t a vaccine in the medical definition of a vaccine. It’s more accurately an experimental gene therapy that could prematurely kill large amounts of the population and disable exponentially more

True

It is not a vaccine. It neither prevents infection or transmission

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39258
  • There was a man called (blank)
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2021, 07:27:31 AM »
Choose your poison.

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32626
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2021, 09:14:11 AM »
Choose your poison.
I'll let my immune system do it's job.  If it doesn't and I die then I was too weak to live anyway.

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39258
  • There was a man called (blank)
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2021, 05:48:59 PM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Bart_Classen

"John Barthelow Classen is an American immunologist and anti-vaccinationist.[1] He received his M.D. from the University of Maryland, Baltimore in 1988, his M.B.A. from Columbia University in 1992 and obtained his medical license in October 1997.[2][3] He is best known for publishing research concluding that vaccines, in particular the Hib vaccine, cause insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,[4] a hypothesis he proposed based on experiments he conducted on mice in 1996.[5] His views are disputed and considered unverified.

A widely-reposted 2021 Facebook post claiming that the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 could cause prion diseases was based on a paper by Classen. The paper "COVID-19 RNA based vaccines and the risk of prion disease" was published in Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, whose publisher, Scivision Publishers, is included in Beall's list of publishers of predatory journals. Vincent Racaniello, professor of microbiology and immunology at Columbia University, described the claim as "completely wrong".[1][6][7] Tulane University virologist Robert Garry stated that Classen has offered no evidence for the three pillars of his argument: that the sequence overlaps between the Pfizer vaccine are greater than occur with any randomly-selected stretch of RNA, or that the vaccine could cause zinc to be released and that doing so would affect its purported targets as he proposes.[8]"

Fortress

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20748
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2021, 06:07:20 PM »
“Vaccine”

Lolololololololololol!

Even only several minutes of research will clear up any notion this potion is a vaccine.

It’s eternally baffling why any sane, informed and reasonable person would have some “thoroughly researched” (can’t say thoroughly tested, that’s for sure) gene-therapy-experiment drug injected into his body.

Once that needle’s in your body and the plunger depressed, that’s it. The soup ain’t ever coming out.

And for what, a new strain of flu?!

Hahahahahahahahahaha!

The average human is a scared, following sheep who overreacts and allows emotion to cloud any possibility of reason and logic.

“But I want to travel.” “It’s the only way we’re gonna get back to normal.” “I’m doing it to protect others.”

Lololololololololol!

My province’s premier said, ... “(the vaccine) is the key to getting back your freedom ... of getting back to normal.”

How dare this turd suggest our freedom is someone else’s to give back to us.

Freedom is our RIGHT. It is not a privilege.


Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5702
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17098
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2021, 10:39:34 PM »
which did u choose?

Ziil what does the data say about the Johnson and Johnson vaccine? This version is a more typical weakened virus that is injected, correct?

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5702
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2021, 01:21:37 AM »
what does the data say about the Johnson and Johnson vaccine?

dna/mrna 'vaccines' r designed to have delayed effect, to allow for sufficient numbers (before the horror show manifests), and achieve the same end result.

kreator

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6615
  • Getbig!
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2021, 03:25:39 AM »
“Vaccine”

Lolololololololololol!

Even only several minutes of research will clear up any notion this potion is a vaccine.

It’s eternally baffling why any sane, informed and reasonable person would have some “thoroughly researched” (can’t say thoroughly tested, that’s for sure) gene-therapy-experiment drug injected into his body.

Once that needle’s in your body and the plunger depressed, that’s it. The soup ain’t ever coming out.

And for what, a new strain of flu?!

Hahahahahahahahahaha!

The average human is a scared, following sheep who overreacts and allows emotion to cloud any possibility of reason and logic.

“But I want to travel.” “It’s the only way we’re gonna get back to normal.” “I’m doing it to protect others.”

Lololololololololol!

My province’s premier said, ... “(the vaccine) is the key to getting back your freedom ... of getting back to normal.”

How dare this turd suggest our freedom is someone else’s to give back to us.

Freedom is our RIGHT. It is not a privilege.

The degenerates are even bragging about being pinned on social media. This plandemic has flushed a lot of turds to the surface

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39258
  • There was a man called (blank)
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2021, 03:43:31 AM »
which did u choose?


Haven't got the vaccine yet.

For me personally I don't think it's necessary.

If I had risk factors or co-morbitities I would get it.

Quite a few institutions in the U.S. are making the vaccine mandatory for employment or school attendance.

These institutions may be on the hook for liability if people get ill from a vaccine they mandated.  Some big lawsuits will result.

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5702
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2021, 04:02:31 AM »
If I had risk factors or co-morbitities I would get it.

stupidity is a 'risk factor', dumb dumb. 

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5702
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2021, 04:11:27 AM »
looks like a pleasant way to go...

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DkwardX3WMrz/

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39258
  • There was a man called (blank)
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2021, 04:11:39 AM »
stupidity is a 'risk factor', dumb dumb. 

Don't try and sweet talk me now.

POB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3382
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2021, 05:27:46 AM »
One thing you can’t argue is the vaccines are great at killing covid. Look at the numbers down dramatically in all states masks or not month over month after they were introduced. If you don’t want to do the mRNA vaccines cause they haven’t been out long enough I get it but it be rather ignorant not to get the J&J. If your worried about the 6 people who got a blood clot out of 7m take a aspirin every day for a month.

G_Thang

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19757
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies!
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2021, 05:51:28 AM »
One thing you can’t argue is the vaccines are great at killing covid. Look at the numbers down dramatically in all states masks or not month over month after they were introduced. If you don’t want to do the mRNA vaccines cause they haven’t been out long enough I get it but it be rather ignorant not to get the J&J. If your worried about the 6 people who got a blood clot out of 7m take a aspirin every day for a month.

No, I don't want fools like you in my face about a fucboi vaccine when I already have antibodies from exposure during the summer.  Tired of the bullshit.  Natural antibodies work just as wells as synthetically produced antibodies.

Yeah, I will continue to wear a mask until I see a near-nill infection rate.

Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #19 on: May 21, 2021, 06:17:54 AM »
One thing you can’t argue is the vaccines are great at killing covid. Look at the numbers down dramatically in all states masks or not month over month after they were introduced. If you don’t want to do the mRNA vaccines cause they haven’t been out long enough I get it but it be rather ignorant not to get the J&J. If your worried about the 6 people who got a blood clot out of 7m take a aspirin every day for a month.

Same thing happened this time last year in the absence of vaccines. It’s called the end of flu season:


Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #20 on: May 21, 2021, 06:19:37 AM »
One thing you can’t argue is the vaccines are great at killing covid. Look at the numbers down dramatically in all states masks or not month over month after they were introduced. If you don’t want to do the mRNA vaccines cause they haven’t been out long enough I get it but it be rather ignorant not to get the J&J. If your worried about the 6 people who got a blood clot out of 7m take a aspirin every day for a month.


The same thing has happened every year since 1982. It’s called the end of flu season.


G_Thang

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19757
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies!
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #21 on: May 21, 2021, 08:43:43 PM »

The same thing has happened every year since 1982. It’s called the end of flu season.

The graph is consistent.  For those on here in healthcare or research, they know that the graph matches the peak season for Flu.  Keep the goodies coming.

As noted for months, Covid is jimmy-rigged, lab super flu. 

From Fluhan with Love!

Body-Buildah

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4959
  • Creepy Joe Touches Kids
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #22 on: May 23, 2021, 02:00:49 AM »
The graph is consistent.  For those on here in healthcare or research, they know that the graph matches the peak season for Flu.  Keep the goodies coming.

As noted for months, Covid is jimmy-rigged, lab super flu. 

From Fluhan with Love!


Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #23 on: May 23, 2021, 08:09:51 AM »
The graph is consistent.  For those on here in healthcare or research, they know that the graph matches the peak season for Flu.  Keep the goodies coming.

As noted for months, Covid is jimmy-rigged, lab super flu. 

From Fluhan with Love!

It’s a manufactured crisis that’s coming to a manufactured end.

This one takes the cake. You have an outbreak of Covid on the New York fucking Yankees. This time last year it would be the end of the world. Now, not only is it not a big deal. It’s evidence that vaccines are working.😂😂😂



Why the Yankee Covid-19 breakthrough cases shouldn't worry you - CNN

New York Yankees' breakthrough infections demonstrate the Covid-19 vaccine works. Here's why


https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/20/health/yankees-covid-19-breakthrough-infections/index.html

G_Thang

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19757
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies!
Re: Highly Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine
« Reply #24 on: May 23, 2021, 10:29:18 AM »
U.S. CDC looking into heart inflammation in some young vaccine recipients

Basically, teens are asymptomatic, have no symptoms but are given vaccines that are making them sick. Make sense of that.