Author Topic: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.  (Read 2918 times)

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Hey Phantom Spunker - please tell me how I should JUMP FOR JOY seeing bullshit like this happen more and more.  Things that will negatively impact my children, and is detrimental to White people as a group, but MUH DIVERSITY IS MUH GREATEST STRENGTH!!!  WOO!!!  Right?  ::)

That's why you can call me a neo-Nazi or call me a racist all you want: it has ZERO EFFECT ON ME, and the fact that I see it have such a censorious effect on other White people is EXACTLY why I keep talking about this stuff.

And as long as the 5% of people who aren't afraid to talk about this or other similar issues keep doing so, they will have an impact in driving their views forward - unless the day comes when they censor us all, which for sure will result in push-back if that day comes.


Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2021, 01:24:01 PM »
I'm not sure if this is related to the above [I haven't watched the video below yet, just the video above so far], but Kirstie Alley had 80,000 Twitter followers removed just around the time of the 2020 American federal election.  ::)  I can't recall if it was just before or just after, but it was pretty close to the date of the election itself.  After the BS fraudulent results were tabulated, Twitter didn't want anyone talking about the election results, and basically censored or outright banned half of the tweeting population [the right half, naturally].  Even Steve Kuclo was banned for his great crime of simply being a Republican.  And he had a BODYBUILDING TWITTER PAGE, not a political one.  I'm not sure if he even posted any political posts - he was literally banned just for being a non-closeted Republican.  ::)


MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19343
  • Getbig!
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2021, 01:35:36 PM »
Hey Phantom Spunker - please tell me how I should JUMP FOR JOY seeing bullshit like this happen more and more.  Things that will negatively impact my children, and is detrimental to White people as a group, but MUH DIVERSITY IS MUH GREATEST STRENGTH!!!  WOO!!!  Right?  ::)

That's why you can call me a neo-Nazi or call me a racist all you want: it has ZERO EFFECT ON ME, and the fact that I see it have such a censorious effect on other White people is EXACTLY why I keep talking about this stuff.

And as long as the 5% of people who aren't afraid to talk about this or other similar issues keep doing so, they will have an impact in driving their views forward - unless the day comes when they censor us all, which for sure will result in push-back if that day comes.



This is detrimental to ALL people, because it teaches that racism is cool. It's just as STUPID at the Ivy League schools that discriminate against white and Oriental kids who smoke the SATs/ACTs and have super-high GPAs, while letting black and Hispanic kids with inferior marks get in the doors.

Dokey111

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4342
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2021, 02:57:48 PM »
What about jews?

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2021, 02:57:54 PM »
This is detrimental to ALL people, because it teaches that racism is cool. It's just as STUPID at the Ivy League schools that discriminate against white and Oriental kids who smoke the SATs/ACTs and have super-high GPAs, while letting black and Hispanic kids with inferior marks get in the doors.

MCWAY - thank you for bringing up the Asian lawsuit against the Ivy Leagues [most recently - Yale] for blatant discrimination in SAT scores.  I hadn't checked on the status of that lawsuit for a while, so I'm glad you addressed it here.  Asian students were not only discriminated against in admissions standards - but they were discriminated to an even greater degree than were White students!  Can you believe that?!  Wow... :o  If I recall correctly, an Asian with an SAT score of 1600 [perfect score] was "equal" to a White student with a 1500 SAT score, who was in turn "equal" to a Black student with a 1350 SAT score.  I may be misremembering that - it may have been: Asian = 1600, White = 1450, and Black = 1350.

^ I'm pretty sure it was one of those two.  It may have been that Blacks with a 1300 SAT score had the same chance of being admitted to the Ivy Leagues as an Asian with 1600, but that seems absurd.  Heck, even a 1350 seems absurd, but 1300 or less would be that much more ridiculous...so I'm pretty sure that for every Asian with a 1600 SAT score, they had the same probability of being admitted as a Black with an SAT score of 1350...with Whites at either 1500 or 1450, as I mentioned above.

After being reminded of the lawsuit from your post, I went to get an update on it:

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/03/politics/yale-university-affirmative-action-lawsuit/index.html

Quote
(CNN) - The Justice Department on Wednesday dropped an affirmative action lawsuit the Trump administration had filed against Yale University last year accusing the school of discriminating against Asian American and White applicants in its undergraduate admissions process.

The lawsuit was originally filed in October when the department, led by then-Attorney General William Barr, alleged: "Yale rejects scores of Asian American and white applicants each year based on their race."

The decision to drop this lawsuit is the latest move by the Biden administration to change its positions in several cases that are pending in federal courts around the country. The new administration also recently asked the Supreme Court to pause arguments in cases involving the US-Mexico border wall and US asylum policy.

OH FOR F*CK'S SAKE!!

You seriously can't make this up.  ::)

Again, I had NO IDEA why any White person [or, for that matter, Asian person] would vote Republican.  With Asians, at least historically, you would think they would have some racial basis by which to vote Democrat, but that's only on the basis of racial "progressive" policies that Asians tend not to really need anyway, as Asians consistently perform at or above the White level in virtually all areas of society as it is [GDP or income per-capita, access to education including the percentage of graduates, access to healthcare and healthcare outcomes, rates of criminality and incarceration, which tend to be low for Asians - even lower than those of Whites, and numerous other measures].

I think if Asians continue to get screwed over with "progressive" racial quota policies, that they will start voting for Republicans more.  I think they vote for Democrat based on being minorities - although I'm unclear as to why it would matter if one is a minority or not.  I thought "racial diversity is our greatest strength".  Ok, so why the chronic tension, and complaints about non-Whites being "oppressed", and how it's racist for White people to vote for politicians or parties who are in line with our racial interests?  ::)  How come race is ALL THE LEFT EVER F*CKING TALKS ABOUT, if "diversity" is so amazing?  It just seems odd to me that all leftists do is bitch about racism if diversity is the secret ticket to a successful society.

Because White-majority societies are so much better when we mass-import millions of people from the developing world, right?  And Brazil - which is the balkanized future in store for Canada and the USA, if current immigration trends continue - is a complete dump.  One of the most criminalized societies on the PLANET, that had over 50,000 murders last year.

I saw my friend's leftist brother [who is an elementary school teacher] at the gym daycare once, and I said "What do you think is so great about diversity?  Why do you strive for it so much?"  And he said "I want Canada to be like Brazil, where everyone gets along."

LOL!!!!  Wow.  Is this moron serious?!  Brazil is a complete dump!  And if THAT is the example that leftists have to use to show the "greatness" of the "diverse" future of The West, maybe diversity isn't all it's hyped up to be?  ::)  Just a thought.

It just goes to show that leftists live in La La Land, and have no real world examples by which to base their political fantasies.  Flipping losers.

I saw that same leftist loser in the gym daycare once, and I noticed his young daughter was speaking very well given how young she was [maybe 2-3 years old].  I asked him whether or not she was more advanced than average for her age.  In typical idiot liberal fashion, he said "All kids are different, and develop at different rates."

My eyes always roll in the back of my head when speaking to an idiot liberal.  ::)

I was like *sigh* *deep breath*, and asked him: "So if a child isn't speaking a word by the age of five, that's perfectly fine, since all children develop at different rates?"

He responded: "That might mean there's a problem."

NO F*CKING SHIT THAT MIGHT MEAN THERE'S A PROBLEM - HENCEWHY CHILD PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE LINGUISTIC BENCHMARKS FOR CHILDREN TO REACH AT CERTAIN AGES, AND HENCE WHY I ASKED THE LEFTIST MORON IF HIS DAUGHTER WAS MORE ADVANCED FOR HER AGE THAN AVERAGE.

But he couldn't answer - like a typical leftist scumbag, just about ALL OF WHOM have holier than thou attitudes based on how quickly they judge anyone they perceive to be even remotely on the political right, but they constantly say things to come across like they are better or somehow more moral than other people, even if it means making complete asinine statements that denote complete ignorance in terms of understanding the natural trajectory of language development of their own children.

The correct answer from this jackass would have been: "She's speaking very well, and is a little advanced for her age", or "She's speaking very well, but I'm not sure exactly what the targets are by age, so I couldn't tell you if she is above average.  Thank you for saying you think she is though, that's a very nice compliment."

...

Or SOMETHING like that.

But nooo - this twat had to make some vague statement suggesting that how well a child speaks at their respective age makes no difference because "all children are different".  Yeah genius - and if a child hasn't spoken his first word by age five, CHANCES ARE THERE IS A PROBLEM.  ::)

Of course in reality, all these leftist assholes do is spew a bunch of niceties about how they don't judge others, while being the biggest, most judgmental pricks on the planet.  Which I assume is the case with Phantom Spunker's post above [although I haven't read it yet].

In fact, I find it hilarious that liberals consistently say that they are about supporting the people, but are incredibly hostile to anyone with a different point of view than their own.  I remember once saying in another forum that I don't support the death penalty, only because something like 3% of people on Death Row are INNOCENT according to estimates, and I can't support a system which mathematically guarantees that innocent people will be killed by the state.

But I said that innocent deaths aside, I support the death penalty, and won't shed a tear when another Ted Bundy-esque scumbag is walked to his death.

She - the anti-death penalty leftist - immediately lost her shit and called me every name in the book.

So just to be clear:

This amazing, patient, LIBERAL, bastion of tolerance leftist is horrified at the idea of people who have raped and murdered children, serial killers of women, and all sorts of other assorted scum would get the death penalty, yet can barely tolerate a conversation with someone who is ALSO ANTI-DEATH PENALTY, but who would be pro-death penalty under certain circumstances [if guilt was proven BEYOND ANY DOUBT, and not just beyond a reasonable doubt].

But nope - me essentially siding with her, but having a nuanced view of the topic which would make me supportive of the death penalty under certain circumstances was all it took for her to lose her mind on me!

Enough conversations like that were all I needed to realize that leftists do nothing but CLAIM to be tolerant - when it comes to EVER actually putting their alleged tolerance to the test, they are the VERY FIRST to show that they are no different than the conservatives they tend to despise...if not far WORSE than the conservatives they tend to despise.

And why exactly is it "tolerant" to support a bunch of social programs paid for using OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY?  ::)

Far-leftists never cease to annoy me.  And now, they apparently support a president who is ok with blatantly anti-White discrimination [which has been going on for decades, and is to be expected at this point], and blatantly ANTI-ASIAN DISCRIMINATION as well?  ???  Wow...I guess discriminating based on race is A-OK with the far lefties!  Heaven forbid we strive to hire the best person for the job or anything like that.  Nope - we can't have that.  ::)

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2021, 04:18:19 PM »
What about jews?

I've been studying Jewish influence on Western civilization for 14 years now...do you really need to degrade my views on them by asking some one-dimensional question that you would ask some clouded supremacist bigot who just hates for the sake of hating?  ::)

Anyway, to specifically answer your question, scroll down to my LAST PARAGRAPH IN THIS POST - consider reading that and consider watching the three videos that I have included in this post.  That sort of answers your question as to what happens to Jews in a society becoming increasingly more diverse.

The following commentary - while very good, IMO, and worth reading - will probably bore you to death, even if you ARE interested in the subject matter.  That being said, if you have an interest in this topic - by all means, read it...otherwise, skip to the last paragraph of this post, which succinctly answers your question, and includes three relevant videos.  Even though you asked your question in jest, if you aren't aware of just how RIDICULOUS things have gotten on North American college and university campuses, those videos ARE worth watching [or if you are a fan of Joe Rogan - the last video I posted below was from Joe's podcast].

I have probably studied Jews and Jewish history more than any other group of people in existence, and the views I have on Jews are extremely specific, fact-based, nuanced, and are objectively verifiable using primary source material.  In areas where I don't believe certain claims made about Jews [such as the nature of or extent of The Holocaust], it's precisely because I CANNOT find primary source material backing up such claims.  I can find multiple Jewish historians all citing one another, but following the trail to the top, there is no primary source, and all I ended up with was three Jews quoting one another, with absolute no historical record backing up what they have said.

I won't get into that topic here, but simply put - there is zero evidence that The Holocaust happened in the way described in Jewish-produced Hollywood movies.  That does NOT mean that "no bad things happened to Jews during WWII."  I'm not saying that.  As far as I can tell, at least one million Jews died during WWII, and they were definitely targeted by Whites all over Europe [NOT solely Germans], in part because the average White person in Europe was well-aware of transgressions committed by the Jewish elites who controlled the international financial system [investment banks].  So, I am not of the view that there was no negative actions taken against Jews, what I am saying is that "bad things happening to Jews in WWII" [in a war that killed between 65-80 million people, depending on the estimate you read, with over half of them being civilians], is NOT the same as saying "Six million Jews died at the hands of evil German monsters under the direct instructions of Adolf Hitler, who explicitly planned to exterminate every Jew in the world", because that statement is simply NOT TRUE.

For starters, there is ZERO written documentation of such a plot - not to mention the utter RIDICULOUSNESS of suggesting that Hitler, who was commanding his soldiers to fight in the biggest war in human history on ALL FRONTS, somehow managed to find the time to hatch a plot to murder every Jewish man, woman, and child on the planet, and enact it, while Germany was being squeezed to its limit in the war effort.

It just speaks on how Jews look at EVERYTHING under the lens of their own victimization to suggest something as completely absurd as such as plot can be scripted and then enacted.

Also, I'm a math guy, right?  So I just use simple math [and the law of averages] to point out how moronic some of the claims of The Holocaust are.  For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babi_Yar

Quote
The first and best documented of the massacres took place on 29–30 September 1941, killing approximately 33,771 Jews.


Jews are very smart - but where they thrive in verbal IQ, they definitely lack in math, haha.

To wit:

If 33,771 Jews murdered over a 2-day period is the LARGEST example of a massacre of Jews during The Holocaust, that would mean that 16,886 would be the largest total for a single day.  Now THINK ABOUT THIS LOGICALLY FOR A SECOND:

WWII started with Hitler invading Poland on 1 Sept 1939, over the reclamation of the private corridor of Danzig, which was historically Germanic territory, and only wanted to take it back because 50,000 diaspora Germans living in Danzig had been murdered there, despite Hitler calling for peace FIVE SEPARATE TIMES with the Polish government, finally asking that Poland only send back the German WOMEN AND CHILDREN, and STILL having his requests for peace denied.  So OBVIOUSLY he was justified in invading Poland under every rule of war.  Since Hitler died by suicide on 30 April 1945, I will count that as the final date of the war.  Others would call it 8 May 1945, but Germany was in ruins at that point, and any "Holocaust" taking place would have no longer been in operation at that point.  Others would point to 2 Sept 1945 as the true last date of WWII, but that's only if we consider the Japanese, which are not relevant to the length of time that any such "Holocaust" was in operation.

So taking the number of days between 1 Sept 1939 and 30 April 1945, we have 2,068 days.

Wikipedia states that various estimates of the number of Jews who perished in WWII [all cited by a bunch of Jewish academics, with nothing even remotely resembling adequate primary source documentation on the subject  ::)], but I will just go with the standard oft-claimed "six million" figure.

Ok, so 6,000,000 deaths over a period of 2,068 days.  That works out to an average of just over 2,901 Jewish deaths PER DAY, FOR THE ENTIRE FIVE YEARS AND EIGHT MONTHS THAT WWII WAS BEING FOUGHT, WHILE HITLER WAS STILL ALIVE.

So let me see if I understand this correctly:

2,901 Jews dying PER DAY was an AVERAGE quantity of Jews who were murdered...yet 16,886 Jews dying per day for two days represented the LARGEST MASSACRE OF JEWS during The Holocaust?

So now using the actual numbers to the decimal, that means that the "greatest" massacre of Jews throughout the full length of "The Holocaust" was ONLY 5.819869 TIMES MORE DEATHS THAN AN **AVERAGE** DAY.

LOL.

How would that even be anything worth pointing to?  If Jews were murdered at a rate of 2,901 per day EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE ENTIRE WAR, how would the murder of 16,886 Jews being killed each day for two days be anything significant?

After all - if 2,901 Jews were dying EVERY SINGLE DAY, it would not be unusual at all for there to be days when 5,000 Jews died on one day, or even 10,000+.  Surely with a 2,901 DAILY AVERAGE, there would be ample days of 4,000+ murdered Jews - likely even a day with 4,000 or 5,000 such murders every week or two.

So HOW would the deaths of 16,886 Jews be all that statistically significant ASSUMING THE SIX MILLION FIGURE IS ACCURATE?

And the answer to that one is:

It is much more likely that around one million Jews died - still a HUGE number when you consider how small of a population Jews are, and also why I say that NO ONE "won" WWII; both Whites and Jews suffered similar deaths as a percentage of their overall population.  If you also consider the fact that Hitler plundered and destroyed 4 of 5 of the Rothschild central banks [the Rothschild houses of Frankfurt, Vienna, Paris, and Naples, all four of which were in German-occupied territory controlled by Hitler - leaving only the English branch of The House of Rothschild intact], it just seems to me that NO ONE won WWII.

And that's why it really astounds me that Jewish Bolsheviks - whose mass murder occurred during the interwar "peace period" was so out of control that it directly resulted in the rise of nationalist movements all over Europe [Nazism is only the one we continue to hear about, because it was the strongest and most powerful, and most successful at fighting against the murderous Jewish Bolsheviks who were riding high as commissars and administrators in the USSR - but there were MANY more nationalist movements in Europe that propped up at the time, such as Italian Fascism, and nationalistic parties in Nazi-aligned Finland, Hungary, and many others].  More on the Jewish involvement in Bolshevik/communist mass murder is outlined in the article below, written by Jewish scholar Sever Plocker, and posted to the Jewish Ynetnews website:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

^ How odd that every anti-German, anti-White Jewish-produced Hollywood Holocaust propaganda movies seems to forget THAT little detail...gee, 20 million innocent people murdered by Jewish communists - NO BIG DEAL THOUGH, RIGHT?  THAT COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAVE HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE RISE OF HITLER AND NAZISM, RIGHT?

Jews WAY overplayed their hand [not uncommon - what I find strange is how Jews are able to overplay their hands when their survival is not directly on the line], and this resulted in Hitler/Germany overplaying their card as well, after an original period of patience and peace-offerings, which he mistakenly thought would be accepted given that the alternative was all-out war, and something that he made completely clear [what kind of INSANE people would risk all-out war when they KNOW the person making that promise has the capacity to deliver on it?  As Hitler said - these people were insane idiots].  Unfortunately, Hitler allowed England to firebomb Germany for a span of 3-4 months, thinking they would come to their senses.  Had he not done that, as well as a few other mistakes he made [not being amicable to the Ukrainians, based on his disdain for Slavs, and his need for lebensraum {"Living Space"}, and invading Russia - something he did when he became aware of large troop buildups on the Eastern front], Germany quite probably would have won WWII.

It was a VERY close call.

One thing it proved to me is that Jews, for as untouchable as they seem, they most definitely can be removed from the cultural and governmental institutions of The West that they currently dominate, and they can be removed from The West, period.

I wouldn't advocate for that, but if Jewish influence is going to INSIST on bringing in 400,000 new non-White citizens into Canada each year, and to support endless policies of affirmative action and other policies which blatantly discriminate against White people - both of which will negatively impact my children by putting them in greater proximity to violence, as well as causing them all sorts of grief as they are LEGALLY discriminated towards, on the basis of their race - then Canada [and ALL Western nations] will become increasingly more nationalistic, and how nationalistic White countries get will be correlated directly with how anti-White these policies in immigration, hiring and promotion, and other areas ultimately become.  The more White people are targeted by these ridiculous and discriminatory anti-White policies, the more nationalistic they will become.  TRUMP was OBVIOUSLY a sign of just how frustrated White people currently are, as no politician in my LIFETIME would have ever gotten away with some of the race-based comments that he said...

Up until now, any politician not literally SUCKING THE DICK of Black people or other non-Whites was considered "racist".  Politicians like Mitt Romney in the USA, and Stephen Harper in Canada were called racist, despite saying almost NOTHING about race whatsoever - and the comments they DID make were about as innocuous as they come.

And they were STILL called "racist" nonstop!  I think that is exactly what made Whites so fed up about it all - being forced to walk on eggshells, and even if they DID walk on eggshells, they would be called racist!  That's why Trump - who said WAY more "racist" things in his 2016 presidential campaign than any other presidential nominee in American history - was so incredibly popular.

And THAT is exactly what happens when things get bottled up - they EXPLODE into the mainstream as they did with Trump, which has since resulted in the biggest mass censorship of the internet that I have EVER seen in my entire lifetime.

But if things STILL get bottled up, while simultaneously, the issues that White people are concerned with are not only IGNORED, but ultimately amplified by way of greater and greater immigration numbers into the United States and other White-majority societies, the next electoral "blow-up" might not be a Trump - and could very well be a Hitler.

I don't think things are that bad YET...after all, we are still rich and fat for the time being.  And that's why I don't think we'll be seeing a Hitler any time soon.  However, if the legitimate concerns of White people are ignored, we will see more and more nationalistic and "racist" leaders rise to prominence.

I sort of get it from the Jewish perspective though:

Whites have historically outcompeted Jews all throughout history.  Not because we are smarter than Jews [we are not - not if we are strictly using average IQ as a measure], and I think Jews as a group feel the same way I did as a high school nerd; it was so annoying seeing girls go after one dumb high school jock after another, yet a person like me who had way more ultimate moneymaking potential due to my IQ was completely ignored because I wasn't "hot" enough or whatever.  It was frustrating seeing these dumb jocks get more success in the areas that I wanted to succeed in, all because they had more athletic ability than I did.  I think Jews feel similarly - Whites are not lacking for smarts, but arguably, are not as smart as Jews.  Despite this, we still have the most global and territorial, military, and political power than any other race on the planet, Jews included [who have the most of such power on a pound-for-pound basis, just not overall].  And Whites primarily only outcompete Jews because we outnumber them 60 to 1.  I could see how Jews would find that frustrating - imagine if Wayne Gretzky was made to play the other team all by himself.  He would no doubt lose game after game, because even the best player in any game can lose if he is sufficiently outnumbered.

So I get why Jews have a chip on their shoulder regarding historical events.  What I don't understand is why they NEVER take a neutral view at the things they did throughout history that may have led to some of the suffering they endured.  I'm sorry, but the idea that Jews are just somehow victims 100% of the time is complete horseshit.  ::)  Schindler's List portrays this in an even more moronic fashion, by showing all Jews as being wonderful, glorious creatures who can do no wrong - even with one Jewish structural engineer [IIRC] being shot and killed on the spot for simply helping an evil German, by showing him that the blueprints for the concentration camp were wrong, and that they the concentration camp would cave in if the error in design that she spotted wasn't corrected.

Ah yes, of course - Jews are just soooo perfect, that even when they are helping to construct a building to be used to MURDER THEM, they are just so damn perfect, that they will even correct a mistake by the evil White monsters about to murder them, only to result in their immediate murder by the evil Whites, who - WOULDN'T YOU KNOW IT - irrationally hate Jews so much, that they need to even kill Jews who are attempting to help them.  ::)

What a bunch of shit - could that fucking movie been any more ridiculous?  Everything from showing a little German girl saying "Goodbye Jews!" [because of course - even German CHILDREN are evil], and showing some random German using a sniper rifle to randomly shoot Jews in the internment camps [something that would have NEVER happened in real life], was all so completely ridiculous.

Typical Jewish delusional horseshit.

Can anyone reading any of this REALLY fault me for having the views I do about Jews?  I remember once asking an online friend why he had the views he had on Jews [views that I currently hold].  He explained maybe a quarter of what I explained above, and said, "So as you can see...I'm a little sour at the bastards."

LOL.

It's not that I hate Jews, but the sheer amount of social justice horseshit, all originated by Jews and pushed the hardest by Jews in White societies REALLY grinds my balls, and to have to experience this sort of disgusting discrimination while being told that *I* am the perpetrator or oppressor?  REALLY?  ::)  Yeah - fuck that!

Anyway, to answer your question as to what about the Jews, that's an interesting question.  On face value, any Jew who does not openly state that he is Jewish in hiring and promotion or college or university enrollment documents, will be perceived as White.  So for any Jew not explicitly stating that they are Jewish, they will suffer just as Whites do.  In some cases, even if they DO declare themselves to be Jewish, they will still suffer the same as Whites do.  Keep in mind this one tendency of Jews:

Jews are Jewish when it is convenient to them, and Jews are White when it is convenient to them.  For example, in an episode of "All in the Family", Archie Bunker befriended a Black Jew [I think portrayed by Sammy Davis Jr.].  This was to promote the meme that Jewishness is not an racial characteristic [even though it is].  The point is to say that to be Jewish is to subscribe to Judaism, as Jewishness is only Judaism - a religious characteristic.

At other times - when speaking about The Holocaust, and emphasizing their victim status, they make sure to talk about "Germans and Jews", which from the context of strict religious Jewishness, should be "Christians and Jews".  But it's not - when Jews want to portray themselves as unique victims of White people, they need to portray themselves as RACIALLY DISTINCT from White people.

It's a bit tricky playing both sides like that...and Jews may be good at doing that [and doing the same thing elsewhere, such as riling up The West to hate Muslims so that we continue to fight proxy wars on behalf of Israel in the Middle East, while simultaneously embracing the importation of Muslims into our societies - not to mention the increase in anti-Jewish crimes of violence that have happened as a direct result of said immigration policy], but as with everything, there is something called "The Law of Unintended Consequences].

So to answer your question...DUN DUN DUN...check out what happened to evolutionary biology professor, Dr. Bret Weinstein, when he chose to show up to his former place of work, Evergreen College, during "White People Stay at Home Day".  Dr. Weinstein [who has made some AMAZING videos lately about the safety, or lack therefore, of the vaccine] decided that he felt it was wrong that anyone should be excluded from campus on the basis of their race [OH MY GOD - HOW COULD ANYONE BELIEVE SUCH A THING?!  :o :o :o], and decided to go to work.  Even though Dr. Weinstein was Jewish, he was perceived as Whites [as Jews generally are perceived as White, given the amount of European genetic admixture they have in their DNA], and this is what happened to Dr. Weinstein [all of these videos are worth checking out - just to see how INSANE things have gotten in the past 6-8 years, I would say]:






wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71587
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2021, 04:20:39 PM »
Matt,hurry up and get over to Stormfront.....they need you badly.

You fucking fruitcake.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19343
  • Getbig!
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2021, 10:54:19 PM »
MCWAY - thank you for bringing up the Asian lawsuit against the Ivy Leagues [most recently - Yale] for blatant discrimination in SAT scores.  I hadn't checked on the status of that lawsuit for a while, so I'm glad you addressed it here.  Asian students were not only discriminated against in admissions standards - but they were discriminated to an even greater degree than were White students!  Can you believe that?!  Wow... :o  If I recall correctly, an Asian with an SAT score of 1600 [perfect score] was "equal" to a White student with a 1500 SAT score, who was in turn "equal" to a Black student with a 1350 SAT score.  I may be misremembering that - it may have been: Asian = 1600, White = 1450, and Black = 1350.

^ I'm pretty sure it was one of those two.  It may have been that Blacks with a 1300 SAT score had the same chance of being admitted to the Ivy Leagues as an Asian with 1600, but that seems absurd.  Heck, even a 1350 seems absurd, but 1300 or less would be that much more ridiculous...so I'm pretty sure that for every Asian with a 1600 SAT score, they had the same probability of being admitted as a Black with an SAT score of 1350...with Whites at either 1500 or 1450, as I mentioned above.

After being reminded of the lawsuit from your post, I went to get an update on it:

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/03/politics/yale-university-affirmative-action-lawsuit/index.html

OH FOR F*CK'S SAKE!!

You seriously can't make this up.  ::)

Again, I had NO IDEA why any White person [or, for that matter, Asian person] would vote Republican.  With Asians, at least historically, you would think they would have some racial basis by which to vote Democrat, but that's only on the basis of racial "progressive" policies that Asians tend not to really need anyway, as Asians consistently perform at or above the White level in virtually all areas of society as it is [GDP or income per-capita, access to education including the percentage of graduates, access to healthcare and healthcare outcomes, rates of criminality and incarceration, which tend to be low for Asians - even lower than those of Whites, and numerous other measures].

I think if Asians continue to get screwed over with "progressive" racial quota policies, that they will start voting for Republicans more.  I think they vote for Democrat based on being minorities - although I'm unclear as to why it would matter if one is a minority or not.  I thought "racial diversity is our greatest strength".  Ok, so why the chronic tension, and complaints about non-Whites being "oppressed", and how it's racist for White people to vote for politicians or parties who are in line with our racial interests?  ::)  How come race is ALL THE LEFT EVER F*CKING TALKS ABOUT, if "diversity" is so amazing?  It just seems odd to me that all leftists do is bitch about racism if diversity is the secret ticket to a successful society.

Because White-majority societies are so much better when we mass-import millions of people from the developing world, right?  And Brazil - which is the balkanized future in store for Canada and the USA, if current immigration trends continue - is a complete dump.  One of the most criminalized societies on the PLANET, that had over 50,000 murders last year.

I saw my friend's leftist brother [who is an elementary school teacher] at the gym daycare once, and I said "What do you think is so great about diversity?  Why do you strive for it so much?"  And he said "I want Canada to be like Brazil, where everyone gets along."

LOL!!!!  Wow.  Is this moron serious?!  Brazil is a complete dump!  And if THAT is the example that leftists have to use to show the "greatness" of the "diverse" future of The West, maybe diversity isn't all it's hyped up to be?  ::)  Just a thought.

It just goes to show that leftists live in La La Land, and have no real world examples by which to base their political fantasies.  Flipping losers.

I saw that same leftist loser in the gym daycare once, and I noticed his young daughter was speaking very well given how young she was [maybe 2-3 years old].  I asked him whether or not she was more advanced than average for her age.  In typical idiot liberal fashion, he said "All kids are different, and develop at different rates."

My eyes always roll in the back of my head when speaking to an idiot liberal.  ::)

I was like *sigh* *deep breath*, and asked him: "So if a child isn't speaking a word by the age of five, that's perfectly fine, since all children develop at different rates?"

He responded: "That might mean there's a problem."

NO F*CKING SHIT THAT MIGHT MEAN THERE'S A PROBLEM - HENCEWHY CHILD PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE LINGUISTIC BENCHMARKS FOR CHILDREN TO REACH AT CERTAIN AGES, AND HENCE WHY I ASKED THE LEFTIST MORON IF HIS DAUGHTER WAS MORE ADVANCED FOR HER AGE THAN AVERAGE.

But he couldn't answer - like a typical leftist scumbag, just about ALL OF WHOM have holier than thou attitudes based on how quickly they judge anyone they perceive to be even remotely on the political right, but they constantly say things to come across like they are better or somehow more moral than other people, even if it means making complete asinine statements that denote complete ignorance in terms of understanding the natural trajectory of language development of their own children.

The correct answer from this jackass would have been: "She's speaking very well, and is a little advanced for her age", or "She's speaking very well, but I'm not sure exactly what the targets are by age, so I couldn't tell you if she is above average.  Thank you for saying you think she is though, that's a very nice compliment."

...

Or SOMETHING like that.

But nooo - this twat had to make some vague statement suggesting that how well a child speaks at their respective age makes no difference because "all children are different".  Yeah genius - and if a child hasn't spoken his first word by age five, CHANCES ARE THERE IS A PROBLEM.  ::)

Of course in reality, all these leftist assholes do is spew a bunch of niceties about how they don't judge others, while being the biggest, most judgmental pricks on the planet.  Which I assume is the case with Phantom Spunker's post above [although I haven't read it yet].

In fact, I find it hilarious that liberals consistently say that they are about supporting the people, but are incredibly hostile to anyone with a different point of view than their own.  I remember once saying in another forum that I don't support the death penalty, only because something like 3% of people on Death Row are INNOCENT according to estimates, and I can't support a system which mathematically guarantees that innocent people will be killed by the state.

But I said that innocent deaths aside, I support the death penalty, and won't shed a tear when another Ted Bundy-esque scumbag is walked to his death.

She - the anti-death penalty leftist - immediately lost her shit and called me every name in the book.

So just to be clear:

This amazing, patient, LIBERAL, bastion of tolerance leftist is horrified at the idea of people who have raped and murdered children, serial killers of women, and all sorts of other assorted scum would get the death penalty, yet can barely tolerate a conversation with someone who is ALSO ANTI-DEATH PENALTY, but who would be pro-death penalty under certain circumstances [if guilt was proven BEYOND ANY DOUBT, and not just beyond a reasonable doubt].

But nope - me essentially siding with her, but having a nuanced view of the topic which would make me supportive of the death penalty under certain circumstances was all it took for her to lose her mind on me!

Enough conversations like that were all I needed to realize that leftists do nothing but CLAIM to be tolerant - when it comes to EVER actually putting their alleged tolerance to the test, they are the VERY FIRST to show that they are no different than the conservatives they tend to despise...if not far WORSE than the conservatives they tend to despise.

And why exactly is it "tolerant" to support a bunch of social programs paid for using OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY?  ::)

Far-leftists never cease to annoy me.  And now, they apparently support a president who is ok with blatantly anti-White discrimination [which has been going on for decades, and is to be expected at this point], and blatantly ANTI-ASIAN DISCRIMINATION as well?  ???  Wow...I guess discriminating based on race is A-OK with the far lefties!  Heaven forbid we strive to hire the best person for the job or anything like that.  Nope - we can't have that.  ::)

That's basically saying that black and Hispanic kids can't be expected to be as smart as white or Oriental kids. In other words, it's the WORST FORM of racism there is: The bigotry of low expectations.

Treating certain non-white people like retarded children doesn't help one bit. Furthermore, for all the bellyaching that black liberals do about being surrounded by white people, needing their own space (i.e. segregated dorms), and wanting an atmosphere where there are more people like them....

WHY AREN'T THESE WHINY FOLK going to HBCUs (Historically Black Colleges and Universities)? Last time I checked, less than 10% of black college students attended them. And they certainly can use the bodies. If black kids are getting 1350s on their SATs, they should be able to get into a decent HBCU with ease, even they so-called "Black Ivy League" institutions (Morehouse, Spelman, or Howard, the alma mater of the woman who sits as VP).


Moontrane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6310
  • Drill, Baby, Drill!
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2021, 12:34:30 AM »
Rachel has a future after serving in the government.


Body-Buildah

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4959
  • Creepy Joe Touches Kids
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2021, 03:26:46 AM »
Rachel has a future after serving in the government.



The face of the woke, libturd, retard movement.  ::)

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2021, 07:53:19 PM »
Matt,hurry up and get over to Stormfront.....they need you badly.

You fucking fruitcake.

I'm sure they do, but what is your position exactly?

What point did I make that you disagree with?  Do you care to share it with the board?

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2021, 08:07:45 PM »
That's basically saying that black and Hispanic kids can't be expected to be as smart as white or Oriental kids. In other words, it's the WORST FORM of racism there is: The bigotry of low expectations.

Treating certain non-white people like retarded children doesn't help one bit. Furthermore, for all the bellyaching that black liberals do about being surrounded by white people, needing their own space (i.e. segregated dorms), and wanting an atmosphere where there are more people like them....

WHY AREN'T THESE WHINY FOLK going to HBCUs (Historically Black Colleges and Universities)? Last time I checked, less than 10% of black college students attended them. And they certainly can use the bodies. If black kids are getting 1350s on their SATs, they should be able to get into a decent HBCU with ease, even they so-called "Black Ivy League" institutions (Morehouse, Spelman, or Howard, the alma mater of the woman who sits as VP).

I shy away from the word "racist" because it is so vague, and can be hurled at anyone without requiring specific details to be provided, but let me make the same point that you just made - that I agree with - without using the emotionally-charged word "racism":

By allowing Blacks and Hispanics to get into Ivy League schools with lower SAT scores than Asians and Whites, you are [as you said] implying, in a roundabout way, that Blacks and Hispanics are incapable of performing at the same level as Asians and Whites.

I think numerous unintended consequences ultimately arise from such a policy:

[1] Some Blacks and Hispanics are going to think that their government, or fellow citizenry, perceive of them as being inferior, or lacking in intelligence or merit.  I would think that would have a negative impact on Blacks and Hispanics who internalize thoughts along these lines.

[2] Other Blacks and Hispanics will enjoy the affirmative action benefits, and feel entitled to receive more and more of them.  This is somewhat of a politically induced entitlement complex - the product of years of continually being the beneficiaries of such pro-Black, pro-Hispanic, anti-Asian, and anti-White affirmative action programs.

[3] Thomas Sowell said something to the effect that while the Blacks who make it to the Ivy Leagues are in the top 10% of their high schools in mathematics grades [or possibly even the top 1%, I can't recall], they are in the bottom 10% of all Ivy League students, as a result of the affirmative outline programs that they benefit from, as outlined in the OP.  This ultimately fails to align Black students with post-secondary education opportunities on par with their skill level, and puts them at a higher risk of dropping out - potentially wasting tens of thousands of dollars in the process [or going into debt to that extent], and forcing them to either start over at another post-secondary educational institution that is more in line with their academic skills, or enter the workforce without completing a university education, but potentially leaving them with the burden of the student loan debts alluded to above.

That is in addition to the inherent lack of fairness these discriminatory enrollment policies have on Asian and White students, who are more deserving of the positions given to the Black and Hispanic students who received affirmative action benefits, despite having lower SAT scores.

So it's all just a disaster.  And I can't say that I'm surprised that Joe Biden cancelled the anti-Asian discrimination lawsuit against Yale...but I can say I'm disappointed regardless.

Anyone who has a sense of fairness should oppose this sort of blatant, institutional discrimination.

But I guess it's ok, since Asians - like Whites - are succeeding in the USA.  We should continue to pour resources into people, groups, and programs that have failed over and over again, for decades if not centuries, all throughout the history of the United States.  ::)

PS - Great post, MCWAY.  And remember!  It's universities teaching garbage like: "From Good to You By Way of the Zoo!"

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71587
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2021, 08:17:54 PM »
I'm sure they do, but what is your position exactly?

What point did I make that you disagree with?  Do you care to share it with the board?
You`ve made zero points that I could give two  fucks about......who could read half your drivel anyway?

You sir are touched in the head and need psychoanalysis.

Seek help please.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71587
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2021, 08:19:50 PM »
All you talk about is Jews,Blacks,fishy slit,women who fucked you over, your mensa IQ, and penis,cock, pecker,and dick.................... .GEEZUS !!

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33809
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2021, 08:38:19 PM »
Instead of jumping for joy, maybe you should just spend some time with your kids instead you dead beat.

AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19650
  • #TeamFunk51 4 Life
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2021, 09:55:25 PM »
Instead of jumping for joy, maybe you should just spend some time with your kids instead you dead beat.

Oh fuck! 

TheAnimal

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2015
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2021, 10:18:01 PM »
Does Matt use adderall? These are long posts... interesting but I don't think anyone has asked for any of the information he is providing.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71587
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2021, 11:10:47 PM »
Does Matt use adderall? These are long posts... interesting but I don't think anyone has asked for any of the information he is providing.
He likes to read his own opinionated drivel and he shys away from the word racist though he is a huge racist himself.......how convienient.

Won`t even admit to being one and his passive aggressive posts can go suck a cock.

He insults Vince Goodrum,Ron Avidan and OMR then speaks to them in the same breath a though he said nothing offensive towards them.

At least come out and call them niggggeers and kikes......fucking clown.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33809
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #18 on: May 22, 2021, 07:17:54 AM »
He likes to read his own opinionated drivel and he shys away from the word racist though he is a huge racist himself.......how convienient.

Won`t even admit to being one and his passive aggressive posts can go suck a cock.

He insults Vince Goodrum,Ron Avidan and OMR then speaks to them in the same breath a though he said nothing offensive towards them.

At least come out and call them blacks and kikes......fucking clown.


He isn't as much a racist as he is an insecure self loathing child attempting to use racism as a way of establishing his own self identity.  He realizes he is a never-was and a never-will be and uses racism as a way of objectifying other people to be "less" than he is in a shallow effort to feel better about himself. 

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71587
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: White Males PROHIBITED From Jim Henson Puppeteering School.
« Reply #19 on: May 22, 2021, 09:44:28 AM »

He isn't as much a racist as he is an insecure self loathing child attempting to use racism as a way of establishing his own self identity.  He realizes he is a never-was and a never-will be and uses racism as a way of objectifying other people to be "less" than he is in a shallow effort to feel better about himself. 
Indeed sir.