Kid's okay. He looks shorter than 5'6", though, and I am fucking tired of these "classic physique!" types going on about how bodybuilders from the 60s, 70s and 80s had "distinctive looks," as in their physiques were much more recognizable from their silhouettes (or whatever). There's some truth to that, but it is a tired defense of yesterday's bodybuilders. What they should say is, hey, would you rather look like Arnold or do you aspire for the Big Hamy sort?