survival rate is over 99%
average age of death is in the 80's, which are people that already outlived normal life expectancy
why do i need this vaccine and why do the vaccinated get so upset for us not taking it 
E
The only thing I can think of is that these morons think people of all ages are dropping like flies [media lie], and that the vaccine isn't very effective. Well...if the experimental mRNA gene therapy "vaccine" isn't very effective, why would it matter even if we all take it? They could still get it. They probably think it's 70% effective or something, which will really only pack a punch of all of us get it.
But in that case, my suggestion to these people is to just stay home, lock themselves in their basements, and if they do have to go out for any reason, to wear a mask. If they are the irrationally scared ones, why should their right to go out as often as they want without wearing a mask trump my right to not rush to get an experimental vaccine for a virus that has a 0.06% rate of mortality for my age demographic, when I am always highly symptomatic when I get sick, tend to buy enough food and other items to last me a week to a month, preventing me from needing to expose myself to large numbers of people at stores anyway, and have the means to completely self-isolate when sick? It's just so strange being judged by people who think that because they followed the government rules spewed by the news while I do things my own way [but still safely/responsibly, in the midst of an overhyped low-lethality pandemic], that they are somehow being more responsible than I am.
How is a person who goes to Wal-Mart wearing a flimsy paper mask, exposing themselves to dozens of people in a day, or even a hundred or more people over the course of a week somehow less of a public health threat than someone like me who lives alone, lives off my savings and rent checks, and only exposes myself to about 10 people a week [maybe 1-2 per day - two so far today, and I'm probably going to stay in for the rest of the day/night], but doesn't wear a mask?
Especially given that probably half of the people I see regularly are already vaccinated, and would tell me if they were exposed to anyone who had tested positive for the virus.
Even then, those "positive" cases are greatly exaggerated because the PCR tests are WAY too sensitive, and can test for people who actually have the virus using 1,000 times less sensitivity, calling into question if these people even have the virus, and not just a molecule or two of the virus in their system, making them not even positive at all - which explains why so many virus "cases" are among people who have had no symptoms AT ALL, which actually means they never had the virus, but that the overly sensitive PCR test simply detected they had a few molecules of the virus in their system, or even just one molecule, depending on the number of cycle thresholds were used in the administration of the test.
Dr. Kari Mullis [Ph.D in Chemistry] who won the NOBEL PRIZE in Chemistry in 1993 for creating the PCR test in 1983 even said himself that the PCR test is NOT intended to test for viruses, but simply amplifies genetic material upwards of a billion or more times the size, making it readable. THAT is why he won the Nobel Prize in CHEMISTRY, and not in MEDICINE - the test is a chemical test, and is only intended to amplify the very small.
If I had to guess, the PCR test is used to test tiny droplets of blood to determine the genetic code of that blood, to find out whose blood it is, whereas in the past, you would have needed much more blood to do proper blood tests. For example, in the case of the murder of Diana Robertson in 1986, they were able to determine the blood found was human, but they couldn't identify the blood type. The investigator who looks like an ostrich in the video below said that in the Robert Stack version of this episode, but it was cut from the Dennis Farina version for some reason [below], which is also the only version of the episode available on YouTube for some reason.

I think the Stack episodes are better.
But anyway, my point is that the PCR test allows small quantities of genetic material to be amplified, so that police investigators don't need masses of blood or other genetic material to determine the genetic composition of the blood [blood type, and genetic markers which show the race of the person whose blood it is, or even determine the full genetic code of the blood - that's why the PCR test was revolutionary, because it allowed small quantities of blood to undergo far more tests, as some blood is destroyed during testing, and THAT is the point of the PCR test - not testing for individual molecules of viruses in people, and then saying they are positive for that virus.

].
As for this case [below], Michael Reimer's skull was found in 2011, proving all the feminist BS in this episode was wrong, and that he was never the murderer, but was murdered too by an unknown serial killer - it was nice of that serial killer to drive their 3-year-old daughter to K-Mart, and not murder her too. I guess even serial killers have standards of some kind:
^ They removed the part where the ostrich-looking detective said they could not determine if the blood was human, as there was not enough blood present to do the required tests to discover that. They even removed the interview with Reimer's father who made a very obvious case for why Reimer was NOT the serial killer, but that part was taken out, and the feminist angle was emphasized, but proven to be completely wrong when Reimer's skull was found in 2011:
https://www.theolympian.com/news/local/crime/article25296325.htmlHere is the video from the PCR test creator himself, Kari Mullis [Nobel Prize winner, who incidentally, died in August of 2019, right before the pandemic, and therefore, can't speak about the uselessness of the PCR test for testing for viruses.

But he says in in the video below]:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zbU7X38zfwsY^ Odd that that video has been banned from YouTube...as well as videos from Dr. Erickson and Dr. Roger Hodkinson, all of whom speak intelligently about the virus, and how the mandates and lockdowns have been completely ridiculous, and actually much more detrimental to doing nothing at all.
