The Mexican and Indian experiences are certainly compelling. I would have liked to hear a pharacokinetic explanation of what Ivermectin does, particularly since they claimed it helps against the virus as well as vaccine injury. Even if I struggled to follow it, it would have been out there for debate. Maybe they wanted to keep it bro-accessible.
I'm convinced that there is a push to silence or discredit people advocating for treatments and prophylactics other than vaccination. Whether that is a continuation of previous, possibly justifiable policies to censor bullshit or a consciously sinister initiative of some global cabal is hard to say. That reputable, credentialed people are being shut down for discussing out-of-bounds topics is established.
Potentially valid inquiries, which Ivermectin sure seems to warrant, are getting dismissed alongside absurdist Q horseshit and filed with the same. That's a problem. It also causes people like me, who witness this, to question the validity of a sanctioned approach which appears to be shielded from criticism and disingenuously presented as the sole and necessary solution.
Transparency and open discussion fosters trust. If you want people to mistrust you, censor opposing voices and quash discussion.
Weinstein's Dark Horse podcast is mirrored plenty and available. Just not on YouTube. #84 is entitled Hey YouTube: Divide By Zero.
