Author Topic: Rittenhouse Floyd  (Read 1027 times)

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 52041
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
Rittenhouse Floyd
« on: November 19, 2021, 09:05:37 PM »
https://news.yahoo.com/kenosha-hopes-calm-kyle-rittenhouse-014803668.html

Rittenhouse trial could be the 'pendulum swinging' back after George Floyd, expert says






Q

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32432
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2021, 03:03:06 AM »
There never should have even been a trial.

BlackMetallic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10745
  • I am Jack's lack of HRT skills
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2021, 04:04:25 AM »
There never should have even been a trial.

This ^^^^

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 38997
  • "Make up your mind, Rico." - Lt. Jean Rasczak
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2021, 05:21:10 AM »
Riots just beginning.

SweetDaddySiki

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 877
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2021, 06:11:39 AM »
There never should have even been a trial.

Logical if true

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18135
  • Getbig!
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2021, 06:25:52 AM »
Floyd was a career criminal and certified scumbag. No one seems to mention his home invasion and pointing of his gun at a pregnant woman's belly when looking at his statues. He was on a ton of drugs his final arrest. Enough to be fatal. Fuck him.

Rittenhouse used self defense. Liberals want to know they can riot in safety now that they got the cops to stand down and be observers  instead of cracking heads.  Now they have guys willing to defend them self and that's a threat they want eliminated as they arson, assault, loot, vandalize, murder and stop traffic. 

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2021, 11:21:47 AM »
There never should have even been a trial.

Obvious self defense which was confirmed in the trial.  Nothing but a bullshit political prosecution and an attempt to criminalize self defense.

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31841
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2021, 04:27:22 AM »
Obvious self defense which was confirmed in the trial.  Nothing but a bullshit political prosecution and an attempt to criminalize self defense.


Wrong.  Self defense wasn’t confirmed.  What happened was the prosecution couldn’t prove the claim he was an active shooter. The onus is on the prosecution and not the defense to prove the claim. 

f450

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1221
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2021, 09:23:07 AM »
Wrong.  Self defense wasn’t confirmed.  What happened was the prosecution couldn’t prove the claim he was an active shooter. The onus is on the prosecution and not the defense to prove the claim.

Wrong. Self defense wasn't not confirmed either. Prosecution couldn't prove that he was not defending himself or that he provoked the attack.

He sent a  pedophile who was convicted of raping pre-teen boys to hell. The country owes him a debt for that. I am generally anti capital punishment but I make an exception for the pedo. Feeding them to alligators would be too kind.

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2021, 09:46:36 AM »
Wrong.  Self defense wasn’t confirmed.  What happened was the prosecution couldn’t prove the claim he was an active shooter. The onus is on the prosecution and not the defense to prove the claim.
Self defense was proven. The defense carried that burden and jury agreed. Prosecutor saw the case as not a self defense case. But the videos should have probably told the prosecutor that self defense would prevail given a trial.
Rittenhouse has words with them, victim fired a shot in the air, chase ensued. Rittenhouse fired his gun.

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31841
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2021, 10:54:24 AM »
Self defense was proven. The defense carried that burden and jury agreed. Prosecutor saw the case as not a self defense case. But the videos should have probably told the prosecutor that self defense would prevail given a trial.
Rittenhouse has words with them, victim fired a shot in the air, chase ensued. Rittenhouse fired his gun.

Nope.  the jury felt the prosecution couldn't prove without a reasonable doubt that he was there as an active shooter with intent to kill.  That was what they had to decide on.

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2021, 10:59:37 AM »
Innocent until proven guilty has always been my understanding.

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42543
  • Getbig!
Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
« Reply #12 on: November 22, 2021, 11:11:12 AM »
   
F