Could I be very out of order and try and steer this back on topic? Sorta?
Let's ignore what we 'know' or don't (because let's face it none of us really do, beyond the fact that clearly he's on stuff, and more power to him).
But could I ask the question:
Just for sake of argument, if one was getting regular blood work done, had no family history of blood pressure or cardio vascular issues - let's say your grandparents all lived into their late 90s and were actually mobile, active to the extent most regular people are in their late 50s. Let's say you are also not super hung up on living to 100. You'd be happy to make it to say, 65 or thereabouts but you wanted to do it with the body and strength/fitness of someone much younger.
Let's also say that you live somewhere where the various chemicals in question were legal and well within your financial means without anybody in your family missing out on a damn thing whatsoever. Let's also say you are willing to do regular and properly suited (in duration and internsity) cardio as well. ANd lastly that you had a very decent work ethic and discipline when it comes to eating clean always.
With all those in place - realistically speaking what would be people's thoughts on how much and what type of stuff one could/should use to maximise their physique?
To get the ball rolling, iirc big Richard from the delray misfits (love them or hate them) in an early episode alluded to using (I think) around 1400mg total per week, and again iirc most of that was test but I forget what else. That guy was lean and in his 60s and whilst he wasn't scaring an elite ifbb pro size wise, he certainly didn't look too shabby at all for his age. I obviously have no way to tell if he was being truthful, but it didn't seem outrageous. Thoughts?
