Covid-19 - Was Covid ever real? Conspiracy Theory?

[Rambone]

Rambone's blood is the true vaccine.

 

[Primemuscle]

there's not a single person on this board that actually reads these novels you post, you, delusional,pathetic , retard...

You're the online equivalent  to a homeless person muttering  to them selves....

FYI, 'themselves' is one word.

[illuminati]

FYI, 'themselves' is one word.

Not if he splits them up

[ROBOAK]

FYI, 'themselves' is one word.

Why do you post on a board where you are universally  despised?

[Matt]

759 of 4,894,135 Canadians aged 40-49 have died of Covid.

That's just under 0.016%.

What kind of moron gets a vaccine for something 99.99% survivable?

[illuminati]

759 of 4,894,135 Canadians aged 40-49 have died of Covid.

That's just under 0.016%.

What kind of moron gets a vaccine for something 99.99% survivable?

J.oak , LurkinForBoys,  PrimePedo etc etc

[Gym Rat]

"Lets repackage the common cold and flu-bugs, get the sheep to panic over it, and do exactly what we tell 'em"

 

Libturdz / VaxTArdz = Most braindead in History!            Libturdz / VaxTArdz = Most braindead in History!          Libturdz / VaxTArdz = Most braindead in History!         

[falco]

&t=569s&ab_channel=Redacted

Brazil 2025.

[kreator]

&t=569s&ab_channel=Redacted

Brazil 2025.

How dare you, you know it can't be true if they don't report it on MSM!!!

[hardgainerj]

https://twitter.com/draseemmalhotra/status/1613837487796850688?s=46&t=cf8JDgTEj5MKqpk1xmPL9w

[Primemuscle]

https://twitter.com/draseemmalhotra/status/1613837487796850688?s=46&t=cf8JDgTEj5MKqpk1xmPL9w

The BBC came under fire in mid-January 2023 for airing an interview with a controversial COVID-19 vaccine skeptic. On Jan. 13, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on the U.K. channel ostensibly to discuss cholesterol medication, but then turned the conversation to his skepticism about the COVID-19 vaccine.

[Gym Rat]

The BBC came under fire in mid-January 2023 for airing an interview with a controversial COVID-19 vaccine skeptic. On Jan. 13, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on the U.K. channel ostensibly to discuss cholesterol medication, but then turned the conversation to his skepticism about the COVID-19 vaccine.

So what?? Its (jab) force fed down everyones throat 24x7 by libturd media??  Skeptic??  You mean he questioned the poison jab??

How dare he 

People got fired for this fake and deadly jab... People need to hang for it...

[joswift]

The BBC came under fire in mid-January 2023 for airing an interview with a controversial COVID-19 vaccine skeptic. On Jan. 13, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on the U.K. channel ostensibly to discuss cholesterol medication, but then turned the conversation to his skepticism about the COVID-19 vaccine.

you could tell the newsreader had people shouting down her ear to change the subject,,,,

[Rambone]

I had Covid twice. I should be dead by now. Per my dying wish, lay me to rest on top of the pile outside the Italian church my fellow phaggits

[Primemuscle]

So what?? Its (jab) force fed down everyones throat 24x7 by libturd media??  Skeptic??  You mean he questioned the poison jab??

How dare he 

People got fired for this fake and deadly jab... People need to hang for it...

Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on the show under false pretenses. He was scheduled to speak about statins. Instead, he aired his views claiming certain Covid vaccines could be behind excess deaths from coronary artery disease. He was being disingenuous at the least. -Don't know about you, but I have issues trusting people who are dishonest. 

The FDA requires the warning label include that there is a slight risk of heart related issues including blood clots for some people. All medications including aspirin have a (sometimes very long), list of possible side effects. It is up to the individual to determine if the medication is worth the risk.

Although I disagree with employers requiring people to get the vaccine (jab) to remain on the job, hanging them is overkill. The ACLU should defend these folk's right to refuse the jab because it is a violation of their rights.

I oppose any law designed to protect people from themselves, including the seatbelt law as applied to adults. A lot of folks disagree with me for a variety of reasons all of which can be disputed.

Personally, I appreciate getting information about viruses and illnesses from the media. In my opinion it is advisable to consult with one’s physician regarding prevention, treatment and risks involved, then making an informed decision for themselves.

Some antivaxxers are even more radical in their insistence that others do not have this vaccine and others than those who support it are. Although it is human nature to tout what we believe, it is wrong to foist it on other folks.

This being an internet forum, folks tend to regularly go overboard when making a point. Some of Oak’s posts regarding COVID mandates, restrictions and vaccines exceed being just informational and become demanding. Of course, anyone can ignore what they disagree with.

[joswift]

Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on the show under false pretenses. He was scheduled to speak about statins. Instead, he aired his views claiming certain Covid vaccines could be behind excess deaths from coronary artery disease. He was being disingenuous at the least. -Don't know about you, but I have issues trusting people who are dishonest. 

The FDA requires the warning label include that there is a slight risk of heart related issues including blood clots for some people. All medications including aspirin have a (sometimes very long), list of possible side effects. It is up to the individual to determine if the medication is worth the risk.

Although I disagree with employers requiring people to get the vaccine (jab) to remain on the job, hanging them is overkill. The ACLU should defend these folk's right to refuse the jab because it is a violation of their rights.

I oppose any law designed to protect people from themselves, including the seatbelt law as applied to adults. A lot of folks disagree with me for a variety of reasons all of which can be disputed.

Personally, I appreciate getting information about viruses and illnesses from the media. In my opinion it is advisable to consult with one’s physician regarding prevention, treatment and risks involved, then making an informed decision for themselves.

Some antivaxxers are even more radical in their insistence that others do not have this vaccine and others than those who support it are. Although it is human nature to tout what we believe, it is wrong to foist it on other folks.

This being an internet forum, folks tend to regularly go overboard when making a point. Some of Oak’s posts regarding COVID mandates, restrictions and vaccines exceed being just informational and become demanding. Of course, anyone can ignore what they disagree with.

she asked him what he thought about NICE advice for people taking more statins

He told her

He doesnt want statins blamed for excess deaths because thats his field.

Statins reduce your cholesterol to the point where you can stop forming memories


Maybe statins are the cause of the rise in early onset dementia...

[Tapeworm]

Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on the show under false pretenses. He was scheduled to speak about statins. Instead, he aired his views claiming certain Covid vaccines could be behind excess deaths from coronary artery disease. He was being disingenuous at the least. -Don't know about you, but I have issues trusting people who are dishonest. 

The FDA requires the warning label include that there is a slight risk of heart related issues including blood clots for some people. All medications including aspirin have a (sometimes very long), list of possible side effects. It is up to the individual to determine if the medication is worth the risk.

Although I disagree with employers requiring people to get the vaccine (jab) to remain on the job, hanging them is overkill. The ACLU should defend these folk's right to refuse the jab because it is a violation of their rights.

I oppose any law designed to protect people from themselves, including the seatbelt law as applied to adults. A lot of folks disagree with me for a variety of reasons all of which can be disputed.

Personally, I appreciate getting information about viruses and illnesses from the media. In my opinion it is advisable to consult with one’s physician regarding prevention, treatment and risks involved, then making an informed decision for themselves.

Some antivaxxers are even more radical in their insistence that others do not have this vaccine and others than those who support it are. Although it is human nature to tout what we believe, it is wrong to foist it on other folks.

This being an internet forum, folks tend to regularly go overboard when making a point. Some of Oak’s posts regarding COVID mandates, restrictions and vaccines exceed being just informational and become demanding. Of course, anyone can ignore what they disagree with.

Dude. You've taken more shots than you were told you'd need. You and everyone else caught the disease which you were assured you couldn't catch. Your kid had a nasty experience along with tons of other people after all the promises about how safe it is.

What circumstances would have to materialize for you to say, "You know I'm starting to have my doubts about these things." Are there any circumstances? What exactly would it take?

[Primemuscle]

Dude. You've taken more shots than you were told you'd need. You and everyone else caught the disease which you were assured you couldn't catch. Your kid had a nasty experience along with tons of other people after all the promises about how safe it is.

What circumstances would have to materialize for you to say, "You know I'm starting to have my doubts about these things." Are there any circumstances? What exactly would it take?

I appreciate your concern for my health. I also honor your right to come to your own conclusions and make your own choices regarding the COVID vaccine.

I am not presently current on the COVID booster shots. Obviously, I have not taken more than recommended.

I don't recall ever being told the shots prevented COVID. What the CDC says is the shots reduce your risk of severe illness.

Most likely one of the six people living here caught COVID first, probably because of an increased exposure at his work where he was around a lot of people. In turn, we each caught COVID from one another because total quarantine while living in the same house is very difficult.

My daughter had an adverse reaction to the second COVID vaccine. Essentially, she got dehydrated to the point she had to go to urgent care where they gave her fluids intravenously to get her rehydrated and then released her. Scary stuff, to be sure, but not life threatening. Since then, she has stayed current on the boosters with no adverse reactions. As best as I know everyone here except me is current on boosters and there have been no additional adverse reactions to the vaccines. The only other person I know of out of many people having a bad reaction to the vaccine is my cousin who said she had flu symptoms for the day following the second vaccine.

I am aware of the possibility of a negative reaction to the vaccine. Weighing this against my having several comorbidities which increase the likelihood of serious respiratory problems, I believe that for me being vaccinated is worth risking the possible side effects of the vaccine. I also believe had I not been vaccinated; I would probably have had a much worse experience than I did when I had COVID. I ended up having pneumococcal pneumonia much as I usually do whenever I catch a cold. Fortunately, it was treatable with two rounds of antibiotics. I also had an inner ear problem which has subsided, but there is no way to know for sure if it was caused by having COVID.

So, to answer your question, I doubt there are any circumstances that would result in my having second thoughts about my decisions regarding the COVID vaccine. Even if I were to get a blood clot and have a stroke which was proven to be due to the vaccine, I would not regret my decision to be vaccinated, although I would probably not continue having boosters.
   
   

[Tapeworm]

Ok. So you don't feel at all disappointed or that the manufacturers of the vaccines over promised and under delivered? Fair to say, in your judgement, that things are basically right on track?

[Flexacon]

Ok. So you don't feel at all disappointed or that the manufacturers of the vaccines over promised and under delivered? Fair to say, in your judgement, that things are basically right on track?

2 caveats. The vaccines did work better against the strains that were around at the time the original claims were made. It was a short window. Max 6 months maybe.

AstraZeneca didn't make the outrageous claims about the efficacy of their vaccine. It was considerably cheaper than the Pfizer and Moderna MRNA vaccines and produced comparable results. That also pushed the MRNA vaccines  to over promise.

Boosters are the bigger scam.

[Tapeworm]

I seem to remember a claim that 2 shots (or 1 of AZ/J&J) meant you couldn't catch it or spread it. I seem to remember that as a basis for mandates. But Prime doesn't remember hearing that. It's interesting.

[Flexacon]

I seem to remember a claim that 2 shots (or 1 of AZ/J&J) meant you couldn't catch it or spread it. I seem to remember that as a basis for mandates. But Prime doesn't remember hearing that. It's interesting.

That was the claim made by the MRNA vaccine manufacturers and also a bunch of politicians and "health professionals". From what I can remember AZ never claimed that. Not sure about J&J

Prime bro is talking out of his ass if he is claiming otherwise as I posted and reposted it several times that he'd end up getting covid no matter how many shots he'd get. He wanted to believe otherwise. He got covid..

[Tapeworm]

Well, whatever. I just wanted to know if he feels disappointed by these products and it sounds like he doesn't.

Myself, I think it's shaping up to be the worst medical fuck up in history by a wide margin but it's interesting to hear a different point of view.

[ROBOAK]

Well, whatever. I just wanted to know if he feels disappointed by these products and it sounds like he doesn't.

Myself, I think it's shaping up to be the worst medical fuck up in history by a wide margin but it's interesting to hear a different point of view.

lol, there is no "fuck up" every thing was by design,eventually even the most naive will come to this conclusion....

[Primemuscle]

2 caveats. The vaccines did work better against the strains that were around at the time the original claims were made. It was a short window. Max 6 months maybe.

AstraZeneca didn't make the outrageous claims about the efficacy of their vaccine. It was considerably cheaper than the Pfizer and Moderna MRNA vaccines and produced comparable results. That also pushed the MRNA vaccines  to over promise.

Boosters are the bigger scam.

I don't know that boosters are a scam, but I waited year between the two boosters. Some health experts suggest more time between boosters—up to six months. My decision to do this was not based on science but on personal preference. One booster a year, like with the flu vaccine should be sufficient... if not, c'est la vie!