Why did Bast get banned again?I

[FitnessFrenzy]

I am not defending him, I am just curious as to why he was banned...

[Flexacon]

I am not defending him, I am just curious as to why he was banned...

Why did he originally get banned?

The Ron poll wasn't a smart move...

[Rambone]

He knows too much

[wes]

He hung around with Matt.....instant condemnation.

[Matt]

He hung around with Matt.....instant condemnation.

Don't you have enough feuds with other members on here to drag me into it, wes?

Can't you go interact with Fallsview or something?

As for Bast, he was on a bit of a posting frenzy early on, and bashed Ron on his body weight. But I don't know...I could be wrong.

[OneMoreRep]

Although I wasn't involved with his banning, reports from the committee suggest that BAST might have made numerous posts supporting pedophilia and also might have made mention in one of those YouTube videos that was posted on this site that he supported the idea of pedophilia. This is what I have gathered from reports I have read.

Bashing of Ron doesn't help, but Ron doesn't ban people. You would have to literally call Ron's house and threaten his wife and kids for him to ban you (yes, that has happened before). Otherwise, Ron lets practically everything go.

As a moderator team, we have a strong consensus on the (B)ast majority of things. We tend to agree on these types of matters, even if someone made the decision to press the ban button on their own, they do so knowing that the infraction clearly shows the member needs time off or a permanent ban. Our crew is pretty experienced with managing the forum and we tend to be super fair. I also let almost everything go with some exceptions, but if the crew feels strongly for something, we all take a unilateral stance and support each other's decisions.

"1"

[FitnessFrenzy]

For those of you who have not yet watched the youtube video with Bast, his friend and Matt C, I would recommend it. While Matt C is talking, he is interrupted, and he almost shouts to them" You may speak when I am done". Absolute gold 

[Hypertrophy]

What's with these morons and pedophilia? Is it just to test the limits of the forum? If not, these sick fuckers should be put down.

[JustPlaneJane]

Although I wasn't involved with his banning, reports from the committee suggest that BAST might have made numerous posts supporting pedophilia and also might have made mention in one of those YouTube videos that was posted on this site that he supported the idea of pedophilia. This is what I have gathered from reports I have read.

Bashing of Ron doesn't help, but Ron doesn't ban people. You would have to literally call Ron's house and threaten his wife and kids for him to ban you (yes, that has happened before). Otherwise, Ron lets practically everything go.

As a moderator team, we have a strong consensus on the (B)ast majority of things. We tend to agree on these types of matters, even if someone made the decision to press the ban button on their own, they do so knowing that the infraction clearly shows the member needs time off or a permanent ban. Our crew is pretty experienced with managing the forum and we tend to be super fair. I also let almost everything go with some exceptions, but if the crew feels strongly for something, we all take a unilateral stance and support each other's decisions.

"1"

Hey NYShizzo, how long have Matt and Bast been dating ?

[FitnessFrenzy]

I don't know Bast personally, but his behaviour recently has certainly not been appealing.

[JustPlaneJane]

I don't know Bast personally, but his behaviour recently has certainly not been appealing.

Well you find TBombz sexually appealing, so you are a wee bit creepy.

😜

[deadz]

Although I wasn't involved with his banning, reports from the committee suggest that BAST might have made numerous posts supporting pedophilia and also might have made mention in one of those YouTube videos that was posted on this site that he supported the idea of pedophilia. This is what I have gathered from reports I have read.

Bashing of Ron doesn't help, but Ron doesn't ban people. You would have to literally call Ron's house and threaten his wife and kids for him to ban you (yes, that has happened before). Otherwise, Ron lets practically everything go.

As a moderator team, we have a strong consensus on the (B)ast majority of things. We tend to agree on these types of matters, even if someone made the decision to press the ban button on their own, they do so knowing that the infraction clearly shows the member needs time off or a permanent ban. Our crew is pretty experienced with managing the forum and we tend to be super fair. I also let almost everything go with some exceptions, but if the crew feels strongly for something, we all take a unilateral stance and support each other's decisions.

"1"

We appreciate your diligence regarding this matter.

[ThisisOverload]

Bast and Matt were annoying as fuck.

Like two little parrots running around the board licking each others dicks.

I tried watching the videos they posted but couldn't make it 10 minutes.

[Matt C]

Although I wasn't involved with his banning, reports from the committee suggest that BAST might have made numerous posts supporting pedophilia and also might have made mention in one of those YouTube videos that was posted on this site that he supported the idea of pedophilia. This is what I have gathered from reports I have read.

Bashing of Ron doesn't help, but Ron doesn't ban people. You would have to literally call Ron's house and threaten his wife and kids for him to ban you (yes, that has happened before). Otherwise, Ron lets practically everything go.

As a moderator team, we have a strong consensus on the (B)ast majority of things. We tend to agree on these types of matters, even if someone made the decision to press the ban button on their own, they do so knowing that the infraction clearly shows the member needs time off or a permanent ban. Our crew is pretty experienced with managing the forum and we tend to be super fair. I also let almost everything go with some exceptions, but if the crew feels strongly for something, we all take a unilateral stance and support each other's decisions.

"1"

Although I don't think poking fun at Ron's body weight has always resulted in bans [if ever], I personally took issue with Bast coming in here and within ten posts, bashing Ron.

Not cool.

I don't know...to me, it isn't cool to bash someone for their BMI in a baseless fashion.  If Ron had bashed Bast first, I would say it would have been fair game.  I guess I just don't understand personal attacks, unless they are in self-defense.

And Bast also posted a whole bunch of new threads right off the bast.

In a way that seemed spam-like.  I felt it was personally a bit much.  But it was the Ron-bashing that I felt triggered the ban.  It's one thing to make critiques in a constructive way, or to respond to a personal attack - I just don't know why anyone would get on a board and bash the board owner right off the bat, on something as petty as body weight at that, and expect to be posting for long.

Too bad about that.  I told him I'd check in to why he was banned.  I did...so that's that.  I'm not sure what he expected.

I think he felt that Getbig has an "anything goes" attitude - and while it superficially seems that way, there are still rules [i.e., no bashing someone's wife/family, and other rules like that].  So it's not exactly a free-for-all, even though it sometimes seems that way.

[Matt C]

Bast and Matt were annoying as fuck.

Like two little parrots running around the board licking each others dicks.

I tried watching the videos they posted but couldn't make it 10 minutes.

The topic was supposed to be [among other things] why TA got banned.  Then after I went into detail about age of consent laws in North America and worldwide, Bast's idiot friend chimes in about climate change, claiming that the podcast has no topic, so we can talk about anything.

Having no topic doesn't mean responding to a comment about age of consent with some jibberish about climate change.  It means to stay on topic, and segue into other topics in a fluid way.

The other thing both Bast and his friend did was to talk over each other constantly.  When I have something to say, it's because I know plenty of details, and it's my intention to talk until my point is made.

There's also an intelligent way to interrupt someone - like, you can say "And...", then wait to see if the other person STOPS speaking.  What both the dumb fucks Bast and Dino did were to just go on talking as I was clearly still talking.  Normally when you interrupt someone and they are STILL talking, you stop and that person is then prompted with the knowledge that someone else wants to speak, sort of as a que to keep things short, and stop talking, to let the rest get their words in.

But no, they would just start talking as I was clearly making a coherent point.

It's also ok to interrupt when someone talks to much, but there is a way to do that to.  These idiots were both just talking over each over.  Absolute children, both of them.

Very disappointing.

I guess Bast's point was that a person wouldn't get banned from Facebook for saying "I think Ted Bundy did nothing wrong" - and TA said [from his own mouth, in a recent e-mail] said that he said "Jeffrey Epstein did nothing wrong."

Child sex trafficking isn't wrong? 

I think the point is, Getbig is known as a free-for-all speech forum - but it's not known to support pedophilia.  There ARE rules.

Had Bast and Dino just shut the fuck up, we could have figured it out.

Somewhere late in this podcast, the guest Dino brought on asked Bast to stop interrupting him:

Phlebbbbbtt🖕🏼🖕🏼🖕🏼 Fuck off

Getbig should do a podcast with Getbiggers.  As long as some BASIC DECORUM is followed.

I'll go back on Dino's podcast one last time, but if he's going to be a child, constantly talking over people while they are making points, then fuck that - I'll go back to making videos for my YouTube channels.

[CalvinH]

Although I wasn't involved with his banning, reports from the committee suggest that BAST might have made numerous posts supporting pedophilia and also might have made mention in one of those YouTube videos that was posted on this site that he supported the idea of pedophilia. This is what I have gathered from reports I have read.

Bashing of Ron doesn't help, but Ron doesn't ban people. You would have to literally call Ron's house and threaten his wife and kids for him to ban you (yes, that has happened before). Otherwise, Ron lets practically everything go.

As a moderator team, we have a strong consensus on the (B)ast majority of things. We tend to agree on these types of matters, even if someone made the decision to press the ban button on their own, they do so knowing that the infraction clearly shows the member needs time off or a permanent ban. Our crew is pretty experienced with managing the forum and we tend to be super fair. I also let almost everything go with some exceptions, but if the crew feels strongly for something, we all take a unilateral stance and support each other's decisions.

"1"

I am not defending him, I am just curious as to why he was banned...

He posted a pic of a 12 year old child in a bikini and said she was the girlfriend of a 30s or maybe 40s year old man.

[Earl1972]

what was dino's getbig username?

E

[JustPlaneJane]

He posted a pic of a 12 year old child in a bikini and said she was the girlfriend of a 30s or maybe 40s year old man.

Wait wut ?

Sorry Jane, had to remove your gif as it had a child featured and there are some sick fucks lurking here

[Henda]

In the video with Matt and some other bloke bast claimed it wrong that someone should be banned from getbig if it became apparent they had past conviction of peadophillia citing a murderer likley wouldn’t get banned and thst this is unfair. Or something along those lines I only listened for a few minutes

[JustPlaneJane]

In the video with Matt and some other bloke bast claimed it wrong that someone should be banned from getbig if it became apparent they had past conviction of peadophillia citing a murderer likley wouldn’t get banned and thst this is unfair. Or something along those lines I only listened for a few minutes

In the video is Matt the top or the bottom ?

Hi Henda !   🙋‍♀️

We found a good home for the puppy I found. I went back home so I didn’t email for a while. I think my “dog sitter” slept in my bed and used my shower. The lazy fat fucker. I’m trying to figure out how to bet on the Super Bowl. It’s a big deal over here, and it’s on Sunday.

[robcguns]

In the video with Matt and some other bloke bast claimed it wrong that someone should be banned from getbig if it became apparent they had past conviction of peadophillia citing a murderer likley wouldn’t get banned and thst this is unfair. Or something along those lines I only listened for a few minutes

How the FUCK does anyone stick up for a fucking pedophile? They should be disemboweled on site. Murderers some have good reason so that’s different.

[chaos]

In the video is Matt the top or the bottom ?

Hi Henda !   🙋‍♀️

We found a good home for the puppy I found. I went back home so I didn’t email for a while. I think my “dog sitter” slept in my bed and used my shower. The lazy fat fucker. I’m trying to figure out how to bet on the Super Bowl. It’s a big deal over here, and it’s on Sunday.

You get what you pay for.

How the FUCK does anyone stick up for a fucking pedophile? They should be disemboweled on site. Murderers some have good reason so that’s different.

x2 Cinder block to the dome.

[CalvinH]

Wait wut ?

Yup,He posted a pic of a 12 year old child and said it was True Adonis girlfriend. If you didn't know TA was adult male poster banned for pedo talk.
I also asked for matt to be at least be put in time out for putting up that Youtube with bast in it seeing he knew he was banned and still found away to get him back on the board.

[Vince B]

Although I wasn't involved with his banning, reports from the committee suggest that BAST might have made numerous posts supporting pedophilia and also might have made mention in one of those YouTube videos that was posted on this site that he supported the idea of pedophilia. This is what I have gathered from reports I have read.

Bashing of Ron doesn't help, but Ron doesn't ban people. You would have to literally call Ron's house and threaten his wife and kids for him to ban you (yes, that has happened before). Otherwise, Ron lets practically everything go.

As a moderator team, we have a strong consensus on the (B)ast majority of things. We tend to agree on these types of matters, even if someone made the decision to press the ban button on their own, they do so knowing that the infraction clearly shows the member needs time off or a permanent ban. Our crew is pretty experienced with managing the forum and we tend to be super fair. I also let almost everything go with some exceptions, but if the crew feels strongly for something, we all take a unilateral stance and support each other's decisions.

"1"

I take exception to this post. Why on earth has the team "a strong consensus on the vast majority of things"? If that is true why do you need more than one moderator?

 "...we tend to be super fair." Yes, sure you do. Over the past two decades the policy seems to be to let people put shit on those the moderators don't like. OMR came out recently praising Goodrum! WTF is that? Goodrum is a certified low life and there was OMR giving him a testimonial. When assholes like Goodrum are lauded on Getbig then nobody is safe.

[Matt C]

Yup,He posted a pic of a 12 year old child and said it was True Adonis girlfriend. If you didn't know TA was adult male poster banned for pedo talk.
I also asked for matt to be at least be put in time out for putting up that Youtube with bast in it seeing he knew he was banned and still found away to get him back on the board.

Is that a rule here?

If that's a rule - so be it.  Providing that the rules are fairly objective, I'm not one to complain too much about them.

So is it a rule that we can't talk about Getbig's departed board members?  Or specifically post videos about them, or...?

No problem on my end.