Common sense?! LMAO! What's more likely? 19 Arabs hijacked 4 planes and flew them into 3 buildings, one of which was the Pentagon? Or 911 was an inside job with the goal being the launch of numerous wars in the middle east to steal resources?
The Pentagon attack video does not show an airplane but a missile. There were no skid marks on the lawn which would have occurred if a plane dragged across the front and into the lower level. The reality is it was a missile that blows a hole in the entire "story" the Deep State tried to sell.
Now it turns out some of these so-called 911 hijackers were CIA recruits lol!?
Wake up, moron. The "Empire of Lies" is full of lies. It's like Hollywood. All smoke and mirrors. You can't believe anything peddled by the USA in the past 50 years or more.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/bombshell-filing-911-hijackers-were-cia-recruits/5816424
https://www.floridabulldog.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Canestraro-Declaration-dated-20-July-2021.pdf
It is not like you are asking a biased and rhetorical question, or anything.
I doubt any manner of proof would change your faulty thinking or use of questionable resources. So I won't try. But for other more reasonable folks who don't base their opinions of a host of false conspiracy theories, there is a more to your ridiculous and dangerous post than meets the eye for anyone willing to do a little research.
My answer is that it is more likely that the video shows American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001, not a missile.
No doubt you would prefer we believe misinformation peddled by crackpots and Russian intelligence than any information from coming from the U.S.
Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), which runs the website globalresearch.ca, founded in 2001, which publishes falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Michel Chossudovsky has promoted conspiracy theories about 9/11.
In 2017, the Centre for Research on Globalization was accused by information warfare specialists at NATO’s Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (STRATCOM) of playing a key role in the spread of pro-Russian propaganda. A report by the U.S. State Department in August 2020 accused the website of being a proxy for a Russian disinformation campaign.
Chossudovsky's academic research kept him "on the margins of mainstream academia," but won praise from anti-establishment intellectuals such as Noam Chomsky. In 2005, shortly after Chossudovsky began writing about terrorism, the Citizen reported that Chossudovsky's was "a popular figure among anti-globalization activists,"
Additional reading:
https://www.thecipherbrief.com/column_article/911-commission-director-no-evidence-cia-sought-recruit-future-911-hijackers
