« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right  (Read 13917 times)

ether

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2314
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #25 on: April 24, 2006, 04:00:25 PM »
Quote from: bailey on April 24, 2006, 02:15:53 PM
Dante: When you start a thread In the manner of which you titled
It. You better bring It on, with an awesome backshot from Gary
Strydom.. ( Which you did not!!!! ) All I am saying is don't start a thread on the mans back when there are no pics what's so ever to justify him having one. Don't get me wrong. I love Strydoms physique from the front, but anyone can see, ( depleted or not ) like Nasser.
His back did not hold up !

You can't compare this douche bag to Nasser.....he might look better than him now, but, in his day....Nasser was fucking HUGE and deserved to have at least one 0.

He OWNED dorian from the front.

Logged

bailey

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
  • Getbig!
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #26 on: April 24, 2006, 04:04:35 PM »
Agreed. 1997..
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79227
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #27 on: April 24, 2006, 04:13:23 PM »
I have the coverage from one of the WBF's championships and not one single back shot of Strydom  ???
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #28 on: April 24, 2006, 04:16:22 PM »
as amazing as Gary was, he suffered from Dorian Syndrome: really weak biceps for the rest of his frame.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79227
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #29 on: April 24, 2006, 04:24:30 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on April 24, 2006, 04:16:22 PM
as amazing as Gary was, he suffered from Dorian Syndrome: really weak biceps for the rest of his frame.

LOL really weak  ::)
Logged

bailey

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
  • Getbig!
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #30 on: April 24, 2006, 04:33:10 PM »
Gary's don't look so " week " either. WTF !
Logged

Al-Gebra

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #31 on: April 24, 2006, 05:15:49 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 24, 2006, 04:13:23 PM
I have the coverage from one of the WBF's championships and not one single back shot of Strydom  ???

funny thing about the pic you posted is that there's a photog in it . . . who's clearly taking a photograph of his back. 
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79227
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #32 on: April 24, 2006, 05:23:16 PM »
Quote from: Al-Gebra on April 24, 2006, 05:15:49 PM
funny thing about the pic you posted is that there's a photog in it . . . who's clearly taking a photograph of his back. 

LOL I didn't even notice that , but it wasn't in the coverage from I believe Ironman where I scanned those pics .
Logged

Gord

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1788
  • Smile when you say that
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #33 on: April 24, 2006, 06:10:35 PM »
A couple of back shots, or more accurately video stills.

Logged
Lies, damn lies and diets

Al-Gebra

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #34 on: April 24, 2006, 06:37:12 PM »
Quote from: Al-Gebra on April 24, 2006, 11:51:41 AM


I love how everyone posts solo shots in other threads and says, "Wooo . . . look at that back." We need comparisons.  Jay Cutler is probably one of the two widest men in bb . . . if Cutler stood next to him in a back shot, it would be like a 707 (gary, although he is taller) standing next to a 747 (cutler).

hth
Logged

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #35 on: April 24, 2006, 10:20:11 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 24, 2006, 04:24:30 PM
LOL really weak  ::)

  That's a great shot of Dorian's arms. Unfortunately, there are far more where his arms are less than impressive.
Logged

Dante

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #36 on: May 04, 2006, 04:35:20 PM »
hello everybody,  Dante is back,  sorry about that, my computer was down,


Id like to set a few things straight,  Gary Strydom is one of the best bodybuilders in the world, not to take anything away from Jay Cutler or Ronnie Coleman   but Gary's purpose to the comeback is to bring back the reality to bodybuilding,  to bring back symmetry, and athleticism,  not the freakazoid big bellyed look that many top pros possess today.  He wants to bring youngsters the hopes and reality that they can achieve a beautiful body without unrealistic proportions and disgusting guts that are the results of improper nutrition as well as heavy drug use.  We need more guys like Gary to help save our sport
Logged

3Dkiller

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1533
  • Fuck The New World Order
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #37 on: May 04, 2006, 04:50:39 PM »
Quote from: jaejonna on April 24, 2006, 01:51:11 PM
Strydoms nick name was "Copperfield".... cause when he turned to his back.... HE DISAPPEARED

rofl good one;D
Logged
TEAM WOLF

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7224
  • Getbig!
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #38 on: May 04, 2006, 04:53:28 PM »
Strydom's back really suck
Like Ronnie's gut or calves......

overall I like Strydom better!!!
Logged

Dante

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #39 on: May 04, 2006, 08:20:03 PM »
This is in response to the idiot who said you cant compare Gary to Nassar,  you are right you cant,  Gary blows him away,  again you guys are brain washed by mass not pretty physiques.  So sad,  Strydom please save our sport
Logged

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #40 on: May 04, 2006, 08:22:17 PM »
Quote from: Dante on May 04, 2006, 08:20:03 PM
This is in response to the idiot who said you cant compare Gary to Nassar,  you are right you cant,  Gary blows him away,  again you guys are brain washed by mass not pretty physiques.  So sad,  Strydom please save our sport

Strydom better than Nasser??? Have you seen Nasser from 96 or 97???
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79227
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #41 on: May 07, 2006, 09:54:57 AM »
They posted a few back pics of Strydom on Ironage and his back while a lot wider than is 88 Olympia appearance still isn't up to Olympia standards
Logged

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #42 on: May 07, 2006, 09:57:50 AM »
so his lat spread looks ok... but his rear double bicep looks sooo small... I think he just lacked a bit of muscular control.
Logged

bigmikecox

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14159
  • SAY MY NAME!!!!
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #43 on: May 07, 2006, 10:03:38 AM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 24, 2006, 12:29:11 AM
This is why people say Gary has no back , in all fairness Gary was very depleted for this contest and not as big as he normally was but whats ironic is even when he was heavier there aren't any pic of him doing this shot .

Gary wasn't depleted at the 89 Arnold and his back was still lacking
Logged

NotMrAverage

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2168
  • SCHPORT
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #44 on: May 07, 2006, 10:43:22 AM »
This is the first time EVER i´ve seen pictures of his back, kinda explains why too. His rear db-biceps make him look like a kid...scary.
Logged
MIRAGETROPIN

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #45 on: May 07, 2006, 12:43:22 PM »
Quote from: NotMrAverage on May 07, 2006, 10:43:22 AM
This is the first time EVER i´ve seen pictures of his back, kinda explains why too. His rear db-biceps make him look like a kid...scary.
more like an npc competitor
Logged

hillbilly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
  • LOOK! the crazy cat is back and packing a gat!
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #46 on: May 07, 2006, 12:47:31 PM »
Wow thats a serious front to back imbalance

lets hope that all these years have improved matters

seems unlikely given his new pics still dont include back shots
Logged

MisterMagoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5591
  • And now, what joy will I have left to live for?
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #47 on: May 07, 2006, 02:15:28 PM »
that left lat is about half the size of the right. might be the worst side to side asymmetry i've ever seen that wasn't a torn muscle.
Logged

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #48 on: May 07, 2006, 02:26:46 PM »
Quote from: MisterMagoo on May 07, 2006, 02:15:28 PM
that left lat is about half the size of the right. might be the worst side to side asymmetry i've ever seen that wasn't a torn muscle.

I just think he lacks muscular control
Logged

phyxsius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6264
  • Mini Getbigger
Re: Gary Strydom, no back, yeah right
« Reply #49 on: May 08, 2006, 03:37:40 AM »
Quote from: WOOO on May 07, 2006, 02:26:46 PM
I just think he lacks muscular control

Agree
Logged
I am a mini beast
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »