I would be more inclined to think the testing was fake.
NBC wouldn't risk a steroid scandal for a nothing celebrity like O'Hearn, especially in 2008 when they had the Olympics. You have to remember O'Hearn is barely a celebrity outside the bodybuilding cult.
My point with the thread was not that O'Hearn is lifetime natty, it's that 2008 proves he HAS used PED'S, as 2008 is what he looks like off. The main argument for his lifetime natty status is that he's always in the same shape. size and condition. But find ANY pic from him in 2008 and he'll look like a bodybuilder who is off for a while. Because 2008 was the only time in his career he genuinely was OFF.
Here's Arnold off, as most guys in the 70s, from Arnold to Drasin, did cycles for the show season, then went off the rest of the year and maintained the best they could for TV shows and modeling, which didn't require contest shape. And he looks like O'Hearn off. This is what bodybuilders look like when they are truly OFF. So 2008 PROVES O'Hearn is
not lifetime natty because it can't be coincidence that he was the smallest and least ripped of his career the one time he was tested for an extended period(or threatened to be tested).
2008 is the smoking gun that O' Hearn isn't lifetime natty as there's no photo of him ripped from that year. Maintaining that size/bodyfat is doable for a year or two natty with proper diet and training and a solid steroid built base.