That was all for show. Hitler did nothing to take out the Rothschilds. Hitler was a descendant of a Rothschild. Go read up on it. He even had his opposition murdered after he uncovered some truths about Hitler. Hitler ignored the orders of his generals which led to Germany's defeat. He wasn't even German himself. Hitler was a snake in the grass and his purpose was to weaken Germany and accelerate the demographic decline of Caucasians. This forced decline via war casualties then set the stage for the third world flooding to follow after the dust settled.
I can post some info here for you but don't have time right now. However the info is out there for you to find.
https://www.history.com/news/study-suggests-adolf-hitler-had-jewish-and-african-ancestors
I've read the "Hitler was a Rothschild" theories, but there is no objective primary source evidence to verify it.
You are right about Hitler not listening to his generals - I was just telling a friend today that if he had allowed his generals to make certain key decisions in WWII that Germany would have won.
Here's a question though:
If Hitler was NOT controlled opposition, and was actively opposed to Jewish global financial supremacy [as I suspect he actually was, as opposed to your view that he was a Rothschild / controlled opposition], wouldn't the result be the same?
Had Germany won the war, that would be a separate discussion. But since he lost, it paved the way for endless White Guilt brought to us by the Jewish press.
But why would Hitler have to be a Rothschild for this to happen? The winners always write history. By losing WWII, Hitler and Nazi Germany got to be an example that Jewish media will hold up as an example of evil White Supremacy to brow beat and demean Whites for as long as it has any traction.
But my question is: why does that necessarily prove that that was Hitler's purpose?
Couldn't it just be that Hitler meant what he said, wanted to put German ethic interests first, failed [by losing the war], and will be used as an example of how evil White people are for as long as that narrative can run?
Why does that result necessarily mean that Hitler intended for that to happen, and was an active Jewish plant?
This is why I think Hitler was exactly what he said he was - a German nationalist who took on the Jewish banks, lost, and - as is the case for all those vanquished in war - will forever be the accused, and used to foment hate against White people to advance the multiculturalism agenda until Whites are extinct [2150].
IMO, Jewish elites used the USSR to attempt to genocide Whites directly, and started this off by starving Germans. This resulted in Hitler and The Holocaust, and at that point, it became clear that Whites *cannot* be taken out by warfare.
Whites will now be taken out by way of a slow racial attrition [by Jewish media pushing abortion + multiculturalism / endless immigration] because Whites cannot be destroyed by war.
What I think is that Whites would have been taken out by warfare, and this was started by attempting to take out our strongest people [Germans], but that this failed epically with the rise of Hitler, and Jews then had to default by reducing White people by stealth - via the ways I outlined above, that are being pushed in ALL White nations.
While I do think Hitler is ultimately the reason why those methods are being pushed so successfully [because of White Guilt], I also believe that it was because of Hitler that these methods HAD to be adopted by Jews, as an evolutionary strategy.
Again, because Whites can't be taken out by traditional warfare means.
Basically, I think Whites and Jews are playing an evolutionary game of racial tennis, but that neither group has the means to take the other out.
I sort of look at it as an evolutionary arms race now - ALL groups ultimately attempt to outcompete the other. Whites are very good at this, and Jews - given their small size - are probably the best at this in the world.
If you haven't seen it, I recommend the 1988 Oliver Stone movie "Talk Radio", starring Eric Bogosian.
After spending so much time talking to White Supremacists on his show [who brought up good points which would NEVER be allowed in a movie today], Eric ended with a statement [paraphrased] that I think describes the relation between Whites and Jews:
"I guess we're stuck with each other."
I agree with that - and it's only my hope that the conflicting interests between Whites and Jews never boil over again to the point of another Holocaust or Holodomor [Bolshevism].
One thing I learned while being targeted for a year as an unvaccinated person supposedly responsible for a lethal pandemic is this:
It seems to me that all it takes is one unified message blaming a group of people for a crisis [even one that is massively hyped, and largely perceived], for rafts of people in a society to hate those people.
I think on some level, Jews have evolved to know that's all it takes - one switch in the collective switch, and BOOM - the entire Gentile population is out for blood.
One of my "antisemitic" friends once told me that if antisemitism ever rises to a fever pitch again, it is actually going to be me who is trying to tell people not to be irrationally antisemitic.
One could call me antisemitic - but never in my wildest dreams would I want to see Jewish families [women and children] slaughtered over the crimes of the Rothschilds and other Jewish elites.
This pandemic has also shown me in vivid detail how wildly irrational people will be, just because they are TOLD that a group of people [the unvaccinated] are responsible for a threat - even a massively hyped one like the pandemic.
It's really disturbing to me how people just toe the media line, simply at the sign of a potential existential threat.
I hope I don't live to see any of this stuff reach a boiling point ever again. Sadly, I think I probably will...
