Vaccine found to cause 84% increase in DEATH for men ages 18-39

[Gym-Rat]

Vaccine found to cause 84% increase in DEATH for men ages 18-39

https://thepostmillennial.com/florida-surgeon-general-covid-mrna-vaccine-found-to-cause-84-increase-in-death-for-men-ages-18-39?utm_campaign=64483


The findings also showed that "Males over the age of 60 had a 10% increased risk of cardiac-related death within 28 days of mRNA vaccination," and that "Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have these increased risks among any population.

[IroNat]

Where's Oak to refute this?

[The Keto Kid]

My doctor buddy sent me this article...crazy.

[Grape Ape]

Twitter apparently removed it.

[Super Natural]

[IroNat]

Campbell walking the tightrope to avoid cancelling.

[G_Thang]

Vaccine found to cause 84% increase in DEATH for men ages 18-39 "Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have these increased risks among any population.[/b][/color][/font]

Basically, just get the standard flu shot for Covid since Covid borged one of the eight common cold viruses even though there are no cures or vaccines for the common cold viruses.  Hence, is there a cure for a virus that mimics them?   At least the flu vaccines are safe and effective for a perfectly healthy person. Then again, the flu virus isn't one of the common cold viruses. A lot of ineffective vaccines for perfectly healthy people.  How effective is the natural immune system?

[OAK]

Where's Oak to refute this?

Proven wrong over 6 months ago!

Sorry antivaxxers you struck out again.

Better luck next time.

😆😆😆

[funk51]

Proven wrong over 6 months ago!

Sorry antivaxxers you struck out again.

Better luck next time.

😆😆😆

  we all know how easily numbers can be manipulated to prove an invalid point.

[Gym-Rat]

  we all know how easily numbers can be manipulated to prove an invalid point.

Again, why the meme's, the trolling? I thought you didnt like these posts?
I dont want to argue with you and told you I was sorry I attacked you, but you seem to still click and troll things you dont like.

I know I dont read posts I dont want to read. And siding with Oak (nothing personal Oak) but he's the laughing stock of the forum, and maybe the internet.
You both argue with foolish meme's, when there is actual data out there. Im sorry, but pretty braindead...

[OAK]

Again, why the meme's, the trolling? I thought you didnt like these posts?
I dont want to argue with you and told you I was sorry I attacked you, but you seem to still click and troll things you dont like.

I know I dont read posts I dont want to read. And siding with Oak (nothing personal Oak) but he's the laughing stock of the forum, and maybe the internet.
You both argue with foolish meme's, when there is actual data out there. Im sorry, but pretty braindead...

No facts.

Just personal insults.

We ALL know what that means.

😎

[Grape Ape]

Since I can't see Oak's posts, I'm going to assume he's responding with memes and other bullshit.

However, so we can all learn, this is the methodology utilized in the Florida study:

SCCS method
The SCCS method aims to estimate a relative incidence, which compares the incidence of adverse events within periods of hypothesised excess risk due to exposure with incidence during all other times. Asking “when?” rather than “who?” becomes the key question. Precise timings are needed, so the SCCS method is best suited to acute events and transient exposures for which periods of exposure risk can be clearly defined. Only those who have experienced an event (cases) can contribute any information on when the event occurred, so only data on these individuals need to be collected.

Having identified cases, the next step in setting up the data for SCCS is to define observation periods—these are the study periods for each individual, over which a full history on the timing of events and exposures are available. The third step is to define the periods when exposure may have had an impact within the observation period, eg, a fixed number of days after receipt of a first drug prescription or a vaccine; these are known as exposure risk periods. All remaining time within the observation period constitutes baseline exposure periods, to which the exposure risk periods will be compared. Studies using SCCS might include multiple exposure risk periods as it may be necessary to capture either multiple doses or varying exposure related risk using several risk periods (which may be of the same or different lengths). Observation periods can be further divided according to age groups or seasons, or any other relevant time varying factors so they can be accounted for in the analysis. The fourth step is to “map” events in relation to the different periods identified. Once the data are set up, the final step is to estimate the relative incidence of events in prespecified exposure risk periods compared with baseline periods, while taking into account the effect of any time varying confounders such as age groups (see supplementary file).

[OAK]

Since I can't see Oak's posts, I'm going to assume he's responding with memes and other bullshit.

However, so we can all learn, this is the methodology utilized in the Florida study:

Blocking me was the smartest thing you ever did.

You can’t lose an argument if you IGNORE all conflicting evidence.

😎😎😎

[Grape Ape]

Can't see Oak's reponse, but have to guess it was a meme or an insult.  Not really sure which.  Maybe both.

What I AM confident on is it wasn't a counterpoint, or anything backed by science or data.

[OAK]

Can't see Oak's reponse, but have to guess it was a meme or an insult.  Not really sure which.  Maybe both.

In other words.

The SAME response that ALL GetBiggers give to you posts.

😎

[Irongrip400]

What is it about the vaccine that affects younger people but not old?

[jude2]

Twitter apparently removed it.

They did not like the Black Dr in Florida who did the study, so they took him down. Freedom of speech. lol

[Never1AShow]

30% of the population still believes all the lies about Covid even though masking and vaccination numbers are way way down.  Anyone with a cough or a sniffle who doesn't act like it's Armageddon is labelled as an enemy of the state and purveyor of misinformation.

Nothing ever needed to be shut down, it was and still is something most dangerous to the very old, sick or very obese.

With little masking, and vaccine and booster numbers cratered by now, we should have been seeing massive spikes in death numbers across the population.  But we are not.

[Grape Ape]

What is it about the vaccine that affects younger people but not old?

Irongrip40IQ not doing his own research in this thread

[Irongrip400]

Irongrip40IQ not doing his own research in this thread

Sorry broseph, this page is like my own personal “Quora”. I don’t leave getbig, all info is read, scrubbed and processed via these great threads and opinions then formed based on this newly acquired knowledge. It is then passed along at dinner parties as gospel to my circle of friends.

[OAK]

Irongrip40IQ not doing his own research in this thread

He learned that from you.

🙂

[Grape Ape]

Sorry broseph, this page is like my own personal “Quora”. I don’t leave getbig, all info is read, scrubbed and processed via these great threads and opinions then formed based on this newly acquired knowledge. It is then passed along at dinner parties as gospel to my circle of friends.

[Grape Ape]

Also, twitter did take a day, but the Surgeon General's tweet is back up.

[BlackMetallic]

Blocking me was the smartest thing you ever did.

You can’t lose an argument if you IGNORE all conflicting evidence.

😎😎😎

Grow up

What are you 12?

[Super Natural]

.