HAHAHAHAHA!!
What a delusional dumbass. You're such a brain fried joke 
Who tf's butthurt/melting here? Certainly not me. Wtf do I have to be butthurt about?
I made this thread to find out how Atwood increased the size of his pecs and to further prove that genetics in bodybuilding don't mean shit. I have always been a fan of his physique. I never criticized him or said steroids were how he brought up his pecs. It's all in your ugly head.
And why did you suddenly care about Atwood's pecs (or any other body parts of his for that matter)? All the bodybuilders who have improved their chests and you JUST SO HAPPEN to pick the guy that beat Ruhl one week after Ruhl's biggest win ever. SURE!!
BTW, Where is it that you declare that you know (or have a reasonable guess) as to how he got a bigger chest, other than his obviously getting bigger ALL OVER? Contrary to another ridiculous claim, Atwood was never "huge all over -- except his chest".
If you're such a fan of his physique, then looking up an article or two of his pec training shouldn't have been that difficult. You haven't even claimed that you have an idea of how he did it. Instead, you posted side-by-side pics of him where there's obviously a time lapse of several years (perhaps, up to a DECADE).
"You LOVE using contests to show how much your favorite, Markus Ruhl, just supposedly crushed everyone"
"All those pics you posted, comparing Ruhl with Dillett, with Coleman, etc. all came from CONTESTS"
- WOW - STILL going on about contests 
- And no. I don't "LOVE using contests to blah blah" Idgaf about contests (like you do), retard.
Yes, you do, chucklehead. Otherwise, you wouldn't be using CONTEST PICS, comparing Ruhl with other bodybuilders.
You didn't use individual pics of Ruhl and put them against individual pics of Coleman or Dillett or Cutler. Nor did you use gym footage of those guys. You compared them in CONTESTS against each other, head up. Yet, because Ruhl LOST to those guys, you pull the "get-off-my-lawn" grumpy goofball routine and claim the shows are all rigged (except the one Ruhl actually wins, of course) and that the judges are all gay.
"But, all it took was one shot to point out that Ruhl lost to a rookie (Atwood), and you melt like butter on a blowtorch"
I couldn't care less who placed first or last in some bs bb pageant you utter moron (for the 50th time).
All I said was Ruhl's physique at 2002 NOC is the GOAT.
Ruhl is the GOAT at a show where he WON!! But, at a show where he got BEAT a week later, he's not so GOATy?
Did Ruhl lose his GOATness in a week? Why aren't you singing the praises of Ruhl's appearance at the Toronto Pro? Surely such GOATness doesn't disappear in a mere 7 days.
Oh, it's those "homo" judges again, the same ones that gave him FIRST PLACE at NOC. Those must not be quite as gay as the Toronto ones.
If Art Atwood or some other bodybuilder placed higher than Ruhl did at some point in his career then COOL STORY BRO - IDGAF. It means NOTHING. Why do you think I care? Why are you obsessed with who won what, who defeated who in a bb pageant?
It does mean something to you, or you wouldn't be wailing about the "homos" who didn't place Ruhl higher in those pics where you claim he dominated the likes of Dillett or Coleman. You claimed Ruhl was Thanos. But, because "Thanos" got beat at those shows, you don't like the judges; so they're all gay.
You also claimed Ruhl dwarfed everyone. But, there was that pesky rookie pro in Toronto, after whom you made this thread.
You have serious issues
You are extremely stupid
Your brain is wired up incorrectly
You are delusional
You are pathetic
You are beneath me mentally and physically
You aren't worth my time (but I will keep replying and owning your fat ass so you don't think you won a contest)
You need help.
Don't they have things like Midol for your current condition?
