The 2024 General Election

[Dos Equis]

Michelle Obama tops Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton and Gavin Newsom as a replacement for Joe Biden, 81, if he drops out: New poll reveals who Democrats would want on the ticket and how likely they feel he WON'T run
Survey finds nearly half of voters believe Biden will be replaced on Dem ticket
Michelle Obama is top choice to replacement Biden, VP Harris comes in second
Speculation over Biden remaining on the ticket went into overdrive following the special counsel report
By SARAH EWALL-WICE, SENIOR U.S. POLITICAL REPORTER
PUBLISHED:  26 February 2024
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13128075/michelle-obama-tops-harris-clinton-newsom-biden-replacement.html?fbclid=IwAR3EB9bvJXvjihNHm7gXBbq23pnJxq6tljFDEkZFmI7K2PLscmQ1l2QgWTs

[Dos Equis]

Trump wins Michigan. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-primary-elections/michigan-president-results

[Coach is Back!]

More Than 100K Voters Chose ‘Uncommitted’ over Joe Biden in Michigan Democrat Primary


https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/02/28/nolte-more-than-100k-voters-chose-uncommitted-over-joe-biden-in-michigan-democrat-primary/

[Soul Crusher]

More Than 100K Voters Chose ‘Uncommitted’ over Joe Biden in Michigan Democrat Primary


https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/02/28/nolte-more-than-100k-voters-chose-uncommitted-over-joe-biden-in-michigan-democrat-primary/

gaza is the least of Bidens failures and disasters! 

[Moontrane]

More Than 100K Voters Chose ‘Uncommitted’ over Joe Biden in Michigan Democrat Primary

https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/02/28/nolte-more-than-100k-voters-chose-uncommitted-over-joe-biden-in-michigan-democrat-primary/

Michigan uncommitted Democratic voters:

2012 - 20,833
2016 - 21,601
2020 - 19,106
2024 - >100,000

https://theconversation.com/more-than-100k-michigan-voters-pick-uncommitted-over-biden-does-that-matter-for-november-224599

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2024/02/27/uncommitted-campaign-celebrates-democratic-primary-showing/72743731007/

[Primemuscle]

More Than 100K Voters Chose ‘Uncommitted’ over Joe Biden in Michigan Democrat Primary


https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/02/28/nolte-more-than-100k-voters-chose-uncommitted-over-joe-biden-in-michigan-democrat-primary/

Yes but, 296,225 voters chose Haley over Trump, plus 33,533 voters chose uncommitted over Trump, DeSantis (who is not running) got 13,430 votes, Christi got 4,792 votes, Rammy got 3,717, Binkley netted 2,348 votes, and Hutchinson (also not running) 1,089 votes. Meaning Trump lost a grand total of 355,134 votes.

Also worth noting is that Trump netted 68.1% of the Republican vote while Biden got 81.1% of the Democratic vote. Only two Michigan delegates will be "uncommitted" at the Democratic National convention.

[deadz]

Yes but, 296,225 voters chose Haley over Trump, plus 33,533 voters chose uncommitted over Trump, DeSantis (who is not running) got 13,430 votes, Christi got 4,792 votes, Rammy got 3,717, Binkley netted 2,348 votes, and Hutchinson (also not running) 1,089 votes. Meaning Trump lost a grand total of 355,134 votes. Yes but, 296,225 voters chose Haley over Trump, plus 33,533 voters chose uncommitted over Trump, DeSantis (who is not running) got 13,430 votes, Christi got 4,792 votes, Rammy got 3,717, Binkley netted 2,348 votes, and Hutchinson (also not running) 1,089 votes. Meaning Trump lost a grand total of 355,134 votes.

Also worth noting is that Trump netted 68.1% of the Republican vote while Biden got 81.1% of the Democratic vote. Only two Michigan delegates will be "uncommitted" at the Democratic National convention.

We all knew Michigan wasn't going to be a win. Demturd State!

[Moontrane]

Yes but, 296,225 voters chose Haley over Trump, plus 33,533 voters chose uncommitted over Trump, DeSantis (who is not running) got 13,430 votes, Christi got 4,792 votes, Rammy got 3,717, Binkley netted 2,348 votes, and Hutchinson (also not running) 1,089 votes. Meaning Trump lost a grand total of 355,134 votes. Yes but, 296,225 voters chose Haley over Trump, plus 33,533 voters chose uncommitted over Trump, DeSantis (who is not running) got 13,430 votes, Christi got 4,792 votes, Rammy got 3,717, Binkley netted 2,348 votes, and Hutchinson (also not running) 1,089 votes. Meaning Trump lost a grand total of 355,134 votes.

Also worth noting is that Trump netted 68.1% of the Republican vote while Biden got 81.1% of the Democratic vote. Only two Michigan delegates will be "uncommitted" at the Democratic National convention.

Heard you the first time.   

[Primemuscle]

Heard you the first time.   

Sorry. Picked up the habit of repeating the same statements over and over from Donald Trump. At least mine is the truth... better than repeating lies.

[illuminati]

Yes but, 296,225 voters chose Haley over Trump, plus 33,533 voters chose uncommitted over Trump, DeSantis (who is not running) got 13,430 votes, Christi got 4,792 votes, Rammy got 3,717, Binkley netted 2,348 votes, and Hutchinson (also not running) 1,089 votes. Meaning Trump lost a grand total of 355,134 votes. Yes but, 296,225 voters chose Haley over Trump, plus 33,533 voters chose uncommitted over Trump, DeSantis (who is not running) got 13,430 votes, Christi got 4,792 votes, Rammy got 3,717, Binkley netted 2,348 votes, and Hutchinson (also not running) 1,089 votes. Meaning Trump lost a grand total of 355,134 votes.

Also worth noting is that Trump netted 68.1% of the Republican vote while Biden got 81.1% of the Democratic vote. Only two Michigan delegates will be "uncommitted" at the Democratic National convention.

So 33,000 Republican's choose uncommitted over Trump
And over 3x as many Dummycraps 100,000+ choose uncommitted over
Pedo Joe ??

Is that correct Prime ? or have I mistakenly got that wrong as you
left that out of your analysis breakdown.

[chaos]

Yes but, 296,225 voters chose Haley over Trump, plus 33,533 voters chose uncommitted over Trump, DeSantis (who is not running) got 13,430 votes, Christi got 4,792 votes, Rammy got 3,717, Binkley netted 2,348 votes, and Hutchinson (also not running) 1,089 votes. Meaning Trump lost a grand total of 355,134 votes.

Also worth noting is that Trump netted 68.1% of the Republican vote while Biden got 81.1% of the Democratic vote. Only two Michigan delegates will be "uncommitted" at the Democratic National convention.

Is this some sort of weird old man rationalization/deflection thing here? None of this babbling that you copy/pasted minimizes what was posted about peoples feelings on Joe Bitem.

[Irongrip400]

More Than 100K Voters Chose ‘Uncommitted’ over Joe Biden in Michigan Democrat Primary


https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/02/28/nolte-more-than-100k-voters-chose-uncommitted-over-joe-biden-in-michigan-democrat-primary/

It doesn’t matter. They’ll vote for Biden in the general election. They’re just trying to prove a point.

[SOMEPARTS]

Heard a quip about this today but did not yet verify...supposedly the only person who can carry over Biden's election funds to run without issue is Harris.

[Primemuscle]

So 33,000 Republican's choose uncommitted over Trump
And over 3x as many Dummycraps 100,000+ choose uncommitted over
Pedo Joe ??

Is that correct Prime ? or have I mistakenly got that wrong as you
left that out of your analysis breakdown.

You are correct I left out the total number of uncommitted votes on the Democratic side which was 100,000+ voters or better said, 100,000+ who voted against Biden. While 355,134 voted against Trump on the Republican side.

Consider this, it is likely most of the 100,00+ uncommitted voters will vote for Biden in the General, whereas it is not likely those who voted for candidates other than Trump will vote for him in the general. If Haley is not on the ballot in the general, many of those 355,134 folks will vote for Biden and not for Trump.

Too confusing for you? Not to worry. I am not a statistician nor a psychic. As is frequently the case in presidential elections, the outcomes are unpredictable. Speculation is a fun but meaningless game that people play, including me. I will not be betting on the winner in this election because I do not gamble.


And just for Chaos who has trouble determining the intent of my posts. This one is a combination of facts (the numbers at the time of the article when about 90% of the count was in), speculation both mine and others, and my opinion. Chew on that, Chaos. 

[Moontrane]

It doesn’t matter. They’ll vote for Biden in the general election. They’re just trying to prove a point.

They won't vote for Trump, but some may sit out the election.

[Dos Equis]

They won't vote for Trump, but some may sit out the election.

Correct.  I think the biggest problem Biden will have (other than the fact he is mentally incompetent and physically frail) is voter apathy.  A lot of people are going to stay home this time around.

[Dos Equis]

PAR Poll: Trump Leads Biden in Maine, Would Flip State
By Theodore Bunker  | 28 February 2024
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/poll-donald-trump-maine/2024/02/28/id/1155285/

[illuminati]

You are correct I left out the total number of uncommitted votes on the Democratic side which was 100,000+ voters or better said, 100,000+ who voted against Biden. While 355,134 voted against Trump on the Republican side.

Consider this, it is likely most of the 100,00+ uncommitted voters will vote for Biden in the General, whereas it is not likely those who voted for candidates other than Trump will vote for him in the general. If Haley is not on the ballot in the general, many of those 355,134 folks will vote for Biden and not for Trump.

Too confusing for you? Not to worry. I am not a statistician nor a psychic. As is frequently the case in presidential elections, the outcomes are unpredictable. Speculation is a fun but meaningless game that people play, including me. I will not be betting on the winner in this election because I do not gamble.


And just for Chaos who has trouble determining the intent of my posts. This one is a combination of facts (the numbers at the time of the article when about 90% of the count was in), speculation both mine and others, and my opinion. Chew on that, Chaos. 

FFS a simple yes or no would've sufficed .

I didn't read beyond 'You are correct'  Thought I was  😊  👊🏻  👍🏻

[chaos]

Any body who claims Mr Trump is not clever should look at how consistently, effectively and patiently he used Mr McConnell (who in all probably thinks trump is coarse & stupid)


McConnell’s entire political life has been in pursuit of two aims: Placing conservative inFederal judicial positions and the perpetuation of the Republican party’s electoral power

Nothing else mattered  . Everything else— friends  foreign policy social, minimal government reach, economic gain That’s why McConnell backed  Trump and helped elect MAGA senators (most of whom despised him). He declined support Mr Trumps impeachment.

McConnell’s entire political life has been in pursuit of two aims: Placing conservative judges in Federal judicial positions and the perpetuation of the Republican party’s electoral power

Mr Trump understood this and has used McConnell so brilliantly that McConnell doesn't even know that he has been all the better as a Trump took than had he kissed the ring

Much better and more clever than Bidens use of Kuntmala to attempt to gain the votes of minorities and women, you think?

[Primemuscle]

FFS a simple yes or no would've sufficed .

I didn't read beyond 'You are correct'  Thought I was  😊  👊🏻  👍🏻

Don't like the response... don't read it. 'I really don't care do U?'

[illuminati]

Don't like the response... don't read it. 'I really don't care do U?'

I didn't  😊

Just the 'You are Correct' bit 👍🏻 😊

[Skeletor]

What was it the Democrats kept parroting "this is dangerous to our democracy"?


Rep. Jamie Raskin “working on” bill responding to Trump ballot ruling

A leading House Democrat is preparing legislation in response to the Supreme Court's ruling on Monday that Colorado could not disqualify former President Trump from its state ballot, Axios has learned.

"Congress will have to try and act,"  Raskin, a former member of the Jan. 6 select committee, said he is already crafting the bill, telling Axios, "I'm working on it — today."

Raskin pointed to legislation he introduced with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) in 2022 creating a pathway for the Justice Department to sue to keep candidates off the ballot under the 14th Amendment. "We are going to revise it in light of the Supreme Court's decision," Raskin said.

Raskin suggested the bill would be paired with a resolution declaring Jan. 6 an "insurrection" and that those involved "engaged in insurrection."

https://www.axios.com/2024/03/04/jamie-raskin-trump-ballot-ruling-supreme-court

[Soul Crusher]

They are communists through and through. 

What was it the Democrats kept parroting "this is dangerous to our democracy"?


Rep. Jamie Raskin “working on” bill responding to Trump ballot ruling

A leading House Democrat is preparing legislation in response to the Supreme Court's ruling on Monday that Colorado could not disqualify former President Trump from its state ballot, Axios has learned.

"Congress will have to try and act,"  Raskin, a former member of the Jan. 6 select committee, said he is already crafting the bill, telling Axios, "I'm working on it — today."

Raskin pointed to legislation he introduced with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) in 2022 creating a pathway for the Justice Department to sue to keep candidates off the ballot under the 14th Amendment. "We are going to revise it in light of the Supreme Court's decision," Raskin said.

Raskin suggested the bill would be paired with a resolution declaring Jan. 6 an "insurrection" and that those involved "engaged in insurrection."

https://www.axios.com/2024/03/04/jamie-raskin-trump-ballot-ruling-supreme-court

[Dos Equis]

What was it the Democrats kept parroting "this is dangerous to our democracy"?


Rep. Jamie Raskin “working on” bill responding to Trump ballot ruling

A leading House Democrat is preparing legislation in response to the Supreme Court's ruling on Monday that Colorado could not disqualify former President Trump from its state ballot, Axios has learned.

"Congress will have to try and act,"  Raskin, a former member of the Jan. 6 select committee, said he is already crafting the bill, telling Axios, "I'm working on it — today."

Raskin pointed to legislation he introduced with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) in 2022 creating a pathway for the Justice Department to sue to keep candidates off the ballot under the 14th Amendment. "We are going to revise it in light of the Supreme Court's decision," Raskin said.

Raskin suggested the bill would be paired with a resolution declaring Jan. 6 an "insurrection" and that those involved "engaged in insurrection."

https://www.axios.com/2024/03/04/jamie-raskin-trump-ballot-ruling-supreme-court

So they can just declare an event an insurrection and label someone an insurrectionist without a criminal charge, trial, and conviction.  These people are crazy.

[Dos Equis]

Trump wins caucuses in Missouri and Idaho and sweeps Michigan GOP convention
MARCH 3, 2024
By The Associated Press
https://www.npr.org/2024/03/03/1235588882/trump-wins-caucuses-in-missouri-and-idaho-and-sweeps-michigan-gop-convention