Author Topic: The 2024 General Election  (Read 249525 times)

SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16628
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1775 on: August 02, 2024, 11:59:41 AM »
No.  Is it good?


It is prophetic. Everyone in the country should be required to watch it before the election.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1776 on: August 02, 2024, 07:19:32 PM »

It is prophetic. Everyone in the country should be required to watch it before the election.

I'll check it out.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1777 on: August 02, 2024, 07:20:38 PM »
The anti-Democratic party strikes again.  Now time to try and drag this dud across the finish line without having speak off script. 

Democrats Hand Kamala Harris Presidential Nomination
Robert McGreevy
Reporter
August 02, 2024
https://dailycaller.com/2024/08/02/democrats-kamala-harris-presidential-nomination-dnc/

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41777
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1778 on: August 03, 2024, 12:12:20 AM »
The anti-Democratic party strikes again.  Now time to try and drag this dud across the finish line without having speak off script. 

Democrats Hand Kamala Harris Presidential Nomination
Robert McGreevy
Reporter
August 02, 2024
https://dailycaller.com/2024/08/02/democrats-kamala-harris-presidential-nomination-dnc/

They are hiding her from interviews and debates.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42406
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1779 on: August 03, 2024, 05:15:00 PM »
They are hiding her from interviews and debates.

What debate? Has there been one and VP Harris didn't show up. Jeez, I must have missed that one. ::) Time will tell who of these two is a debate no-show.

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32626
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1780 on: August 04, 2024, 12:17:17 AM »
They are hiding her from interviews and debates.
Trump wants her to debate him on FoxNews and she is refusing. She only wants to debate on ABC (the network that secretly gave Clinton the questions in 2016) and will never leave her home turf. He is smart for requesting this. She is the newcomer on the block and needs to prove herself worthy. Trump has gone to enemy territory over and over. The libs know she is destroyed in a debate if she doesn't get special treatment.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15499
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1781 on: August 04, 2024, 01:36:56 AM »
Trump wants her to debate him on FoxNews and she is refusing. She only wants to debate on ABC (the network that secretly gave Clinton the questions in 2016) and will never leave her home turf. He is smart for requesting this. She is the newcomer on the block and needs to prove herself worthy. Trump has gone to enemy territory over and over. The libs know she is destroyed in a debate if she doesn't get special treatment.

The Debate between Biden and Trump was originally on ABC. Your statement that ABC gave Hillary the questions is false. It was another party and ABC cut ties with them. I think Trump is using this as a ploy to avoid a debate. He was fine with debating Biden on ABC but suddenly he's not. Nothing's changed except the challenger. 

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24927
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1782 on: August 04, 2024, 03:45:24 AM »
The Debate between Biden and Trump was originally on ABC. Your statement that ABC gave Hillary the questions is false. It was another party and ABC cut ties with them. I think Trump is using this as a ploy to avoid a debate. He was fine with debating Biden on ABC but suddenly he's not. Nothing's changed except the challenger.

IIRC ABC put a lot conditions / restriction on Donald that all favoured
Pedo Joe & he still completely Fucked up.

So why would he want to go back on ABC.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24810
  • SC è un asino
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1783 on: August 04, 2024, 06:46:58 AM »
The Debate between Biden and Trump was originally on ABC. Your statement that ABC gave Hillary the questions is false. It was another party and ABC cut ties with them. I think Trump is using this as a ploy to avoid a debate. He was fine with debating Biden on ABC but suddenly he's not. Nothing's changed except the challenger.

He is not worried about debating Harris.

Say what you want but he is more accessible than anyone in the Biden admin has ever been.

Kamala hasn't even gotten an interview yet.  It's all beging carefully calculated.  Even liberals have pointed out that when she is asked hard questions or caught off guard, she does very poorly.
Y

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59477
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1784 on: August 04, 2024, 08:16:40 AM »
The Debate between Biden and Trump was originally on ABC. Your statement that ABC gave Hillary the questions is false. It was another party and ABC cut ties with them. I think Trump is using this as a ploy to avoid a debate. He was fine with debating Biden on ABC but suddenly he's not. Nothing's changed except the challenger.
I believe the article I posted explained that Trump doesn't want to do the ABC debate due to the lawsuit he has ongoing with them and that Stephanopolis(?) guy.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

mphgrove

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2744
  • Getbig!
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1785 on: August 04, 2024, 12:12:30 PM »
I believe the article I posted explained that Trump doesn't want to do the ABC debate due to the lawsuit he has ongoing with them and that Stephanopolis(?) guy.

Lawsuits/lawsuits/lawsuits it is all personal, none of it really is about the nation

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59477
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1786 on: August 04, 2024, 02:05:49 PM »
Lawsuits/lawsuits/lawsuits it is all personal, none of it really is about the nation
I suppose if the media was honest and non-bias, there would be less lawsuits. Good luck with that.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1787 on: August 05, 2024, 01:07:29 PM »
They are hiding her from interviews and debates.

And doing a very effective job.  After the way they hid Biden for years, they can do this in their sleep for the next three months.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1788 on: August 05, 2024, 03:26:11 PM »
Harris tops Trump for first time in Nate Silver’s election forecast
by Lauren Sforza - 08/05/24
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4811646-harris-trump-election-forecast-nate-silver/

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59477
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1789 on: August 05, 2024, 04:04:17 PM »
And doing a very effective job.  After the way they hid Biden for years, they can do this in their sleep for the next three months.
Not if she actually meets him for a debate on neutral ground. ;)
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1790 on: August 05, 2024, 04:24:33 PM »
Not if she actually meets him for a debate on neutral ground. ;)

I'll be surprised if that happens.   :-\

deadz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12980
  • Liberals..Dumbest People on the Planet! MAGA
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1791 on: August 05, 2024, 06:15:28 PM »
Harris tops Trump for first time in Nate Silver’s election forecast
by Lauren Sforza - 08/05/24
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4811646-harris-trump-election-forecast-nate-silver/
Sickening!
T

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1792 on: August 05, 2024, 07:52:49 PM »
Leading Report
@LeadingReport
BREAKING: CNBC’s Jim Cramer says, “If you care about your paycheck, you go with Trump.”

https://x.com/LeadingReport/status/1820523388198424720

SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16628
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1793 on: August 05, 2024, 08:00:21 PM »
Harris is just Obama but less articulate. Nobody knows where she came from or where she stands on anything. Instead of talking in circles and baffling with bullshit like Obama did, she just says stupid stuff and they hide her like Biden.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1794 on: August 05, 2024, 08:06:50 PM »
Harris is just Obama but less articulate. Nobody knows where she came from or where she stands on anything. Instead of talking in circles and baffling with bullshit like Obama did, she just says stupid stuff and they hide her like Biden.

I agree.  Less articulate and much dumber.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1795 on: August 05, 2024, 08:07:41 PM »
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
Elon Musk Reveals 7 Reasons Why He’s Voting for Donald Trump

1. @ElonMusk was astounded when Trump fist-pumped and shouted, “Fight!” shortly after getting shot in the face. “You can't feign bravery in a situation like that,” he said.
         
2. Musk seeks a leader “who is strong and courageous to represent the country.”

3. He wants someone tough to deal with world leaders who are pretty tough themselves. “Poor guy [Biden] has trouble climbing a flight of stairs, and the other one's first pumping after getting shot. This is no comparison.”

4. Musk wants “a secure border. We don't have a secure border.”

5. He wants someone who can deliver “safe and clean cities.”

6. Musk Thinks Trump is the better candidate to reduce spending. He’s concerned about this issue because “we're currently spending at a rate that is bankrupting the country.”

7. Musk aligns with Trump’s vision to cut bureaucratic bloat. He wants someone who will “reduce the size of government.”

Pretty convincing list, wouldn't you agree?

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1819530943847153931

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1796 on: August 05, 2024, 08:44:41 PM »
Smart, genuine, and normal.  She has that in common with her husband.  And it's something Biden, his wife, and Kamala Harris lack. 


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1797 on: August 06, 2024, 11:04:14 AM »
lol

Liberal actor and comedian Michael Rapaport mocked Shapiro for walking back support for Israel and still getting passed over for Walz.

"Yo Josh Shapiro UNJEWED himself publicly & still didn’t get picked," Rapaport wrote to caption a video criticizing the Pennsylvania governor.


VP Kamala Harris picking Gov. Tim Walz as running mate met with media scorn: 'Such a weird choice'
Washington Post columnist Megan McArdle reacted to the pick by saying Harris 'reliably makes bad political decisions'
By Brian Flood Fox News
Published August 6, 2024
https://www.foxnews.com/media/vp-kamala-harris-picking-gov-tim-walz-running-mate-media-scorn-weird-choice

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1798 on: August 06, 2024, 11:06:59 AM »
Pretty disturbing if true.  He abandoned his unit before they deployed to combat.  And let's see how many media outlets refer to him as a retired Command Sergeant Major instead of a retired Master Sergeant. 

Paid letter: The Truth About Tim Walz
Published November 02, 2018

Tim Walz has embellished and selectively omitted facts and circumstances of his military career for years.

We, retired Command Sergeants Major of the Minnesota National Guard, feel it is our duty and responsibility to bring forth the truth as we know it concerning his service record. So, we have put together a timeline of his service post 9/11. To the best of our knowledge, this information is completely true, having been verified by all those who served in positions with first hand knowledge of the facts and circumstances of his service and departure from the Minnesota National Guard. Many of the dates and time frames are from his official discharge document and the reduction order reducing him to Master Sergeant.

On September 18th, 2001 Tim Walz reenlisted in the Minnesota Army National Guard for six years.

In early 2003 he was selected to attend the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy. The non-resident course consists of two years of correspondence coursework, followed by a two-week resident phase at Fort Bliss, Texas. When a Senior Non-Commissioned Officer accepts enrollment in the course, they accept three stipulations. First, they will serve for two years after graduation from the academy, or promotion to Sergeant Major or Command Sergeant Major, whichever is later. Second, if they fail the course they may be separated from the military. Third, they will complete the course or be reduced to Master Sergeant without board action. Senior Non-Commissioned Officers initial and sign a Statement of Agreement and Certification upon enrollment. The State Command Sergeant Major or Army National Guard Command Sergeant Major counsels the soldier and certifies that the senior Non-Commissioned Officer understands their responsibilities. These stipulations are put in place because the academy is a college level school, the military invests a lot of taxpayer money in the student. The military needs to ensure they will get the return on investment that the taxpayers deserve.

In late summer of 2003, First Sergeant Walz deployed with the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion in support of Operation Enduring Freedom to Italy. The mission was to augment United States Air Force Europe Security Forces doing base security for six months. In no way were the units or Soldiers of the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion replacing any units or military forces so they could deploy to Iraq or Afghanistan.

After the units return to Minnesota in the spring of 2004, he was selected by high level Command Sergeants Major to serve in the position of the Command Sergeant Major of the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion.

On August 5th, 2004 he was photographed holding a sign at a protest outside a President Bush campaign rally in southern Minnesota.

On September 17th, 2004 he was conditionally promoted to Command Sergeant Major. The conditions had been outlined to him when he was counseled and he signed the Statement of Agreement and Certification. If the conditions are not met, the promotion is null and void, like it never happened.

In early 2005, a warning order was issued to the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion, which included the position he was serving in, to prepare to be mobilized for active duty for a deployment to Iraq.

On May 16th, 2005 he quit, leaving the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion and its Soldiers hanging; without its senior Non-Commissioned Officer, as the battalion prepared for war. His excuse to other leaders was that he needed to retire in order to run for congress. Which is false, according to a Department of Defense Directive, he could have run and requested permission from the Secretary of Defense before entering active duty; as many reservists have. If he had retired normally and respectfully, you would think he would have ensured his retirement documents were correctly filled out and signed, and that he would have ensured he was reduced to Master Sergeant for dropping out of the academy. Instead he waited for the paperwork to catch up to him. His official retirement document states, SOLDIER NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.

On September 10th, 2005 conditionally promoted Command Sergeant Major Walz was reduced to Master Sergeant. It took a while for the system to catch up to him as it was uncharted territory, literally no one quits in the position he was in, or drops out of the academy. Except him.

In November of 2005, while the battalion trained for war at Camp Shelby, Mississippi, it received an offer from retired Master Sergeant Walz. He offered to fund raise for the battalions bus trip home over Christmas that year.

The 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion was deployed for 22 months in 2006 - 2007. During this time, they were restricted by Army regulations and could not speak out against a candidate for office. In November 2006 he was elected to the House of Representatives. He claims to be the highest-ranking enlisted service member ever to serve in congress. Even though he was conditionally promoted to Command Sergeant Major less than eight months, quit before his obligations were met, and was reduced to Master Sergeant for retirement. Yes, he served at that rank, but was never qualified at that rank, and will receive retirement benefits at one rank below. You be the judge.

On November 1st, 2006, Tom Hagen, Iraq War Veteran, wrote a letter to the editor of the Winona Daily News. Here are a couple of sentences from the letter: But even more disturbing is the fact that Walz quickly retired after learning that his unit -southern Minnesota's 1-125 FA Battalion - would be sent to Iraq. For Tim Walz to abandon his fellow soldiers and quit when they needed experienced leadership most is disheartening.

Here is part of Tim Walzs response: After completing 20 years of service in 2001, I re-enlisted to serve our country for an additional four years following Sept. 11 and retired the year before my battalion was deployed to Iraq in order to run for Congress.

According to his official Report of Separation and Record of Service, he re-enlisted for six years on September 18th, 2001. However, in his response he says that he re-enlisted for four years, conveniently retiring a year before his battalion was deployed to Iraq. Even if he had re-enlisted for four years following Sept.11, his retirement date would have been September 18th, 2005. Why then did he "retire" on May 16th, 2005, before his supposed four-year enlistment was up? And he makes it sound like he "retired" a year before his battalion deployed to Iraq; when in reality he knew when he "retired" that the battalion would be deployed to Iraq.

The bottom line in all of this is gut wrenching and sad to explain. When the nation called, he quit. He failed to complete the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy. He failed to serve for two years following completion of the academy, which he dropped out of. He failed to serve two years after the conditional promotion to Command Sergeant Major. He failed to fulfill the full six years of the enlistment he signed on September 18th, 2001. He failed his country. He failed his state. He failed the Minnesota Army National Guard, the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion, and his fellow Soldiers. And he failed to lead by example. Shameful.

Thomas Behrends

Command Sergeant Major (Retired)

Paul Herr

Command Sergeant Major (Retired)

This is a paid endorsement letter to the editor.

https://www.wctrib.com/community/letters/the-truth-about-tim-walz

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42406
Re: The 2024 General Election
« Reply #1799 on: August 06, 2024, 01:51:55 PM »
Pretty disturbing if true.  He abandoned his unit before they deployed to combat.  And let's see how many media outlets refer to him as a retired Command Sergeant Major instead of a retired Master Sergeant. 

Paid letter: The Truth About Tim Walz
Published November 02, 2018

Tim Walz has embellished and selectively omitted facts and circumstances of his military career for years.

We, retired Command Sergeants Major of the Minnesota National Guard, feel it is our duty and responsibility to bring forth the truth as we know it concerning his service record. So, we have put together a timeline of his service post 9/11. To the best of our knowledge, this information is completely true, having been verified by all those who served in positions with first hand knowledge of the facts and circumstances of his service and departure from the Minnesota National Guard. Many of the dates and time frames are from his official discharge document and the reduction order reducing him to Master Sergeant.

On September 18th, 2001 Tim Walz reenlisted in the Minnesota Army National Guard for six years.

In early 2003 he was selected to attend the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy. The non-resident course consists of two years of correspondence coursework, followed by a two-week resident phase at Fort Bliss, Texas. When a Senior Non-Commissioned Officer accepts enrollment in the course, they accept three stipulations. First, they will serve for two years after graduation from the academy, or promotion to Sergeant Major or Command Sergeant Major, whichever is later. Second, if they fail the course they may be separated from the military. Third, they will complete the course or be reduced to Master Sergeant without board action. Senior Non-Commissioned Officers initial and sign a Statement of Agreement and Certification upon enrollment. The State Command Sergeant Major or Army National Guard Command Sergeant Major counsels the soldier and certifies that the senior Non-Commissioned Officer understands their responsibilities. These stipulations are put in place because the academy is a college level school, the military invests a lot of taxpayer money in the student. The military needs to ensure they will get the return on investment that the taxpayers deserve.

In late summer of 2003, First Sergeant Walz deployed with the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion in support of Operation Enduring Freedom to Italy. The mission was to augment United States Air Force Europe Security Forces doing base security for six months. In no way were the units or Soldiers of the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion replacing any units or military forces so they could deploy to Iraq or Afghanistan.

After the units return to Minnesota in the spring of 2004, he was selected by high level Command Sergeants Major to serve in the position of the Command Sergeant Major of the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion.

On August 5th, 2004 he was photographed holding a sign at a protest outside a President Bush campaign rally in southern Minnesota.

On September 17th, 2004 he was conditionally promoted to Command Sergeant Major. The conditions had been outlined to him when he was counseled and he signed the Statement of Agreement and Certification. If the conditions are not met, the promotion is null and void, like it never happened.

In early 2005, a warning order was issued to the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion, which included the position he was serving in, to prepare to be mobilized for active duty for a deployment to Iraq.

On May 16th, 2005 he quit, leaving the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion and its Soldiers hanging; without its senior Non-Commissioned Officer, as the battalion prepared for war. His excuse to other leaders was that he needed to retire in order to run for congress. Which is false, according to a Department of Defense Directive, he could have run and requested permission from the Secretary of Defense before entering active duty; as many reservists have. If he had retired normally and respectfully, you would think he would have ensured his retirement documents were correctly filled out and signed, and that he would have ensured he was reduced to Master Sergeant for dropping out of the academy. Instead he waited for the paperwork to catch up to him. His official retirement document states, SOLDIER NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.

On September 10th, 2005 conditionally promoted Command Sergeant Major Walz was reduced to Master Sergeant. It took a while for the system to catch up to him as it was uncharted territory, literally no one quits in the position he was in, or drops out of the academy. Except him.

In November of 2005, while the battalion trained for war at Camp Shelby, Mississippi, it received an offer from retired Master Sergeant Walz. He offered to fund raise for the battalions bus trip home over Christmas that year.

The 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion was deployed for 22 months in 2006 - 2007. During this time, they were restricted by Army regulations and could not speak out against a candidate for office. In November 2006 he was elected to the House of Representatives. He claims to be the highest-ranking enlisted service member ever to serve in congress. Even though he was conditionally promoted to Command Sergeant Major less than eight months, quit before his obligations were met, and was reduced to Master Sergeant for retirement. Yes, he served at that rank, but was never qualified at that rank, and will receive retirement benefits at one rank below. You be the judge.

On November 1st, 2006, Tom Hagen, Iraq War Veteran, wrote a letter to the editor of the Winona Daily News. Here are a couple of sentences from the letter: But even more disturbing is the fact that Walz quickly retired after learning that his unit -southern Minnesota's 1-125 FA Battalion - would be sent to Iraq. For Tim Walz to abandon his fellow soldiers and quit when they needed experienced leadership most is disheartening.

Here is part of Tim Walzs response: After completing 20 years of service in 2001, I re-enlisted to serve our country for an additional four years following Sept. 11 and retired the year before my battalion was deployed to Iraq in order to run for Congress.

According to his official Report of Separation and Record of Service, he re-enlisted for six years on September 18th, 2001. However, in his response he says that he re-enlisted for four years, conveniently retiring a year before his battalion was deployed to Iraq. Even if he had re-enlisted for four years following Sept.11, his retirement date would have been September 18th, 2005. Why then did he "retire" on May 16th, 2005, before his supposed four-year enlistment was up? And he makes it sound like he "retired" a year before his battalion deployed to Iraq; when in reality he knew when he "retired" that the battalion would be deployed to Iraq.

The bottom line in all of this is gut wrenching and sad to explain. When the nation called, he quit. He failed to complete the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy. He failed to serve for two years following completion of the academy, which he dropped out of. He failed to serve two years after the conditional promotion to Command Sergeant Major. He failed to fulfill the full six years of the enlistment he signed on September 18th, 2001. He failed his country. He failed his state. He failed the Minnesota Army National Guard, the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion, and his fellow Soldiers. And he failed to lead by example. Shameful.

Thomas Behrends

Command Sergeant Major (Retired)

Paul Herr

Command Sergeant Major (Retired)

This is a paid endorsement letter to the editor.

https://www.wctrib.com/community/letters/the-truth-about-tim-walz

Wow! Did you have this post ready, and waiting should VP Kamala choose Tim Walz? How did you manage to find something so obscure?

The West Central Tribune's circulation of more than 16,000 papers is distributed throughout many surrounding communities. It is located in the little burg of Wilmar, MN which has a population of around 20,000 and it is located 2 hours from Minneapolis.

These two fellows paid the West Central Tribune to publish this letter to the editor in November 2018 when Governor Walz was first elected Governor of Minnesota. Despite their letter to the editor, he was reelected in 2022. Letters to the editor are generally checked for factual accuracy, and evidence-based criticism. I assume this one was, but there is no way to know this for sure.