I am bothered, but not surprised, by the fact you read one paid editorial from an obscure source and written by two fellows who seem to have an axe to grind, and you run with it. Now that more news stories have been released about the circumstances of Walz retirement after serving 24 years in the National Guard, you might want to read them as well, or not because you already got what you wanted which is a reason to take issue with Walz being picked VP Harris' running mate. Hmm, you should probably stick with Vance's opinions since his persona and politics are more consistent with yours.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/walzs-military-record-vances-accusations-stolen-valor/story?id=112618991
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/06/tim-walz-military-career-national-guard/74685414007/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tim-walz-military-record/
i=rwwcqN2BIvEfnKk5
Fact: He has repeatedly lied about his rank. He is not a retired Command Sergeant Major. He is a retired Master Sergeant. Big difference.
Fact: He reenlisted to serve until 2007.
Fact: He got a WARNO (Warning Order) in 2004, telling him his unit would deploy to combat in Iraq in 2005.
Fact: He retired early in 2005 to avoid going to Iraq, despite being the senior enlisted man in his unit, abandoning his Soldiers, at least one of who was killed in Iraq.
Fact: He has repeatedly lied about retiring to run for public office, when the real reason he retired was to avoid going to war.
You don't care about these facts because you are too much of a partisan to consider anything that conflicts with your political world view. You will stay in your bubble because it is safe in there. I don't fault you for doing so. Everyone has the right to live their life as they choose.
But Walz is a stolen valor lying dirtbag who should never be anywhere near a position that could allow him to be the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.