I mean musk's argument is retarded, some peoples misinformation is others information, then both terms are actually meaningless if that is the case, which is the fucking point. There are agreed upon facts that are information, then you go down the chain of certainty and probability as those turn into correlations etc.. if you think its a subjective free for all then that is clearly the problem. The arbitor is the strength of the facts presented, not the person presenting the information. The problem lately is post-truth, people put spins on things and that is the problem.