AOC’s Campaign Keeps Paying Foreign Agent

[Grape Ape]

I take it that you don't much care for AOC. Are you one of her constituents? If not, she likely does not give a rip what you think about her. Just saying...

Not sure I understand the point of this.  Are we only allowed to discuss politicians who are in our district, or that we know personally?

Wait, you said you have seen many, many videos of her. Does this mean rather than being a constituent you are a stalker.

No, it means she is a popular figure, I have twitter, listen to podcasts, and read realclearpolitics.  She's been in office for years and in the news.  Again, what's the point of comments like this?

If Ben Shapiro asked me to sit down for a 'civil conversation' in the midst of my campaigning for office, I would be suspicious of his intentions.

Whether you like his politics or not, Shapiro is always polite to his guests. It's his M.O.  He said he would give her a platform to voice her positions on things.  Of course, if she could not articulate those positions when questioned, she'd get exposed.

In August 2018 when AOC was campaigning for the office to which she got elected, Shapiro said during a segment on “The Ben Shapiro Show” that he would donate $10,000 to Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign if she agreed to debate him. She tweeted “Just like catcalling, I don’t owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Thursday night. “And also, like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one.” This seems to me like a rather clever play on words on her part... especially for someone who some people call a dunce. Catcalling and egging someone on is pretty close to the same thing.

To which Shapiro replied in a tweet, "Discussion and debate are not “bad intentions.” Slandering someone as a sexist catcaller without reason or evidence does demonstrate cowardice and bad intent, however."

She made a wise decision to run the other way. He tried to set her up and failed. Simple as that. It's not like it would have helped her get elected... probably the opposite.

It would have exposed her because she's not smart enough to have that discussion.  Her handlers knew this, and wisely declined.  She'll never do it now that she's established, because she still could not handle it.

[Agnostic007]

You're deliberately being obtuse / playing semantics 
You know full well the Hunter laptop lies used by Pedo pete to say Russia & Donald
There's you being hypercritical .

This post is just once again calling me something bad while not providing the post I allegedly committed the offense in.. It would be the same as me calling you a a degenerate drunk, then when you say "what are you talking about??" I reply with

"You're deliberately being obtuse, playing semantics. You know full well there are plenty of bars and pubs in your area

There's you being a degenerate drunk again...

[illuminati]

This post is just once again calling me something bad while not providing the post I allegedly committed the offense in.. It would be the same as me calling you a a degenerate drunk, then when you say "what are you talking about??" I reply with

"You're deliberately being obtuse, playing semantics. You know full well there are plenty of bars and pubs in your area

There's you being a degenerate drunk again...

If you think so.

Carry on.

[Agnostic007]

If you think so.

Carry on.

will do

[LurkerNoMore]

This post is just once again calling me something bad while not providing the post I allegedly committed the offense in.. It would be the same as me calling you a a degenerate drunk, then when you say "what are you talking about??" I reply with

"You're deliberately being obtuse, playing semantics. You know full well there are plenty of bars and pubs in your area

There's you being a degenerate drunk again...

You can't expect anything of substance or common sense from someone spree posting in the middle of the night.

[chaos]

NY post - hunters laptop / Russian collusion/ 50+ signatories/ Joe lying & denying it was true
While knowing full well it was very true. Complete scumbag Khvnt.

That should help jog your memory a wee bit.

You're wasting your time, he's far too gone into the democrat hole. He's fallen into lurker/straw territory.

[illuminati]

You're wasting your time, he's far too gone into the democrat hole. He's fallen into lurker/straw territory.

I'm starting to think you're right - I've always had Time & respect for what AG posted.
This last episode has me a little Hmmm   as he clearly knows waht he's implied
& what I'm referring to yet just wants to be Childish.

He still has some way to go to get to the depths of lurking for Boys.
Probably AIDS has affected what few brain cells it had in the 1st place.
& in !....2........ 3.............. Pavlov's dog will respond    I've got it Trained so well 

Still it's Getbig & AG can say /do as he wants, 

[LurkerNoMore]

You're wasting your time, he's far too gone into the democrat hole. He's fallen into lurker/straw territory.

You mean the territory where facts, evidence and common sense resides?

I can see why you are a stranger.

But it’s cute.   A poster who is nothing more than background fodder with no real opinion of his own  agreeing with a foreign c unt poster that is a proven liar many times over.   And neither can refute anything in the posts that trigger them.

[chaos]

You mean the territory where facts, evidence and common sense resides?

I can see why you are a stranger.

But it’s cute.   A poster who is nothing more than background fodder with no real opinion of his own  agreeing with a foreign c unt poster that is a proven liar many times over.   And neither can refute anything in the posts that trigger them.

Coming from a guy that spends his days regurgitating every anti-Trump article msm posts.

[LurkerNoMore]

Coming from a guy that spends his days regurgitating every anti-Trump article msm posts.

Facts are anti-Trump?  Interesting.  And true.  But then again, that is just how reality is.

Also true is how each little fact about Trumpy triggers your TDfS into epic levels.   "          "

[The Gov]

Facts are anti-Trump?  Interesting.  And true.  But then again, that is just how reality is.

Also true is how each little fact about Trumpy triggers your TDfS into epic levels.   "          "

[Primemuscle]

Not sure I understand the point of this.  Are we only allowed to discuss politicians who are in our district, or that we know personally?[\quote]

You are allowed to discuss any politician you choose. It would be nice though if people focused on what the politicians do as our representatives. For example, their congressional voting record. When someone personally knows the politician, they are discussing, it may offer better insight as to who they are as people as well as their political views. Over many years, I have met many, mostly state politicians at both informal and campaign events, many are very different from the image they present to the general public, and rightly so since they are just regular people like you or me.

No, it means she is a popular figure, I have twitter, listen to podcasts, and read realclearpolitics.  She's been in office for years and in the news.  Again, what's the point of comments like this?[\quote]

I was kidding you about stalking AOC. She took office in 2019 maybe five years is a lot  to you but to me she is still a freshman… hardly what I think of as a seasoned politician.

Whether you like his politics or not, Shapiro is always polite to his guests. It's his M.O.  He said he would give her a platform to voice her positions on things.  Of course, if she could not articulate those positions when questioned, she'd get exposed.

I don’t tune in to Shapiro’s podcasts, so it is nice to read he is polite to his guests. Nevertheless, he challenged her to a debate. Debates are often contentious. IMO it was a wise decision for her to not debate him at that point in time. 

It would have exposed her because she's not smart enough to have that discussion.  Her handlers knew this, and wisely declined.  She'll never do it now that she's established, because she still could not handle it.

It would have exposed her idealism and lack of actual experience as a House Rep. She was smart enough to know better than to agree to that debate. I would have done the same if I were in her position.

Handlers seems like an odd term to describe advisors. She’s not a boxer or a racehorse despite her oversized teeth. Seems like her declining response on Twitter came directly from her and not someone advising her. Gues you’d have to have been there when the response was posted to be sure whose it was.

It is your opinion that she still could not handle it. Maybe debating Shapiro is not important enough for the future of her political career. She seems to have done just fine thus far sans a Shapiro debate.

Wise politicians cater to the audience that will get them elected. Shapiro’s audience will never be hers. Anyway, she clearly did not need their votes.