Check this out:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan^ IMO, that is evidence that Hitler's policy on Jews was initially one of emigration, not extermination. He did allude to a Holocaust if Germany was dragged into another war, by what he deemed Jewish influence in the press and in international finance.
Which makes me wonder - why antagonize someone who promised that, who had the means to carry it out?
Makes me think elite Jews either wanted to Holocaust [for sympathy for a Jewish homeland, or to cull their lower IQ members, given how selective Jews are as to who becomes a Jew or not], or didn't take Hitler seriously.
I'm not sure which.
But Hitler would have never planned to relocate Jews to Madagascar if he had a plan of Jewish extermination from the start.
Maybe it was just a matter of not thinking Whites/Gentiles ever push back, and losing control of the situation.
You'd think if a world leader as powerful as Hitler was threatens a Holocaust, you would take him seriously.
This is a good article, written by a Jewish scholar:
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html^ Jews have not committed crimes against humanity to that extent since Hitler. So he clearly factors in the Jewish collective consciousness at some level.
What I can't stand is the one-sided nature of this topic.
I agree that Jews were scapegoated - but common Jews were scapegoated for the actions of elite Jews...like Lazar Kaganovich, who perpetrated the Ukrainian Famine [Holodolor].
To make it sound like everything outlined in that YNetNews article didn't happen...that's ridiculous.
Although normal Jews being killed over what Kaganovich or the Rothschilds did isn't fair. But we have this conversation like none of that happened.