Author Topic: Pam Anderson (2023)  (Read 5705 times)

SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16628
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #25 on: October 02, 2023, 11:01:09 AM »
Red heads....they all turn into Bonnie Rait around 35. SAD!

michael arvilla

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21925
  • facebook.com/michael.arvilla
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #26 on: October 02, 2023, 11:09:47 AM »
It's actually shocking to Me to see these.... so I guess that's it more than anything else....

Rmj11

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1865
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #27 on: October 02, 2023, 11:26:46 AM »
It's actually shocking to Me to see these.... so I guess that's it more than anything else....

Whose that guy? 😆

residue

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4781
  • Adonis 3:16
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #28 on: October 02, 2023, 11:27:33 AM »
The point?  I'm fascinated that one of the most desirable/ lusted after sex symbols in all of history looks like this! .... and has the guts to be photographed sans makeup! Everyone gets old sure ..... but celebrities hide it ..... she's embracing it .... do I think she looks " beautiful?" Hell no! .... she looks like what she is  ... a clapped out promiscuous Hep-C former sex symbol ....it's crazy for me to remember how hot I thought she was (bought the Playboy with her on the cover) .... to how every man / boy / whatever was in love with her .... to now looking like this! So no " point" just my own fascination and what I thought my Get-Big brethren might want to see!!


i never got that hype, all of these girls had asses flatter than pancakes.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71284
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #29 on: October 02, 2023, 11:31:33 AM »
Red heads....they all turn into Bonnie Rait around 35. SAD!
.....but they can`t play slide guitar.  :(

Flexacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8403
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #30 on: October 02, 2023, 07:54:35 PM »
I'd still let her give me a hand/blow/rim job and happily cum all over her fake tits

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 52080
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #31 on: October 03, 2023, 01:51:29 AM »
DRAMATIC BENITO



Q

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #32 on: October 03, 2023, 02:17:04 AM »
That’s without makeup on though.

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #33 on: October 03, 2023, 02:33:37 AM »
She can find a man to have sex with in the next hour. If she wants, she can find men to support her for the rest of her life. No wall.

The Wall may refer to a relative decline in availability of men. In Pamela's case, her options are - in practical terms - unlimited, so she may be an exception, but she still has far fewer options than before.

Fortress has had a penchant for the former supermodel Paulina Porizkov since ~1989  ;D and she has claimed on record that the quantity and quality of dick she has access to has declined sharply since turning 40 - so I still think "The Wall", relative to previous options, is real. It just doesn't make as much difference when your access is essentially unlimited.

But Paulina did openly complain about it.

https://instagram.com/paulinaporizkov

As for Pamela...she was married to high-powered Hollywood producer Jon Peters for 12 days in 2020. She got him to pay off her debts, then called it a divorce. So you are correct that she still has such options.

Although a friend of mine once said [in response to V. Stiviano screwing over Jewish former NBA mogul Donald Sterling in 2014] that stuff like that will reduce her future options - no matter how good she bobs.  ;D

"“There’s no fool like an old fool,” Peters, 74, tells the New York Post."

https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/celebrity/im-an-old-fool-for-marrying-pamela-anderson-says-hollywood-producer-jon-peters

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #34 on: October 03, 2023, 02:42:10 AM »
It's actually shocking to Me to see these.... so I guess that's it more than anything else....


Is that photo altered...or is she a burn victim?  ???

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #35 on: October 03, 2023, 02:46:04 AM »
DRAMATIC BENITO




LOL.

Remind me to NEVER hit that jaw pose again!  ;D

beakdoctor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7836
  • Royalty looks like a colostomy bag.
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #36 on: October 03, 2023, 05:43:28 AM »
Age hits the face and neck hard first. And especially in women. I admire people who are OK with getting older.

Dalnet

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1668
  • Getbig!
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #37 on: October 03, 2023, 05:45:44 AM »

As for Pamela...she was married to high-powered Hollywood producer Jon Peters for 12 days in 2020. She got him to pay off her debts, then called it a divorce. So you are correct that she still has such options.


"“There’s no fool like an old fool,” Peters, 74, tells the New York Post."

https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/celebrity/im-an-old-fool-for-marrying-pamela-anderson-says-hollywood-producer-jon-peters

I can totally believe she did that. After all these years of fame and opportunities at the pinnacle of Hollywood industry and she was 200k in debt? He even bought her a new wardrobe of attire because she was lacking it... watch because she'll fall into debt again in no time and the next sucker will be difficult to find because of this move. I have sympathy for the guy, in a sense, but he'll be OK. Seems like his empire is secure. She didn't even have 200k to her name. Pathetic

residue

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4781
  • Adonis 3:16
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #38 on: October 03, 2023, 06:32:40 AM »
Is that photo altered...or is she a burn victim?  ???


people with blue eyes arent meant to be in the sun

BBSSchlemiel

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2975
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #39 on: October 03, 2023, 08:20:54 AM »
The Wall may refer to a relative decline in availability of men. In Pamela's case, her options are - in practical terms - unlimited, so she may be an exception, but she still has far fewer options than before.

Fortress has had a penchant for the former supermodel Paulina Porizkov since ~1989  ;D and she has claimed on record that the quantity and quality of dick she has access to has declined sharply since turning 40 - so I still think "The Wall", relative to previous options, is real. It just doesn't make as much difference when your access is essentially unlimited.

But Paulina did openly complain about it.

https://instagram.com/paulinaporizkov

As for Pamela...she was married to high-powered Hollywood producer Jon Peters for 12 days in 2020. She got him to pay off her debts, then called it a divorce. So you are correct that she still has such options.

Although a friend of mine once said [in response to V. Stiviano screwing over Jewish former NBA mogul Donald Sterling in 2014] that stuff like that will reduce her future options - no matter how good she bobs.  ;D

"“There’s no fool like an old fool,” Peters, 74, tells the New York Post."

https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/celebrity/im-an-old-fool-for-marrying-pamela-anderson-says-hollywood-producer-jon-peters

That’s correct. However, as said, these women have more options than average men.

So yes, there is some “wall,” but I believe many men use the term to express comeuppance and vicarious revenge on women they never stood a chance with.

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39106
  • Do or do not. There is no try.
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #40 on: October 03, 2023, 08:57:39 AM »
Pam Anderson never looked like Pam Anderson without makeup.

michael arvilla

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21925
  • facebook.com/michael.arvilla

Fortress

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20748
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #42 on: October 03, 2023, 10:45:56 AM »
In her youth she had one of the nicest vaginas Fortress has ever seen.

But fact is, she was a very pretty girl who went into smouldering territory with face paint and the hairdos.

Her life has been degenerate men and flash.

Now she looks run-through and trashed.

Must suck.

I’ve always been ugly, so aging doesn’t bother me.

Hahahahahahahahahaha

Rmj11

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1865
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #43 on: October 03, 2023, 11:27:08 AM »
That’s correct. However, as said, these women have more options than average men.

So yes, there is some “wall,” but I believe many men use the term to express comeuppance and vicarious revenge on women they never stood a chance with.

Nope. She's hit the wall hard. The only guy she could get was an aging Hollywood producer. No Men would want her in her decline.

BBSSchlemiel

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2975
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #44 on: October 03, 2023, 12:22:42 PM »
Nope. She's hit the wall hard. The only guy she could get was an aging Hollywood producer. No Men would want her in her decline.

Really, no men? Alright. Are you aware of the amount of womanless men in the US?

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 35122
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #45 on: October 03, 2023, 01:06:59 PM »
she looks like an old dishcloth

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39106
  • Do or do not. There is no try.
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #46 on: October 03, 2023, 02:01:03 PM »
Jon Peters paid $200k+ to bang Pam.

tacobender

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2244
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #47 on: October 03, 2023, 02:11:51 PM »
she looks like an old dishcloth
no she looks more like the napkin I used to wipe my mouth

Goliathon

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 799
  • Here comes the boom!!
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #48 on: October 03, 2023, 02:22:22 PM »
The point?  I'm fascinated that one of the most desirable/ lusted after sex symbols in all of history
A chick is super hot for 3-5 years tops, after that it's pounds of makeup/plastic surgery and favorable camera angles.

Women are hot when they are young. All these guys who think 27 year old's are peak hot are delusional, without makeup it's impossible to be a 10 or even a solid 9 past 25.


looks like this! .... and has the guts to be photographed sans makeup! Everyone gets old sure ..... but celebrities hide it ..... she's embracing it .... do I think she looks " beautiful?" Hell no! .... she looks like what she is  ... a clapped out promiscuous Hep-C former sex symbol ....it's crazy for me to remember how hot I thought she was (bought the Playboy with her on the cover) .... to how every man / boy / whatever was in love with her .... to now looking like this! So no " point" just my own fascination and what I thought my Get-Big brethren might want to see!!

She's mentally defective for even being vaguely attracted to Tommy Lee.

Being mentally defective isn't hot.

Women are hot when they are young, because they are fertile.

Fertile has no value if you don't impregnante.

Women aren't suppose to be hot for long, if they were it'd imply they are incapable of attracting a husband, they're suppose to attract a husband and then become a mother.

Our societies is obsessed with an infertility cult, where women do everything they can to look as young and as fertile as possible, while paradoxically making themselves infertile in the process.







michael arvilla

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21925
  • facebook.com/michael.arvilla
Re: Pam Anderson (2023)
« Reply #49 on: October 03, 2023, 02:23:57 PM »
..... .....Matt's  face is haunting me need to get it out of my mind!