Trump investigator finds no fraud

[Agnostic007]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/expert-chosen-by-trump-to-investigate-voter-fraud-allegations-says-he-proved-every-one-of-them-false/ar-AA1lHQuv?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=3d8f74a86936467b85e8b3c7c51433a8&ei=21

“You were hired by team Trump to investigate voter fraud,” she said. “So, what was the bottom line from everything you looked at, Ken? Did you find the widespread fraud they wanted you to find?”

“No,” he replied. “In my job looking for voter fraud for the campaign, we didn’t find any– we didn’t find enough fraud to have impacted the result of any election in any of the swing states that we took a look at.”
Block said the campaign asked him to look into various voter fraud claims others were making.

“My team looked at approximately 15 or so claims – every one of which we were able to prove was false,” he said.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/2nd-firm-hired-trump-campaign-voter-fraud-claims/story?id=98934100

"There were just crazy claims of fraud coming in from the most unlikely places, and some from very likely places that I was asked to evaluate carefully and was able to document and prove that every one of them was false," Block said, noting he completed his work in early December.


Coach, a firm hired by trump and paid close to a million dollars. Can we at least put this stolen election bigfoot nonsense to rest and move on?

I'm guessing based on your IQ, that's a big no

[LurkerNoMore]

But the judge wouldn't look at the evidence!!!!!!!   [/whining and crying]

[chaos]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/expert-chosen-by-trump-to-investigate-voter-fraud-allegations-says-he-proved-every-one-of-them-false/ar-AA1lHQuv?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=3d8f74a86936467b85e8b3c7c51433a8&ei=21

“You were hired by team Trump to investigate voter fraud,” she said. “So, what was the bottom line from everything you looked at, Ken? Did you find the widespread fraud they wanted you to find?”

“No,” he replied. “In my job looking for voter fraud for the campaign, we didn’t find any– we didn’t find enough fraud to have impacted the result of any election in any of the swing states that we took a look at.”
Block said the campaign asked him to look into various voter fraud claims others were making.

“My team looked at approximately 15 or so claims – every one of which we were able to prove was false,” he said.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/2nd-firm-hired-trump-campaign-voter-fraud-claims/story?id=98934100

"There were just crazy claims of fraud coming in from the most unlikely places, and some from very likely places that I was asked to evaluate carefully and was able to document and prove that every one of them was false," Block said, noting he completed his work in early December.


Coach, a firm hired by trump and paid close to a million dollars. Can we at least put this stolen election bigfoot nonsense to rest and move on?

I'm guessing based on your IQ, that's a big no

Which is it
Thank democrats for keeping Trump popular!!

[LurkerNoMore]

Another blow to the tangerine toddler.

[deadz]

Trump laughs at you peasants. He has a plan for you anti-American rejects.

[LurkerNoMore]

Still no fraud.

[Coach is Back!]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/expert-chosen-by-trump-to-investigate-voter-fraud-allegations-says-he-proved-every-one-of-them-false/ar-AA1lHQuv?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=3d8f74a86936467b85e8b3c7c51433a8&ei=21

“You were hired by team Trump to investigate voter fraud,” she said. “So, what was the bottom line from everything you looked at, Ken? Did you find the widespread fraud they wanted you to find?”

“No,” he replied. “In my job looking for voter fraud for the campaign, we didn’t find any– we didn’t find enough fraud to have impacted the result of any election in any of the swing states that we took a look at.”
Block said the campaign asked him to look into various voter fraud claims others were making.

“My team looked at approximately 15 or so claims – every one of which we were able to prove was false,” he said.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/2nd-firm-hired-trump-campaign-voter-fraud-claims/story?id=98934100

"There were just crazy claims of fraud coming in from the most unlikely places, and some from very likely places that I was asked to evaluate carefully and was able to document and prove that every one of them was false," Block said, noting he completed his work in early December.


Coach, a firm hired by trump and paid close to a million dollars. Can we at least put this stolen election bigfoot nonsense to rest and move on?

I'm guessing based on your IQ, that's a big no

K, 1. There’s still mountains of evidence which is why after 3 years it’s still in being litigated.

2. Voter fraud and election interference are vastly different. If you don’t understand what “election interference” which has been blatantly thrown in our faces since at least 2018 and has now gone almost full communist, then you’re either blind, don’t understand it or dense.

[LurkerNoMore]

K, 1. There’s still mountains of evidence which is why after 3 years it’s still in being litigated.

2. Voter fraud and election interference are vastly different. If you don’t understand what “election interference” which has been blatantly thrown in our faces since at least 2018 and has now gone almost full communist, then you’re either blind, don’t understand it or dense.

1- Please show where the 2020 election is still being litigated.   
2- Does the voter fraud and election interference refer to the actions of MAGAtards trying to steal the election and then interfering with the transfer of power and the will of the voters?

How long will we have to wait to see your answers to these two questions?

[Primemuscle]

K, 1. There’s still mountains of evidence which is why after 3 years it’s still in being litigated.

2. Voter fraud and election interference are vastly different. If you don’t understand what “election interference” which has been blatantly thrown in our faces since at least 2018 and has now gone almost full communist, then you’re either blind, don’t understand it or dense.

Aside from the election interference or election subversion indictments against Trump and his cohorts, what aspects of election interference or voter fraud do you believe are still being litigated in December 2023 and where, (which states and/or jurisdictions). Would you agree that there is and has been voter suppression in this country?

Voter fraud and election interference may be different or the same, depending on how you define it. Voter fraud falls under the auspices of election interference. It can also be defined as election interference like what happen with Russia in the 2016 U.S. election.

'Electoral fraud, sometimes referred to as election manipulation, voter fraud, or vote rigging, involves illegal interference with the process of an election,[/b] either by increasing the vote share of a favored candidate, depressing the vote share of rival candidates, or both. It differs from but often goes together with voter suppression. What exactly constitutes electoral fraud varies from country to country, though the goal is often election subversion.' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud

Did you know that there are still 12 Russian military intelligence officers on the FBI's most wanted list? The People's Republic of China (Communist China) is also accused to interfering in U.S. elections. In varying degrees, the communist regimes of China, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam, and Cuba have and likely will continue to interfere with U.S. elections. So have other non-communist countries, such as Russia. Although this National Intelligence Council unclassified document dates to March 2021, it is an interesting read with regards to foreign threats to the 2020 US Federal elections.   

[LurkerNoMore]

1- Please show where the 2020 election is still being litigated.   
2- Does the voter fraud and election interference refer to the actions of MAGAtards trying to steal the election and then interfering with the transfer of power and the will of the voters?

How long will we have to wait to see your answers to these two questions?

Aside from the election interference or election subversion indictments against Trump and his cohorts, what aspects of election interference or voter fraud do you believe are still being litigated in December 2023 and where, (which states and/or jurisdictions). Would you agree that there is and has been voter suppression in this country?

Voter fraud and election interference may be different or the same, depending on how you define it. Voter fraud falls under the auspices of election interference. It can also be defined as election interference like what happen with Russia in the 2016 U.S. election.

'Electoral fraud, sometimes referred to as election manipulation, voter fraud, or vote rigging, involves illegal interference with the process of an election,[/b] either by increasing the vote share of a favored candidate, depressing the vote share of rival candidates, or both. It differs from but often goes together with voter suppression. What exactly constitutes electoral fraud varies from country to country, though the goal is often election subversion.' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud

Did you know that there are still 12 Russian military intelligence officers on the FBI's most wanted list? The People's Republic of China (Communist China) is also accused to interfering in U.S. elections. In varying degrees, the communist regimes of China, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam, and Cuba have and likely will continue to interfere with U.S. elections. So have other non-communist countries, such as Russia. Although this National Intelligence Council unclassified document dates to March 2021, it is an interesting read with regards to foreign threats to the 2020 US Federal elections.   

Just quoting so that anyone not just the incel that made these claims, can take a stab at answering if they want to.   

[Primemuscle]

Just quoting so that anyone not just the incel that made these claims, can take a stab at answering if they want to.   

As usual, our responses to Coach are similar only yours is much more succinct.

[LurkerNoMore]

As usual, our responses to Coach are similar only yours is much more succinct.

He will ignore both or post some empty non answer.

To the surprise of no one.

[Primemuscle]

He will ignore both or post some empty non answer.

To the surprise of no one.

If only we could see ourselves as others see us, including Coach. I fear for him, he has gradually become, IMO, way too serious about politics. The political climate is always in a state of change. Sometimes it is good and other times not so much. At least this has been my life experience.

[Dos Equis]

“No,” he replied. “In my job looking for voter fraud for the campaign, we didn’t find any– we didn’t find enough fraud to have impacted the result of any election in any of the swing states that we took a look at.”
Block said the campaign asked him to look into various voter fraud claims others were making.

So they found fraud, but not enough to impact an election, and this somehow proves there was no fraud?  Liberal logic.

[Primemuscle]

So they found fraud, but not enough to impact an election, and this somehow proves there was no fraud?  Liberal logic.

I doubt he meant what he said. If so, he not too bright since those two statements are for sure conflicting and illogical. I do not doubt there is some fraud, but not enough to impact an election with the exception of very close races. Technically it only takes one vote to win an election. So it is reasonable to say that only one instance of fraud could 'impact' an election. Of course really close races generally require a recount in most states, and sometimes a runoff election.   

[illuminati]

“No,” he replied. “In my job looking for voter fraud for the campaign, we didn’t find any– we didn’t find enough fraud to have impacted the result of any election in any of the swing states that we took a look at.”
Block said the campaign asked him to look into various voter fraud claims others were making.

That's a contradictory statement
Either he did find Fraud or he didn't - Simple

What's that crap about "didn't find enough to impact" ?
so he did find Fraud.

[chaos]

I doubt he meant what he said.

Me too. I assume he found plenty of fraud but doesn't want to be Epsteined so he's dropping a hint there.

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

K, 1. There’s still mountains of evidence which is why after 3 years it’s still in being litigated.

2. Voter fraud and election interference are vastly different. If you don’t understand what “election interference” which has been blatantly thrown in our faces since at least 2018 and has now gone almost full communist, then you’re either blind, don’t understand it or dense.

They are still litigating whether Obama is a U.S citizen.   Litigation time span is not relevant as you can continue it almost indefinitely

[illuminati]

I doubt he meant what he said.

Why ? he wasn't posting on Getbig