Author Topic: Another corrupt Democrat  (Read 4109 times)

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21245
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #100 on: January 06, 2024, 04:33:05 PM »
I want to make sure I am clear about your wishes. In the future you would prefer me to address you as 'His Royal Highness' and not Illuminati, or Tony. 'Your' and not 'His' Royal Highness is generally used to address a prince or other members of a royal family. A king is properly addressed as Your Majesty or Your Majesty, Sir. -Thought you might be interested in knowing this, 'His Royal Highness.'

The discussion was originally in reference to someone's preferred pronouns and not names, such as someone's handle, nickname, or given name, honorifics/courtesy titles (a prefix), and/or a suffix.

When I was a kid, my mom instructed my friends to call her by her first name, Mimi as opposed to ma'am because she believed it dated her. She also suggested I call her sis or use her first name. I suppose because, ma'am is the polite way for younger folks to address adult females, my friends had a hard time remembering to call her Mimi. I was a sassy kid; I still called her mom.

What I find confusing is when someone prefers the pronouns, they/them/theirs as if they are many people and not just one person.  Also, it/it/its seems weird to me. Do they mean they are aliens such as in space alien? And then there is ze/hir/hir - I have no clue what this means. To make this pronoun thing even more confusing some folks prefer being address with a combination of pronouns, “they/she” or “they/them/theirs, and she/her/hers. These seem conflicting - are they telling folks they are, in fact, conflicted?

Maybe we could all start addressing each other as Hey you!

What pronouns best apply here? The half man, half woman style of dressing has been around forever.




King Illuminati
or
Royal Highness

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40953
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #101 on: January 06, 2024, 05:14:15 PM »

King Illuminati
or
Royal Highness

Okay thanks, it is (Your) Royal Highness then. I prefer this title you suggested because it is gender neutral and this poses a certain irony, don't you agree?

One thing worth considering about calling yourself King Illuminati is that supposedly the secret society Illuminati no longer exists. And it was never a large group of people. Essentially, this would make you king of nothing and no one.  ;D ;D

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57827
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #102 on: January 06, 2024, 08:43:27 PM »

What pronouns best apply here? The half man, half woman style of dressing has been around forever.


His pronouns are Halloween costume.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Marvin Martian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1963
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #103 on: January 06, 2024, 09:52:42 PM »
Okay thanks, it is (Your) Royal Highness then. I prefer this title you suggested because it is gender neutral and this poses a certain irony, don't you agree?

One thing worth considering about calling yourself King Illuminati is that supposedly the secret society Illuminati no longer exists. And it was never a large group of people. Essentially, this would make you king of nothing and no one.  ;D ;D

I think most people call you pedophile - that or janitor - wife hater - failure - kid fuckr - etc. those all work. It’s so disgusting albeit not surprising, that you cleaned the toilets at a school. Knowing that a pedophile was amonst children - lurking in their bathroom savoring the smells - 🤢 🤮

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22462
  • SC è un asino
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #104 on: January 07, 2024, 07:27:23 AM »
You just can't help yourself can you?

He should apply to be president of Harvard.
Y

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21245
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #105 on: January 07, 2024, 11:42:45 AM »
You just can't help yourself can you?

Nope he can't & yet is oh so busy with so many other things away from Getbig  ::)

Odd he goes searching for such stupid & ridiculous crap to try & legitimise his men
can be women Nonsense - No they can't no more than they can be an elephant or a crocodile.

Biological Facts don't appear to matter to him & his Pretend Fantasy world.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #106 on: January 08, 2024, 10:59:49 AM »
While we are on the subject of gender identity, it seems like a good time to remind some of you that On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its landmark decision in the case Bostock v. Clayton County, which held that the prohibition against sex discrimination in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) includes employment discrimination against an individual on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status.

Why do you constantly try and pass off other people's writings/words as your own?

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34179
  • "Woke is a cult." - Joe Rogan
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #107 on: January 08, 2024, 11:48:54 AM »
Why do you constantly try and pass off other people's writings/words as your own?

Lack of proper footnotes cost a Harvard President her job.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22462
  • SC è un asino
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #108 on: January 08, 2024, 12:01:55 PM »
Lack of proper footnotes cost a Harvard President her job.

It shouldn't have though.

She should have been out after the congressional testimony.
Y

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59954
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #109 on: January 08, 2024, 04:58:42 PM »
Filing alleges ‘improper’ relationship between Fulton DA, top Trump prosecutor

District Attorney Fani Willis improperly hired an alleged romantic partner to prosecute Donald Trump and financially benefited from their relationship, according to a court motion filed Monday which argued the criminal charges in the case were unconstitutional.

The bombshell public filing alleged that special prosecutor Nathan Wade, a private attorney, paid for lavish vacations he took with Willis using the Fulton County funds his law firm received. County records show that Wade, who has played a prominent role in the election interference case, has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022. The DA authorizes his compensation.

The motion, filed on behalf of defendant Michael Roman, a former Trump campaign official, seeks to have the charges against Roman dismissed and for Willis, Wade and the entire DA’s office to be disqualified from further prosecution of the case.

Pallavi Bailey, a Willis spokeswoman, said the DA’s office will respond to Roman’s allegations “through appropriate court filings.” Wade did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It is unclear if the explosive issues raised in the filing undermine the validity of the indictment against Trump and the remaining 14 co-defendants or simply muddy the waters by questioning Willis’ professional ethics.

One ethics expert said that the the allegations, if true, raised serious questions.

Stephen Gillers, a professor emeritus at New York University Law School who has written extensively about legal and judicial ethics, said a closer look at Willis’ decision-making is be needed before it can be determined whether the indictment should be dismissed.

If the allegations are true, Gillers said, “Willis was conflicted in the investigation and prosecution of this case” and wasn’t able to bring the sort of “independent professional judgment” her position requires.”

The filing alleges that Willis and Wade have been involved in a romantic relationship that began before Wade was appointed special prosecutor. It says they traveled together to Napa Valley and Florida, and they cruised the Caribbean using tickets Wade purchased from Norwegian and Royal Caribbean cruise lines — although the filing did not include documentation of those purchases.

The document offers no concrete proof of the romantic ties between Willis and Wade, but says “sources close to both the special prosecutor and the district attorney have confirmed they had an ongoing, personal relationship.”

Roman’s lawyer, Ashleigh Merchant, also said she reviewed the case file in Wade’s ongoing divorce proceedings at the Superior Court Clerk’s Office and made copies of certain documents. But the case file was later improperly sealed because no court hearing was held as required by law, the motion said.

Because the case remains under seal, Merchant said she is not sharing the information she obtained from the divorce file until the seal is lifted. She also said she is asking a judge to unseal the case file.

The motion said the checks sent to Wade from Fulton County and his subsequent purchase of vacations for Willis could amount to honest services fraud, a federal crime in which a vendor gives kickbacks to an employer. It is also possible this could be prosecuted under the federal racketeering statute, the motion said

Merchant, wrote that the “motion is not filed lightly. Nor is it being filed without considerable forethought, research or investigation.” But the issue had to be raised and must be heard because the issues “strike at the heart of fairness in our justice system and, if left unaddressed and unchecked, threaten to taint the entire prosecution of this case, invite error and completely undermine public confidence in any outcome in this proceeding.”

Willis and Wade, the motion contends, “have been engaged in an improper, clandestine personal relationship during the pendency of this case, which has resulted in the special prosecutor, and, in turn, the district attorney, profiting significantly from this prosecution at the expense of the taxpayers.”

A problem with Wade’s appointment is that it was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law, the motion said. The motion also questions Wade’s credentials, contending he has never prosecuted a felony case. (Wade was a prosecutor in Cobb County but it was not immediately clear what cases he handled there.)

Wade entered into his special prosecutor contract on Nov. 1, 2021, just one day before he filed for divorce in Cobb County, the motion said.


Roman’s filing also resurfaces an accusation previously made against Wade: that his two oaths of office were not filed in court prior to his work on the case, thus misrepresenting himself as a duly authorized special prosecutor.

Judge Scott McAfee previously rejected that argument, stating that the requirements don’t apply to contractors working on single cases and that the defendants didn’t establish a constitutional violation or structural defect to the grand jury process that warranted dismissing the case outright.

”If this parrot of a motion is somehow not yet dead, the defendant has failed to establish how (Wade’s) actions resulted in prejudice,” McAfee wrote, alluding to a famous Monty Python sketch. Merchant acknowledged McAfee’s ruling but said that “in the larger context of the various issues surrounding his appointment, Willis’ lack of authority to appoint him and the conflict of interest issues addressed below, the fact that Wade did not file his oath before beginning work takes on new and more significant meaning and, indeed, constitutes a structural defect in the indictment.”

Merchant’s filing came on the day McAfee had set as a deadline for most of the defendants to submit pretrial motions in the sprawling criminal case.

Roman worked as director of Election Day operations for the Trump campaign in 2020. He was charged with seven felony counts in Fulton, most of them conspiracy charges in conjunction with his role helping organize slates of Trump electors in battleground states won by Democrat Joe Biden, including Georgia. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges, and his legal team previously turned down a plea offer from the DA’s office.

Notably, Roman was the only one of the 19 people Willis charged who had not been recommended for indictment by a special grand jury which spent eight months investigating election subversion efforts in Georgia after the 2020 election. A separate grand jury handed up criminal charges.


https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-filing-alleges-improper-relationship-between-fulton-da-top-trump-prosecutor/A2N2OWCM7FFWJBQH2ORAK2BKMQ/






SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15907
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #110 on: January 09, 2024, 11:37:39 AM »
Filing alleges ‘improper’ relationship between Fulton DA, top Trump prosecutor

District Attorney Fani Willis improperly hired an alleged romantic partner to prosecute Donald Trump and financially benefited from their relationship, according to a court motion filed Monday which argued the criminal charges in the case were unconstitutional.

The bombshell public filing alleged that special prosecutor Nathan Wade, a private attorney, paid for lavish vacations he took with Willis using the Fulton County funds his law firm received. County records show that Wade, who has played a prominent role in the election interference case, has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022. The DA authorizes his compensation.

The motion, filed on behalf of defendant Michael Roman, a former Trump campaign official, seeks to have the charges against Roman dismissed and for Willis, Wade and the entire DA’s office to be disqualified from further prosecution of the case.

Pallavi Bailey, a Willis spokeswoman, said the DA’s office will respond to Roman’s allegations “through appropriate court filings.” Wade did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It is unclear if the explosive issues raised in the filing undermine the validity of the indictment against Trump and the remaining 14 co-defendants or simply muddy the waters by questioning Willis’ professional ethics.

One ethics expert said that the the allegations, if true, raised serious questions.

Stephen Gillers, a professor emeritus at New York University Law School who has written extensively about legal and judicial ethics, said a closer look at Willis’ decision-making is be needed before it can be determined whether the indictment should be dismissed.

If the allegations are true, Gillers said, “Willis was conflicted in the investigation and prosecution of this case” and wasn’t able to bring the sort of “independent professional judgment” her position requires.”

The filing alleges that Willis and Wade have been involved in a romantic relationship that began before Wade was appointed special prosecutor. It says they traveled together to Napa Valley and Florida, and they cruised the Caribbean using tickets Wade purchased from Norwegian and Royal Caribbean cruise lines — although the filing did not include documentation of those purchases.

The document offers no concrete proof of the romantic ties between Willis and Wade, but says “sources close to both the special prosecutor and the district attorney have confirmed they had an ongoing, personal relationship.”

Roman’s lawyer, Ashleigh Merchant, also said she reviewed the case file in Wade’s ongoing divorce proceedings at the Superior Court Clerk’s Office and made copies of certain documents. But the case file was later improperly sealed because no court hearing was held as required by law, the motion said.

Because the case remains under seal, Merchant said she is not sharing the information she obtained from the divorce file until the seal is lifted. She also said she is asking a judge to unseal the case file.

The motion said the checks sent to Wade from Fulton County and his subsequent purchase of vacations for Willis could amount to honest services fraud, a federal crime in which a vendor gives kickbacks to an employer. It is also possible this could be prosecuted under the federal racketeering statute, the motion said

Merchant, wrote that the “motion is not filed lightly. Nor is it being filed without considerable forethought, research or investigation.” But the issue had to be raised and must be heard because the issues “strike at the heart of fairness in our justice system and, if left unaddressed and unchecked, threaten to taint the entire prosecution of this case, invite error and completely undermine public confidence in any outcome in this proceeding.”

Willis and Wade, the motion contends, “have been engaged in an improper, clandestine personal relationship during the pendency of this case, which has resulted in the special prosecutor, and, in turn, the district attorney, profiting significantly from this prosecution at the expense of the taxpayers.”

A problem with Wade’s appointment is that it was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law, the motion said. The motion also questions Wade’s credentials, contending he has never prosecuted a felony case. (Wade was a prosecutor in Cobb County but it was not immediately clear what cases he handled there.)

Wade entered into his special prosecutor contract on Nov. 1, 2021, just one day before he filed for divorce in Cobb County, the motion said.


Roman’s filing also resurfaces an accusation previously made against Wade: that his two oaths of office were not filed in court prior to his work on the case, thus misrepresenting himself as a duly authorized special prosecutor.

Judge Scott McAfee previously rejected that argument, stating that the requirements don’t apply to contractors working on single cases and that the defendants didn’t establish a constitutional violation or structural defect to the grand jury process that warranted dismissing the case outright.

”If this parrot of a motion is somehow not yet dead, the defendant has failed to establish how (Wade’s) actions resulted in prejudice,” McAfee wrote, alluding to a famous Monty Python sketch. Merchant acknowledged McAfee’s ruling but said that “in the larger context of the various issues surrounding his appointment, Willis’ lack of authority to appoint him and the conflict of interest issues addressed below, the fact that Wade did not file his oath before beginning work takes on new and more significant meaning and, indeed, constitutes a structural defect in the indictment.”

Merchant’s filing came on the day McAfee had set as a deadline for most of the defendants to submit pretrial motions in the sprawling criminal case.

Roman worked as director of Election Day operations for the Trump campaign in 2020. He was charged with seven felony counts in Fulton, most of them conspiracy charges in conjunction with his role helping organize slates of Trump electors in battleground states won by Democrat Joe Biden, including Georgia. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges, and his legal team previously turned down a plea offer from the DA’s office.

Notably, Roman was the only one of the 19 people Willis charged who had not been recommended for indictment by a special grand jury which spent eight months investigating election subversion efforts in Georgia after the 2020 election. A separate grand jury handed up criminal charges.


https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-filing-alleges-improper-relationship-between-fulton-da-top-trump-prosecutor/A2N2OWCM7FFWJBQH2ORAK2BKMQ/


Her boyfriend hand picked by her to take the case...the most expensive thing her office did and it went unreported.

From another source:

According to the complaint, Wade has raked in at least $653,000 and upwards of $1 million for handling the high-profile case. By virtue of their relationship, that pile of taxpayer money benefits Willis, as they've traveled together to Florida, the Caribbean and Napa Valley, California, adding that Wade has also bought tickets for the pair to travel on Norwegian and Royal Caribbean cruise ships.

In addition to his $250 hourly rate, Wade has also billed Fulton County for thousands of dollars in air travel and hotel stays, according to invoices attached to the filing. He categorized them as interview and research trips.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40953
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #111 on: January 09, 2024, 02:31:10 PM »
His pronouns are Halloween costume.

LOL! Except Halloween costume is not technically a pronoun. But that is cool because it was posted 'tongue in cheek' with no double entendre.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #112 on: January 09, 2024, 07:58:45 PM »
Filing alleges ‘improper’ relationship between Fulton DA, top Trump prosecutor

District Attorney Fani Willis improperly hired an alleged romantic partner to prosecute Donald Trump and financially benefited from their relationship, according to a court motion filed Monday which argued the criminal charges in the case were unconstitutional.

The bombshell public filing alleged that special prosecutor Nathan Wade, a private attorney, paid for lavish vacations he took with Willis using the Fulton County funds his law firm received. County records show that Wade, who has played a prominent role in the election interference case, has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022. The DA authorizes his compensation.

The motion, filed on behalf of defendant Michael Roman, a former Trump campaign official, seeks to have the charges against Roman dismissed and for Willis, Wade and the entire DA’s office to be disqualified from further prosecution of the case.

Pallavi Bailey, a Willis spokeswoman, said the DA’s office will respond to Roman’s allegations “through appropriate court filings.” Wade did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It is unclear if the explosive issues raised in the filing undermine the validity of the indictment against Trump and the remaining 14 co-defendants or simply muddy the waters by questioning Willis’ professional ethics.

One ethics expert said that the the allegations, if true, raised serious questions.

Stephen Gillers, a professor emeritus at New York University Law School who has written extensively about legal and judicial ethics, said a closer look at Willis’ decision-making is be needed before it can be determined whether the indictment should be dismissed.

If the allegations are true, Gillers said, “Willis was conflicted in the investigation and prosecution of this case” and wasn’t able to bring the sort of “independent professional judgment” her position requires.”

The filing alleges that Willis and Wade have been involved in a romantic relationship that began before Wade was appointed special prosecutor. It says they traveled together to Napa Valley and Florida, and they cruised the Caribbean using tickets Wade purchased from Norwegian and Royal Caribbean cruise lines — although the filing did not include documentation of those purchases.

The document offers no concrete proof of the romantic ties between Willis and Wade, but says “sources close to both the special prosecutor and the district attorney have confirmed they had an ongoing, personal relationship.”

Roman’s lawyer, Ashleigh Merchant, also said she reviewed the case file in Wade’s ongoing divorce proceedings at the Superior Court Clerk’s Office and made copies of certain documents. But the case file was later improperly sealed because no court hearing was held as required by law, the motion said.

Because the case remains under seal, Merchant said she is not sharing the information she obtained from the divorce file until the seal is lifted. She also said she is asking a judge to unseal the case file.

The motion said the checks sent to Wade from Fulton County and his subsequent purchase of vacations for Willis could amount to honest services fraud, a federal crime in which a vendor gives kickbacks to an employer. It is also possible this could be prosecuted under the federal racketeering statute, the motion said

Merchant, wrote that the “motion is not filed lightly. Nor is it being filed without considerable forethought, research or investigation.” But the issue had to be raised and must be heard because the issues “strike at the heart of fairness in our justice system and, if left unaddressed and unchecked, threaten to taint the entire prosecution of this case, invite error and completely undermine public confidence in any outcome in this proceeding.”

Willis and Wade, the motion contends, “have been engaged in an improper, clandestine personal relationship during the pendency of this case, which has resulted in the special prosecutor, and, in turn, the district attorney, profiting significantly from this prosecution at the expense of the taxpayers.”

A problem with Wade’s appointment is that it was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law, the motion said. The motion also questions Wade’s credentials, contending he has never prosecuted a felony case. (Wade was a prosecutor in Cobb County but it was not immediately clear what cases he handled there.)

Wade entered into his special prosecutor contract on Nov. 1, 2021, just one day before he filed for divorce in Cobb County, the motion said.


Roman’s filing also resurfaces an accusation previously made against Wade: that his two oaths of office were not filed in court prior to his work on the case, thus misrepresenting himself as a duly authorized special prosecutor.

Judge Scott McAfee previously rejected that argument, stating that the requirements don’t apply to contractors working on single cases and that the defendants didn’t establish a constitutional violation or structural defect to the grand jury process that warranted dismissing the case outright.

”If this parrot of a motion is somehow not yet dead, the defendant has failed to establish how (Wade’s) actions resulted in prejudice,” McAfee wrote, alluding to a famous Monty Python sketch. Merchant acknowledged McAfee’s ruling but said that “in the larger context of the various issues surrounding his appointment, Willis’ lack of authority to appoint him and the conflict of interest issues addressed below, the fact that Wade did not file his oath before beginning work takes on new and more significant meaning and, indeed, constitutes a structural defect in the indictment.”

Merchant’s filing came on the day McAfee had set as a deadline for most of the defendants to submit pretrial motions in the sprawling criminal case.

Roman worked as director of Election Day operations for the Trump campaign in 2020. He was charged with seven felony counts in Fulton, most of them conspiracy charges in conjunction with his role helping organize slates of Trump electors in battleground states won by Democrat Joe Biden, including Georgia. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges, and his legal team previously turned down a plea offer from the DA’s office.

Notably, Roman was the only one of the 19 people Willis charged who had not been recommended for indictment by a special grand jury which spent eight months investigating election subversion efforts in Georgia after the 2020 election. A separate grand jury handed up criminal charges.


https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-filing-alleges-improper-relationship-between-fulton-da-top-trump-prosecutor/A2N2OWCM7FFWJBQH2ORAK2BKMQ/


Her boyfriend hand picked by her to take the case...the most expensive thing her office did and it went unreported.

From another source:

According to the complaint, Wade has raked in at least $653,000 and upwards of $1 million for handling the high-profile case. By virtue of their relationship, that pile of taxpayer money benefits Willis, as they've traveled together to Florida, the Caribbean and Napa Valley, California, adding that Wade has also bought tickets for the pair to travel on Norwegian and Royal Caribbean cruise ships.

In addition to his $250 hourly rate, Wade has also billed Fulton County for thousands of dollars in air travel and hotel stays, according to invoices attached to the filing. He categorized them as interview and research trips.


Unreal how blatant these public servants can be with their corruption.  Just imagine how much goes on that we don't know about. 

Marvin Martian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1963
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #113 on: January 09, 2024, 09:39:19 PM »
LOL! Except Halloween costume is not technically a pronoun. But that is cool because it was posted 'tongue in cheek' with no double entendre.

Actually although you are certainly a pedophile, I think most would prefer to call you the “Thsnk god that nuisance of an old bitch finally died so I no longer have to dump her off to suffer through agonizing g treatment with no one there to comfort her while I go suck strange men’s asshols and cocks in a filthy shit filled public restroom”… because - well that’s EXACTLY what you admitted to doing on here. I guess you are fortunate to have morally bankrupt and obviously unintelligent children, grandchildren, etc living with you. Couldn’t imagine if my father treated my mother so disgustingly.
🤮

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21245
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #114 on: January 09, 2024, 09:47:29 PM »
Actually although you are certainly a pedophile, I think most would prefer to call you the “Thsnk god that nuisance of an old bitch finally died so I no longer have to dump her off to suffer through agonizing g treatment with no one there to comfort her while I go suck strange men’s asshols and cocks in a filthy shit filled public restroom”… because - well that’s EXACTLY what you admitted to doing on here. I guess you are fortunate to have morally bankrupt and obviously unintelligent children, grandchildren, etc living with you. Couldn’t imagine if my father treated my mother so disgustingly.
🤮


!!! Seriously - He's admitted to doing all that on here . ?
I either missed it or forgotten it, though doubt I'd forget that.

Perhaps Prime will give a book long answer complete with quotes & legal documentation
Ect to prove what he was doing is approved of by other Libturd Leftists, Hell he'll probably
Argue that those men were in fact women because Richard now called himself Rachel .
🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Fucked up , back to front world some like to live in.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40953
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #115 on: January 10, 2024, 11:02:46 AM »

!!! Seriously - He's admitted to doing all that on here . ?
I either missed it or forgotten it, though doubt I'd forget that.

Perhaps Prime will give a book long answer complete with quotes & legal documentation
Ect to prove what he was doing is approved of by other Libturd Leftists, Hell he'll probably
Argue that those men were in fact women because Richard now called himself Rachel .
🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Fucked up , back to front world some like to live in.

The reason you missed it is because I never posted it. Marvin Martin is a sick demented person.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #116 on: January 10, 2024, 12:31:39 PM »
Actually although you are certainly a pedophile, I think most would prefer to call you the “Thsnk god that nuisance of an old bitch finally died so I no longer have to dump her off to suffer through agonizing g treatment with no one there to comfort her while I go suck strange men’s asshols and cocks in a filthy shit filled public restroom”… because - well that’s EXACTLY what you admitted to doing on here. I guess you are fortunate to have morally bankrupt and obviously unintelligent children, grandchildren, etc living with you. Couldn’t imagine if my father treated my mother so disgustingly.
🤮

We have a very lightly moderated board.  People cannot post here without thick skin. But one of the rules we do enforce is calling people pedophiles.  You cannot do that.  Thanks for your cooperation. 

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21245
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #117 on: January 10, 2024, 12:34:49 PM »
The reason you missed it is because I never posted it. Marvin Martin is a sick demented person.

That's good to hear - I was doubtful of you doing such
while your wife was very ill.

perhaps Marvin has you either confused with another poster
or has been given erroneous information. 

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31333
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #118 on: January 10, 2024, 06:35:45 PM »
We have a very lightly moderated board.  People cannot post here without thick skin. But one of the rules we do enforce is calling people pedophiles.  You cannot do that. Thanks for your cooperation.


HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAH A.  Talk about the blind eye of hypocrisy.

Since when?  Or is that you can only called selected people pedophiles? 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #119 on: January 10, 2024, 10:22:05 PM »

HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAH A.  Talk about the blind eye of hypocrisy.

Since when?  Or is that you can only called selected people pedophiles?

Silence.  Nobody cares what you think little boy.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31333
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #120 on: January 11, 2024, 06:35:06 AM »
Silence.  Nobody cares what you think little boy.


Awww... the hypocrite can't handle his hypocrisy being pointed out.

As I said more than once, you are either selectively blind or willfully stupid.  Personally, I am going with the stupid explanation. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #121 on: January 11, 2024, 09:05:21 PM »


Awww... the hypocrite can't handle his hypocrisy being pointed out.

As I said more than once, you are either selectively blind or willfully stupid.  Personally, I am going with the stupid explanation.

 ::)

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31333
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #122 on: January 12, 2024, 06:40:49 AM »

Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #123 on: January 12, 2024, 08:17:31 AM »
Unreal how blatant these public servants can be with their corruption.  Just imagine how much goes on that we don't know about.

If there’s anything resembling a real investigation into this, her career will be over and she will be lucky to escape jail time.

Apparently, they took expensive vacations together. I’d bet she was getting a cut of his salary. She was the one green lighting the hours billed.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Another corrupt Democrat
« Reply #124 on: January 12, 2024, 11:39:24 AM »
If there’s anything resembling a real investigation into this, her career will be over and she will be lucky to escape jail time.

Apparently, they took expensive vacations together. I’d bet she was getting a cut of his salary. She was the one green lighting the hours billed.

I agree.