nd nd nd...
you know who looks better in that pic...
...
and this remember is pre 1998...
how can u make statements like oh.... its what the judges think that matter,....
then turn around and make a thread... and post pics of levrone vs coleman 2002... sayin levrone is better... does not the same "its what the judges think" statement apply there too?.....
tsk tsk....
bias man..... when you posted that pic you proved the obvious case which is
... even pre 1998 coleman was a better bb so after he hit his peak.... 1998 so dorian would not have a prayer...against coleman at his best... in fact i think coleman always looked good even pre 1998.. its just that after 1998 THEY COULD NO LONGER DENY HIM..had dorian not retired.... he would have been destroyed and thats not to say he wasnt been destryed before then by coleman and other bb's pre 1998... can you say gifts?
