Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3489395 times)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12025 on: November 05, 2006, 09:18:27 PM »
There you have it. After comparing these shots, the thread is over.

ND & SUCKY's only salvation's the small size of these pics!!


those are actually some of the best quality screencaps I have ever seen

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12026 on: November 05, 2006, 09:19:25 PM »
True.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12027 on: November 05, 2006, 09:25:01 PM »
Quote
Dorian did not bring his trademanrked dryness to this show, but he still had his trademarked density. Teh only thing Shawn had on Dorian in this show was midsection and back separations. Period.

bullshit:


Shawn was better than dorian in every single concievable way that year except for lat width

look at the 94 shots. Dorian looked like marshmellow in all areas except the lower back. That is not density.




Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12028 on: November 05, 2006, 09:34:00 PM »
fantastic 1999 ronnie pics.

no way in hell is dorian better than that, in any year.

sorry.

way too much detail and shape, with 257 pounds of size behind it.

unreal.

Look at the rear lat spread, the arms, that most muscular at the end with the supercut quads, the back double bi, its all covered.

this thread is over.

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12029 on: November 05, 2006, 09:37:36 PM »
the most musculars from the 99 prejudging with Ronnie in the blue trunks are probably the most impressive most muscular shot EVER.

sorry guys, but these fantastic 1999 ronnie shot have ended this debate once and for all.

no way was yates better.

no way.

the whole board will agree after viewing all those 1999 pics.

 :o :o :o :o
Flower Boy Ran Away

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12030 on: November 05, 2006, 09:39:09 PM »
Quote
fantastic 1999 ronnie pics.

no way in hell is dorian better than that, in any year.

sorry.

way too much detail and shape, with 257 pounds of size behind it.

unreal.

It's game over after those pics - Yates' density & dryness are great but overall Coleman's in another league, looking like an anatomy chart. No comparison.

Someone know how to blow these pics up?

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12031 on: November 05, 2006, 09:40:40 PM »
It's game over after those pics - Yates' density & dryness are great but overall Coleman's in another league. No comparison.

agreed.

sorry, Yates was good pretear, but not THAT good.

holy shit.

These shots deserve their own thread!!

fantastic!!
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12032 on: November 05, 2006, 09:42:29 PM »
Quote
Someone know how to blow these pics up?
hopefully, it can be done.

then they can be posted for all to see easily!

Ronnie looks like he has no skin in those most musculars.

Hell, he makes yates look soft!!
Flower Boy Ran Away

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12033 on: November 05, 2006, 09:43:52 PM »
SUCKY ENJOY THOSE COLEMAN PICS TONIGHT.. ;)

Don't waste our time with any excuses you'd be a sore loser.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12034 on: November 05, 2006, 09:44:14 PM »
the shot of Chris and ronnie both hitting most musculars is really really cool!

chris really should have been second at that show.
Flower Boy Ran Away

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12035 on: November 05, 2006, 09:46:50 PM »
Quote
chris really should have been second at that show.

Great conditioning but Wheeler's pics aren't there to compare.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12036 on: November 05, 2006, 09:47:10 PM »
bullshit:


Shawn was better than dorian in every single concievable way that year except for lat width

look at the 94 shots. Dorian looked like marshmellow in all areas except the lower back. That is not density.






  Once again, your analyses sucks. Dorian wins:

 - The relaxed round - he has better taper from the sides and equivalent from the back. Dorian's muscles are proportionally developed from the back and front and also from the sides.

 - Overrall muscularity - Dorian's pectoralis, vastus medialis, biceps femorii, calves, deltoids, lats and trciceps are more muscular than Shawn's.

  He wins the following mandatories:

 - Back double biceps - Dorian's lats are wider&thicker than Ray's, although the latter has comparable separations. Dorian's hams are more striated and his calves are bigger.

 - Front lat spread - Shawn has comparable taper to Dorian in this mandatory - smaller waist but also narrower lats -, but with the diffrence that Dorian's lats flare wider. Points for The Yates.

 - Side triceps - Both have etched serratus and a flat stomach, but Dorian has the thicker triceps, vastus lateralis, more proportional deltoids, with the three heads being more equally developed and thicker calves. Points for The Yates.

 Side chest - Same advantages as above, with Dorian having the thicker and more balanced pectoralis - Shawn might have more striations, but Dorian's muscularity is too much for Shawn.

 - Rear lat spread - Comparable taper, with the difference that Dorian's lats flare much wider. And Sahwn has no advantage in any other muscle.

  They would tie:

 - Abs-And-Thighs - Comparable taper and Dorian has bigger quads and wider lats. But Ray has the more etched abs, so they tie.

 Ray wins:

 - Front bouble biceps - Because of the biceps. That's it.

 - Tehy are comparably dry, but Dorian is harder.

  So, Hulkster in in conclusion: Dorian defeated Shawn in 1994 flat out because he had greater overrall muscularity and comparable in overrall symmetry except from the front, won five mandatories and was harder overrall. Just like Pumpster, you've got owned yet again by me. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

 

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12037 on: November 05, 2006, 09:50:41 PM »
Waiting for SUCKMYASS to work his way down the page to those pics hahahahahahahahahah


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12038 on: November 05, 2006, 09:54:43 PM »
sucky, the thread ended with the postings of the most amazing ronnie pics ever.

where were you? ;D

seriously, even you, ND and IceCold have to conceed that Dorian was not THAT good.

I mean come on...

The whole board will lose respect for you guys if you actually try and argue that dorian was better than THAT. We all know dorian 93 was great. But Ronnie in 99 made him look....not all that great by comparison.

holy mother of god, the shape and detail of Ronnie in 1999 was off the charts.

case closed.
Flower Boy Ran Away

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12039 on: November 05, 2006, 09:55:54 PM »
Goodbye SUCKY. You tried & failed miserably.

ND is unconscious.


Monday morning will be hell gentlemen.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12040 on: November 05, 2006, 10:00:42 PM »


ND is unconscious.

LOL

ND is desperately trying to come up with some argument using the words

"balance", "dryness" "proportion" and "density" to overcome those pics.

I don't think it will work.

Those pics are incredible.
 8)
Flower Boy Ran Away

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12041 on: November 05, 2006, 10:29:44 PM »
  Ok, a few comments:

 - I had already seen most of these pics before in the review of the 1999 by several magazines even in that same year, so you just owned yourselves. ;D ;)

 - Ronnie has great separations and cross-striations, but Dorian in his 1995 form is bigger and makes Ronnie look soft.

 - Ronnie obviously has some gut distension.

 - His abs/serratus are not as good as Dorian's.

 - Ronnie's back is no match for Dorian's in either width or thickness. It only appears like it does because his waist is slightly smaller.

 - Ronnie's arms are not better than Dorian's and this proves it: his triceps looks bigger than it is because it's rounder. Most of his arms size is biceps.

 - LikeI've elucidated before, there are several objective criteria that must be evaluated from different angles while flexing differnt muscles to evaluate a physique, and Dorian takes most of it. The particular musco-skeletal structure of a physique is a matter of choice, and no bodybuilder's with [hysiques as different as Ruhl's and Shawn have won contest, so this doesen't mean shit.

 - Ronnie has more separations, but Dorian has greater density; thus, conditioning would probably go to Dorian.

 - Dorian carried more muscle, since he weighted the same, but was dryer.

 - Kevin at the 1995 Olympia was 250 lbs with the same cross-striations and separations, yet Dorian defeatd him with straight-firsts scores from all judges in all rounds. So these pics don't mean shit. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12042 on: November 05, 2006, 11:11:17 PM »
Prejudging Mr.O 1999

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12043 on: November 05, 2006, 11:12:27 PM »
Prejudging Mr.O 1999

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12044 on: November 05, 2006, 11:13:18 PM »
Prejudging Mr.O 1999

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12045 on: November 05, 2006, 11:14:57 PM »
Mr.O 1999 Posing Coleman

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12046 on: November 05, 2006, 11:15:44 PM »
Mr.O 1999 Posing Coleman

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12047 on: November 05, 2006, 11:16:29 PM »
Mr.O 1999 Posing Coleman

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12048 on: November 05, 2006, 11:17:32 PM »
Mr.O 1999 Posing Coleman

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #12049 on: November 05, 2006, 11:18:41 PM »
Mr.O 1999 Posing Coleman