Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[forcedreps]

Mr.O 1993 Yates Posing

[forcedreps]

Mr.O 1993 Yates Posing

[forcedreps]

Mr.O 1993 Yates Posing

[NeoSeminole]

forcedreps, thank you so much for these pics.

[SWOLETRAIN]

wow they both look so great in these pics.... Ronnies physique is in a league of its own.

[NeoSeminole]

is it just me or does Yates' skin look awful? I'm beginning to wonder if his bad skin contributed to his "grainy" appearance. He has little tiny bumps all over his body.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Pumpy is this shot morphed now bitch? lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

These picture just reaffirm everything I've been saying about Yates at his best and why he is unstopable !!

thanks for the pics forced reps !! Yates legs from top to bottom crush Ronnie's from 1999 , no detail Hulkster lol kid you're in trouble now. 

[NeoSeminole]

[forcedreps]

A few clips from the 1993 and 1999 Mr.O


1993 Mr.Olympia Dorian Yates Posing-routine

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-7282226660836565429

1993 Mr.Olympia Top 6

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-5515511886133795341

1993 Mr.Olympia Posedown

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=4200313280763244568

1993  Mr.Olympia Pre-Judging

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-9092147985835496662

1999 Mr.Olympia Ronnie Coleman Posing

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=2847826446600716095

1999 Mr.Olympia Pre-Judging

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-3248240441699510996

1999 Mr.Olympia Top 6 and Posedown

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=6831985353968272185

[pumpster]

Ok, a few comments:

 - I had already seen most of these pics before in the review of the 1999 by several magazines even in that same year, so you just owned yourselves. 

 - Ronnie has great separations and cross-striations, but Dorian in his 1995 form is bigger and makes Ronnie look soft.

 - Ronnie obviously has some gut distension.

 - His abs/serratus are not as good as Dorian's.

 - Ronnie's back is no match for Dorian's in either width or thickness. It only appears like it does because his waist is slightly smaller.

 - Ronnie's arms are not better than Dorian's and this proves it: his triceps looks bigger than it is because it's rounder. Most of his arms size is biceps.

 - LikeI've elucidated before, there are several objective criteria that must be evaluated from different angles while flexing differnt muscles to evaluate a physique, and Dorian takes most of it. The particular musco-skeletal structure of a physique is a matter of choice, and no bodybuilder's with [hysiques as different as Ruhl's and Shawn have won contest, so this doesen't mean shit.

 - Ronnie has more separations, but Dorian has greater density; thus, conditioning would probably go to Dorian.

 - Dorian carried more muscle, since he weighted the same, but was dryer.

 - Kevin at the 1995 Olympia was 250 lbs with the same cross-striations and separations, yet Dorian defeatd him with straight-firsts scores from all judges in all rounds. So these pics don't mean shit.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Find anyone else here other than a dishonest ND who agrees with your excuses. Haven't seen anyone yet.  

[pumpster]

is it just me or does Yates' skin look awful? I'm beginning to wonder if his bad skin contributed to his "grainy" appearance. He has little tiny bumps all over his body.

Something tells me he also has bad teeth, to go with the skin, so-so structure & imbalances.  I have a feeling that ND & SUCKY personally relate to all of these problems. 

[pumpster]

Pumpy is this shot morphed now bitch? lol

This is where ND & SUCKY show their true colors-unable to address & accept the larger issue at hand they resort to deflections and petty name-calling.

ND is likely just hitting puberty, judging by this need to insult in lieu of content.

[pumpster]

GAME OVER


Embarassing mismatch:

[pumpster]

On Yates' only upper body strongpoint other than tris (back), Coleman's wider, is more muscular, more refined and has a better taper to a smaller waist. At least as dry. A lot more muscular, no doubt about it.

[pumpster]

.

[pumpster]

Yates looking comically small & lacking in refinement when compared!

So much for Yates' supposed triceps advantage-he lacks tri size in comparison-the definition and development's skewed around the smaller side lateral & medical heads. This fools novices who ignore the size deficiency of the long head relative to Coleman:

[pumpster]

.

[pobrecito]

I give Yates the side tricep and ab/thigh. Coleman wins everything else.

[nicorulez]

  Ok, a few comments:

 - I had already seen most of these pics before in the review of the 1999 by several magazines even in that same year, so you just owned yourselves.

 - Ronnie has great separations and cross-striations, but Dorian in his 1995 form is bigger and makes Ronnie look soft.

 - Ronnie obviously has some gut distension.

 - His abs/serratus are not as good as Dorian's.

 - Ronnie's back is no match for Dorian's in either width or thickness. It only appears like it does because his waist is slightly smaller.

 - Ronnie's arms are not better than Dorian's and this proves it: his triceps looks bigger than it is because it's rounder. Most of his arms size is biceps.

 - LikeI've elucidated before, there are several objective criteria that must be evaluated from different angles while flexing differnt muscles to evaluate a physique, and Dorian takes most of it. The particular musco-skeletal structure of a physique is a matter of choice, and no bodybuilder's with [hysiques as different as Ruhl's and Shawn have won contest, so this doesen't mean shit.

 - Ronnie has more separations, but Dorian has greater density; thus, conditioning would probably go to Dorian.

 - Dorian carried more muscle, since he weighted the same, but was dryer.

 - Kevin at the 1995 Olympia was 250 lbs with the same cross-striations and separations, yet Dorian defeatd him with straight-firsts scores from all judges in all rounds. So these pics don't mean shit.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Sucky, from a medical standpoint you are incorrect my friend.  I agree that Dorian had that razor like condition that Ronnie approached but never exceeded.  However, Dorian did not carry more muscle.  For one, Dorian has larger joints as can be appreciated by his wrist size.  Second, although he may have been slightly drier and that is stretch (for Coleman 1999), the difference in weight would have been a pound max.  We are talking the lightest sheen of water; both have equivalent bodyfat compositions.  In fact, Ronnie may be slightly leaner as Dorian never had the etched glutes that Coleman displays.  However, if both were at 3% or so bodyfat and taking into consideration joint size; I would actually give the nod to Coleman.  Regardless, it would be a good show.  I prefer Coleman, but another can easily choose Dorian.  It is what you like and expect in a bodybuilder.  Ronnie's back is easily as wide.  It is impossible to make accurate comparisons as they did not stand side by side.  Pics in the magazines are taken from different perspective, so even if their were a perceptible difference we would not be able to tell by seeing them solo.  That is why the show is judged live and not by pics.  What Hulkster and Pumpster don't understand is that Dorian is damn good and would definitely hold his own.  As I said before, 1995 Doz vs 1999 Coleman is another apples and oranges comparison.

[pumpster]

That is why the show is judged live and not by pics.  What Hulkster and Pumpster don't understand is that Dorian is damn good and would definitely hold his own. 

What you don't understand is that you're the biggest vacillator on here! Your wishy-washiness is of epic proportions.

Pics are in. Take a stand.

[nicorulez]

What you don't understand is that you're the biggest vacillator on here! Your wishy-washiness is of epic proportions.

Pics are in. Take a stand.

Wrong my friend, I prefer Coleman.  However, I am not so naive that it is inconceivable that Dorian would win.  Bodybuilding is not a race; there is not score you shoot for.  It is a show judged by a judging panel with their obvious biases and preferences.  Although I may prefer Coleman, and I do if you bothered to read my thread, others may not.  Bodybuilding is a lot like politics; you can't conceive in a million years why someone would back the other guy.  However, in their defense, they feel the same way about you.  Thus, the conundrum.  Pics are important and Coleaman does look superior, but live shows bring out a whole different aspect of the body.  Thus, I stand by my neutrality with a preference for Coleman.  Never once have I said that an alltime Doz would beat an alltime Ronnie. 

[pumpster]

Wrong my friend, I prefer Coleman.  However, I am not so naive that it is inconceivable that Dorian would win.

These new pics widen the disparaties and further discredit your fence sitting. Your position should be all the clearer now but instead you're mired in obfuscations. Your central position in this thread should be prominent, and never is. Did you vote for Kerry?

I could do the same as you and employ 5 paragraphs basically saying "then on the other hand"...seriously dude grow some balls.

[carvedoutofwood]

What you don't understand is that you're the biggest vacillator on here! Your wishy-washiness is of epic proportions.

Pics are in. Take a stand.

100% TRUTH. I cant read this guys posts anymore, back and forth, back and forth... "although ronnie was good, however... but then again... yet you cant forget... regardless, people always overlook..."

"is it just me or does Yates' skin look awful? I'm beginning to wonder if his bad skin contributed to his "grainy" appearance. He has little tiny bumps all over his body."

Neo thats what ive been saying all along... compared to ronnies flawless skin dorians looks lumpy, which from a distance may look "grainy" but up close just looks like bacne... i think these photos and clips confirmed this

[pobrecito]

The one thing that does bother me about Coleman in 99 is the abdominal distention....looks like crap.