Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

let the record show that 99 Ronnie does not show distension when fully flexed, just like dorian 93 doesn't even though when relaxed he did:



are there any more screencaps of the 99 Ronnie or 93 Dorian out there?

[NarcissisticDeity]

and yates doesn't?

Hmmmmmmm NO because in 1993 he didn't have a torn bicep , tricep , quad lol his biceps were huge

[Hulkster]

His abs are still shite in those pics.

his quads sucked.

his inneer thigh may have been good, but his quads sucked.

his front relaxed pose sucked.

so did his arms and delts from the front:

[NarcissisticDeity]

let the record show that 99 Ronnie does not show distension when fully flexed, just like dorian 93 doesn't even though when relaxed he did:



are there any more screencaps of the 99 Ronnie or 93 Dorian out there?

He shows densition in transition , in poses and relaxed no if ands or buts about that !! 

[Hulkster]

his quads sucked.

his inneer thigh may have been good, but his quads sucked.

his front relaxed pose sucked.

so did his arms and delts from the front:

I was referring to Dorian, of course in those pics.

The dorian side is quick to point out 99 Ronnie's flaws but fails to admit 93 Dorian's flaws.

[NarcissisticDeity]

his quads sucked.

his inneer thigh may have been good, but his quads sucked.

his front relaxed pose sucked.

so did his arms and delts from the front:

His quads are great period its futile for you to argue otherwise , you're an internet-fan , his front relaxed pose I'll give you wasn't great but his 1/4 turns and standing relaxed from the back is untouchable , his delts and arms from the front look great , you like Ronnie's better so you thinks Yates' suck ......wrong

[NarcissisticDeity]

I was referring to Dorian, of course in those pics.

The dorian side is quick to point out 99 Ronnie's flaws but fails to admit 93 Dorian's flaws.

At the 1993 Mr Olympia Dorian Yates had NO MAJOR flaws , he's complete from head to toe , top to bottom , back to front , side to side . he really was first , second and third.

[pobrecito]

Wow, Ronnie looks like shit here Completely out of proportion

[NarcissisticDeity]

Wow, Ronnie looks like shit here Completely out of proportion

Whats funny is Ronnie has the natural edge in a smaller waist & hips yet it does nothing for him overall in this particular pose , because his balance & proportion aren't great and this is exactly why Dorian looks fantastic in this pose.

[delta9mda]

whooooooooooshhhhhhhhh

[Hulkster]

ND, dorian's quads were a major flaw in 93:

esp. compared to Ronnie:


look at these shots - its like NIGHT AND DAY:

notice how shitty dorian's quads are. and notice that compared to Ronnie, his arms and delts suck. and his chest is not as good.

in fact,

his entire pose looks like SHIT compared to THIS:

[Hulkster]

It really says alot that ND is resorting back to these half body shots of yates showing his great abs but not showing his shitty quads.

Ironic that these old pics get used more now since the 99 pics that left no doubt in every sane person's mind that Ronnie would win were posted:

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND, dorian's quads were a major flaw in 93:

esp. compared to Ronnie:



notice how shitty dorian's quads are. and notice that compared to Ronnie, his arms and delts suck. and his chest is not as good.

in fact,

his entire pose looks like SHIT compared to THIS:

A major flaw? you're an internet-fan if you think his quads were a major flaw , hell they're not even a minor flaw the ONLY problem with his quads are upper seperation , and keep looking at parts and saying look how much better Ronnies parts are because his whole sucks , thats why he gets owned in the sidetriceps , sidechest , ab-thigh , front & rear latspreads , backdouble biceps , these are clear cut poses from top to bottom that Ronnie falls by the wayside in when compared to Dorian

Ronnie's major flaws in 1999 Bitch-tits , zero calves and abdominal distension and less than perfect conditioning , he can't overcome these compared to an injury free 257lb Dorian Yates

[Hulkster]

A major flaw? you're an internet-fan if you think his quads were a major flaw

no, it means I can see.

[NarcissisticDeity]

It really says alot that ND is resorting back to these half body shots of yates showing his great abs but not showing his shitty quads.

Ironic that these old pics get used more now since the 99 pics that left no doubt in every sane person's mind that Ronnie would win were posted:

It really says a lot that you have a meltdown because not everyone agrees with you  lets say Ronnie quads are 20X better than Dorian it doesn't matter because his mandatory pose ISN'T Dorian's quads in 93 were just fine his legs smoke Ronnies and his mandatories ate simply better .

[NarcissisticDeity]

no, it means I can see.

See ? like Ronnie's better detailed calves? you seen those as well lol and Tony Pearsons high lats? lol , getting a seeing-eye dog quick !!

[Hulkster]

"less than perfect conditioning"?

If ronnie was any better conditioned he would be bleeding:

[NeoSeminole]

[NarcissisticDeity]

"less than perfect conditioning"?

If ronnie was any better conditioned he would be bleeding:

Why because he has striations? again look at this sidetriceps shot , he has stiated triceps and they're covered in a thin layer of water , less than perfect conditioning , compared to 98 and compared to Dorian , his back is NOT as sharp either he is sharper from the front but overall he's not as conditioned as 98

[NarcissisticDeity]

Oh boy lol another fair & accurate comparision 

[NeoSeminole]

Oh boy lol another fair & accurate comparision

oh boy, another dipshit comment by ND trying to ridicule my comparisons while neglecting the fact they are bias in favor of Dorian.

[Shockwave]

His back does look soft.

[NarcissisticDeity]

oh boy, another dipshit comment by ND trying to ridicule my comparisons.

Oh there is NO trying involved its mission accomplished , if they were fair I would admit to such , but you've skewed them in Ronnie's favor its clear your intentions and bias and I'm just exposing you for what you are. 

[NeoSeminole]

Oh there is NO trying involved its mission accomplished , if they were fair I would admit to such , but you've skewed them in Ronnie's favor its clear your intentions and bias and I'm just exposing you for what you are.

how exactly are my comparisons biased in favor of Ronnie? Please do tell. You haven't really exposed anything as much as just made an empty claim with no evidence to support it.

[nicorulez]

  Oh, but you most definitely have not! There isn't one thiing you said that disproves my claim that density can be merely a visual and not physical property. You're seriously deluded if you think you have disproven me! Than you post saying that water is desner than ice, as if that disproved me! In reality, the fact that I switched the water and ice in the analogy as far as which becomes denser doesen't mean anything, because it doesen't change my claim, which is correct: the water changes in density as it goes from liquid to solid. Wow, lets's see, I want you to empirically demonstrate to me that Dorian's muscles weighted more than Ronnie's for a given size. Let's play! Let's see you pull that off!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Sucky, let me bet you if we took muscle biopsy samples of Ronnie and Dorian, they would not both be the same density.  The variables I wrote about including water (very important), glycogen stores and fat content cannot be definitively determined by visual inspection.  Thus, my point (which was tongue and cheek as I feel the density credo that you and ND spout is total and utter BS) is that density is not a visual aspect but physical phenomena.  If Yates were leaner (according to you and ND he was) and drier, he wold be denser.  What is so difficult for you to comprehend.  This is not rocket science; it is common sense.