ha ha ha, remember what I said about you reiterating my words back to me except leading others to believe I disagreed with you? No kidding the triceps are composed of 3 heads. I just f*cking said that in my last post, you dipshit. Here is the exact quote to prove it.
It doesen't matter that Ronnie has the "long" triceps head biger than Dorian, you idiot, because my point is that this doesen't serve him from most angles an d in most poses. Get it? The " long" head is mostly concealed from sight, so Ronnie's advantage in size is mostly irrelevant. This conmes from the specific confuguration of the Human body. The bottom line is that Dorian's lateral triceps head is better than Ronnie's at any weight, and this is visible. Ronnie only gets to showcase his superior medial and inner triceps head when he's flexing his arms from the front. Even from the back, the triceps mass is mostly concealed from sight by the delts and due to the fact that, again, it is the lateral triceps head that is displayed here. My further point is that, although visible in the rear lat spread and relaxed round from the back, most of the mass of the anteruior and medial triceps heads are still concealed from sight, amking Ronnie's advantage mostly irrelevant. You lose. Again.
So why did you call me a dumbf*ck when all you did was basically repeat what I said? I could say "2 + 2 = 4" and you would still respond "no, you moron, 2 + 2 = 4." You're such a pathetic tool. 
I called you a dumbfuck because you're unable to comprehend that Ronnie's advantage in inner and medial triceps head size is mostly irrelevant from most angles while contracting most muscles.
Furthermore, why don't you use proper names when you talk about the triceps? You refer to them as the "outer," "medial," and "anterior" heads. I thought you had a degree in exercise physiology. They are called the lateral, medial, and long heads. I had no f*cking clue what you were talking about in another post when you said "inner head." Is this what you were taught in college (assuming you actually went)?
There's no need to be excessively pedantic when talking to a layman - such as yourself.
Quit trying to change the subject you dipshit. Earlier, you claimed the triceps long head appears "so small that it's pretty much irrelvant" in the back relaxed and rear lat spread. This is clearly not true. They look pretty large to me.
My point is that it's amss is still mostly concealed, idiot. And they represent a miniscule part both in the relaxed round from the back and the rear lat spread. Hey, retard, post pics where Ronnie compares to this from a muscularity&symmetry stanpoints in the side triceps shot - the one especifically designed to showcase triceps development. You can't.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
