Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3486292 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83206
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17575 on: December 21, 2006, 05:03:41 PM »
more pics to illustrate my point:

both from the 98 O. this time:


not ripped hams.

According to you guys, this means that he was ripped in one pose and not the other in the same contest 3 seconds apart... ::)

I am not as dumb as you think... 8)

You're much dumber than I thought you were , seriously . your dead wrong on this topic and many others

" Dorian Yates is the most overrated bodybuilder of all time "

" Dorian Yates should have lost the 1993 Mr Olympia to Flex Wheeler "

" Dorian's conditioning is a myth "

" Ronnie's calves are more detailed than Dorian's "

" Ronnie has better balance & proportion than Dorian "

" Ronnie was just as hard & dry in 1999 as he was in 1998 "

" Ronnie was alteast 10-12 pounds heavier in 1999 than 1998 "

" Lee Labrada had crappy abdominals and calves "

" The 1994 Mr Olympia was just as controversial as the 1980 Mr Olympia "

" Ronnie dominated Jay Cutler from the back in 2001 despite losing the whole pre-judging "

" Shawn Ray owns Dorian Yates in the back double biceps shot "

" Nasser was close to beating Dorian "

" Dorian only beat guys who weighed less than him "

" Dorian has NO quality "

" Ronnie is aesthetic "

" Dorian has crappy quads "

No you're a LOT dumber than I ever thought lol

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17576 on: December 21, 2006, 05:05:26 PM »
  Funny. That's probably the reason why you kissed my ass innumerable times. ;)

  What a cynical bastard you are. I have already addressed this. I never said that Dorian would defeat the 1999 Ronnie because he defeat Wheeler in 1993, you piece of shit. I said that your whole argument is based around the assumption that Ronnie is a larger version of the 1993 Wheeler, and that would tip the scales in his favor. Yes, the main reason why Dorian defeated the 1993 Wheeler was sheer muscularity and that Wheeler outclassed him at everything else. But it does not follow that this has any relevance for the 1999 Ronnie defeating Wheeler, because Coleman does not posses the same attributes that Wheeler had at 225 lbs at the 1999 Olympia. Ronnie had better shape and taper from the front in the relaxed round in relation to Dorian, yes, but this does not make him a 257 lbs Wheeler. Dorian would still at least more muscular&symmetrical than Coleman from most angles, and also harder. The point ois that Ronnie's advantage in shape would not be enough to compensate for that in the eyes of most judges. I could be wrong, as I've said from the start, and the judges might reward Ronnie because of that and give him the nod. A 257 lbs Wheeler with te same taper, fullness and small joints would the the best bodybuilder ever, even greater than Oliva, but Ronnie is not a larger version of Wheeler. Why? He has a distended gut, large glutes, no calves and his joints are much larger than Wheeler's, giving a far less dramatic impression of roundness to his muscles than Flex. What's so fucking hard here for you to understand, retard? ::)

  You're talking out of your ass, just like when you said that Ronnie had better taper than Wheeler in the abs-and-thighs, a statement so stupid that I'm still shacking my head in disbelief, considering that the abs-and-thighs was Ronnie's worse mandatory. As for the relaxed back round, I ave already said that Ronnie is as good as Wheeler. Not better, just as good. From the sides, Wheeler destroys him with a flat stomach. From the front, Ronnie's clavicle width is not nearly bigger than Flex as Wheeler's waist is smaller than Ronnie's. Amazing that you say that Ronnie had better taper than Wheeler in 1999 when the bottom line is that his stomach is distended. There's such as ting as total taper, and a distended stomach ruins it. You then post a stupid pic that is out of scale and angle, and where Wheeler is beneath his best, and base your entire argument on that. Guess what? Ronnie didn't have a better taper than Flex even in 1998, let alone 1999. Wheeler has better taper from te front, the sides and in the abs-andp-thighs. From the sides, he kills Ronnie and ties from the back.

  Ha ha ha ha ha...I've debated smarter people here, like PraetorFenix, and it boggles the mind that a mental "pobrecito" like you think that you could ever own anyone but yourself. ::)

  Owned ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE



Nobody reads your garbage anymore sucky, just give up. You are the laughing stock of this thread with those outlandish claims easily disproven with visual evidence. Just becuase you write a bunch of long-wided trash does not make you smart hahahahah.....it's pretty obvious that are frustrated with your social status, so you have to come on here and trick yourself into thinking you're better than you really are. BTW, what do you do for a living? And where did you get your "physiology" degree?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83206
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17577 on: December 21, 2006, 05:11:45 PM »
From an interview with Dorian

4. A lot of people say that you are the only pro bodybuilder that could go head to head with Ronnie Coleman.  Like him, you were the only other to be able to gain so much mass in one year. What are your thoughts on this?


A. I get asked that question all the time, and I can’t really give an answer.  I have actually beaten Ronnie, but then he wasn’t at the stage he is now.  He is probably carrying more muscle than I did, but I feel I had better conditioning than him.  It would be close but that’s down to the judge’s decision as always.  All the things that we have in common – Lee Haney, Ronnie Coleman and myself – is that we are all stable mentally, training hard, not messing around partying.  You have to keep the focus and it’s usually the mind that is the deciding factor, over physical capabilities.



NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83206
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17578 on: December 21, 2006, 05:15:02 PM »
I love this quote


I’m genetically strongest in my calves.  I haven’t trained my calves for over three years and they are still probably better than anyone else in Pro bodybuilding.



Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17579 on: December 21, 2006, 05:16:05 PM »
if you guys really think that Ronnie was any softer in 99 from the waist down than in 98, well, then you are really being naive in your efforts to make Peter look like a hero ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17580 on: December 21, 2006, 05:16:46 PM »
This thread will never end.... :P
A

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17581 on: December 21, 2006, 05:18:06 PM »
From an interview with Dorian

4. A lot of people say that you are the only pro bodybuilder that could go head to head with Ronnie Coleman.  Like him, you were the only other to be able to gain so much mass in one year. What are your thoughts on this?


A. I get asked that question all the time, and I can’t really give an answer.  I have actually beaten Ronnie, but then he wasn’t at the stage he is now.  He is probably carrying more muscle than I did, but I feel I had better conditioning than him.  It would be close but that’s down to the judge’s decision as always.  All the things that we have in common – Lee Haney, Ronnie Coleman and myself – is that we are all stable mentally, training hard, not messing around partying.  You have to keep the focus and it’s usually the mind that is the deciding factor, over physical capabilities.




I find it pathetic that Dorian himself can admit that Ronnie was an infant when he beat him, but that the dorian side cannot and tries to argue he was the same in 96 as he was in 99.. ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17582 on: December 21, 2006, 05:34:23 PM »
it's pretty obvious that are frustrated with your social status, so you have to come on here and trick yourself into thinking you're better than you really are.

No one at this board is more intelligent that me. No one.

::)



pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17583 on: December 21, 2006, 05:40:17 PM »
::)




I truly do believe my quote there is very accurate - it is the only way to explain SMM's actions in this thread.

I would have zero problem with his posts so long as he provided some evidence as ND does so well.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83206
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17584 on: December 21, 2006, 06:04:34 PM »
I find it pathetic that Dorian himself can admit that Ronnie was an infant when he beat him, but that the dorian side cannot and tries to argue he was the same in 96 as he was in 99.. ::)

See you can never stick to the topic NO ONE ever claimed that Ronnie was the same in 1996 as 1999 thats your bullshit claim , a very common theme with you is to misquote people , I said Coleman by 1996 was a top tier bodybuilder and he was roughly the same as he was in 1998 Nineteen-Ninety-Eight he was 250/255pounds  pounds in 1996/1997 and the ONLY major difference was he was completely dry in 1998 and struggled with his overall conditioning before working with Chad , and its funny also that Yates outright says he had better conditioning but according to Hulkster thats a " myth " Ronnie was dryer than Yates  ::) but Dorian is wrong too , and so is Peter and so am I  ::) you have a LOT to learn and the best part is he hasn't trained calves in 3-fucking-years and they still shit all over Coleman  ;)


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17585 on: December 21, 2006, 06:33:23 PM »
You're much dumber than I thought you were , seriously . your dead wrong on this topic and many others

" Dorian Yates is the most overrated bodybuilder of all time "
This is true.

" Dorian Yates should have lost the 1993 Mr Olympia to Flex Wheeler "
I revised my opinion. But he should have lost to shawn in 94

" Dorian's conditioning is a myth "
well, ronnie.'s was better in almost all bodyparts except for abs and lower back.

" Ronnie's calves are more detailed than Dorian's "
in 99, they might be. they were just smaller and had crappy shape.

" Ronnie has better balance & proportion than Dorian "
he does. you are the ONLY one besides Pubic who thinks Dorian "twigs on a redwoood" Yates had great balance.

" Ronnie was just as hard & dry in 1999 as he was in 1998 "
proven time after time after time. And Peter has nothing to back his claims up.

" Ronnie was alteast 10-12 pounds heavier in 1999 than 1998 "
I have seen ronnie's 98 weight quoted as 247 before..

" Lee Labrada had crappy abdominals and calves "
they weren't exactly world class...

" The 1994 Mr Olympia was just as controversial as the 1980 Mr Olympia "
very true.

" Ronnie dominated Jay Cutler from the back in 2001 despite losing the whole pre-judging "
you are the only idiot in history to think that Jay's back in 2001 was anywhere neaer the level of Ronnie's...

" Shawn Ray owns Dorian Yates in the back double biceps shot "
true in 94.

" Nasser was close to beating Dorian "
spoken like a true newbie ::) In 97 he was close

" Dorian only beat guys who weighed less than him "
nasser almost beat him, Dillet had no back. otherwise very true.

" Dorian has NO quality "
depends on the year..94 wasn't exactly anything to write home about.

" Ronnie is aesthetic "
in 98/99 most people agree with me.

" Dorian has crappy quads "
very true to all but you and pubic.

No you're a LOT dumber than I ever thought lol
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17586 on: December 21, 2006, 06:35:53 PM »
LOL what great quality in 94...
 ::)


for a Mr. Olympia, this is about as 'no quality' as you can get... :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17587 on: December 21, 2006, 07:18:40 PM »
if you guys really think that Ronnie was any softer in 99 from the waist down than in 98, well, then you are really being naive in your efforts to make Peter look like a hero ::)


but according to you and pumpster (where ever he is - on the bowflex), peter is right in saying that ronnie has the best back of all time.

 ::)



throughout 700 pages, you've taken facts and applied them ONLY to your point of view.

its ok when PM says ronnie has the best back of all time.

not ok when PM says that ronnie is better at a lighter weight and in better shape in 98 then 99 bc the almighty hulkster doestn agree - even though has absolutely qualifications to call anyone out - and yes we know you have eyes and 'can see the evidence'.

 ::)
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17588 on: December 21, 2006, 07:19:38 PM »
I know how it is to debate with people less intelligent than you.  My advice would be to try not to get so worked up or angry about it.  Instead turn it into something positive.  Realize that you are intelligent and that not everyone can see it the way you do because they don't have the skills to do so.  If they were as intelligent as you, perhaps they may not be having this discussion in the first place.

  What an arrrogant statement coming from you. You haven't addressed any of my posts, and yet proclaim to be some bodybuilding expert. I've checked out your website and you give the most biased and generalized assesments of physiques I've ever seen. You don't even have the gut to admit that Coleman's distended gut was a severe symmetrical liability.

  At another thread, you made a bullshit statement about how women like good-looking guys. Then I wrote a very long explanation for you, from the viewpoint of evolutionary biology, wnhy you were wrong. Several people complimented my post. And, surprise, surprise, you didn't say a thing, You are the most pathetic individual here, always writing that Ronnie is better than Dorian without ever giving any explanations. Go fuck yourself, you son of a c.unt :D

SUCKMYMUSCLE.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17589 on: December 21, 2006, 07:20:20 PM »
Nobody reads your garbage anymore sucky, just give up. You are the laughing stock of this thread with those outlandish claims easily disproven with visual evidence. Just becuase you write a bunch of long-wided trash does not make you smart hahahahah.....it's pretty obvious that are frustrated with your social status, so you have to come on here and trick yourself into thinking you're better than you really are. BTW, what do you do for a living? And where did you get your "physiology" degree?

   ::)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17590 on: December 21, 2006, 07:22:22 PM »
   ::)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Game. Set. Match.  8)

It only took me 3 posts to defeat this twat! hahahaha.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17591 on: December 21, 2006, 07:25:49 PM »
::)




  NeoSperminole, you nut-rider, I'm still waiting for you to explain the three things I demanded you to previously:

 1. To prove that Dorian's lats were exactly as wide as Dorian's in 1999.

 2. To explain how exactly Ronnie's distended gut would not compromise him symmetry-wise. How can a man who looks pregnant win the symmetry round of a contest is beyond me.

 3. Provide evidence that a bodybuilder has ever won the rear lat spread and the back relaxed round due to possesin the better inner and medial triceps head, especially considering that only the back part of it is visible in these two poses. ::)

  Until you do so, you dumb shit, you have no right to take the moral high ground about anything. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17592 on: December 21, 2006, 07:28:15 PM »
Game. Set. Match.  8)

It only took me 3 posts to defeat this twat! hahahaha.

  You didn't defeat anyone little guy. I have gone into detail about why you're wrong, and all you did was post a few out of scale and angle pics prove that you're right. Go to ironage and say that Ronnie 1999 had a better taper than Flex Wheeler at his best, and you'll be laughed out of there. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17593 on: December 21, 2006, 07:36:57 PM »
" Dorian Yates is the most overrated bodybuilder of all time "
This is true.

" Dorian Yates should have lost the 1993 Mr Olympia to Flex Wheeler "
I revised my opinion. But he should have lost to shawn in 94

" Dorian's conditioning is a myth "
well, ronnie.'s was better in almost all bodyparts except for abs and lower back.

" Ronnie's calves are more detailed than Dorian's "
in 99, they might be. they were just smaller and had crappy shape.

" Ronnie has better balance & proportion than Dorian "
he does. you are the ONLY one besides Pubic who thinks Dorian "twigs on a redwoood" Yates had great balance.

" Ronnie was just as hard & dry in 1999 as he was in 1998 "
proven time after time after time. And Peter has nothing to back his claims up.

" Ronnie was alteast 10-12 pounds heavier in 1999 than 1998 "
I have seen ronnie's 98 weight quoted as 247 before..

" Lee Labrada had crappy abdominals and calves "
they weren't exactly world class...

" The 1994 Mr Olympia was just as controversial as the 1980 Mr Olympia "
very true.

" Ronnie dominated Jay Cutler from the back in 2001 despite losing the whole pre-judging "
you are the only idiot in history to think that Jay's back in 2001 was anywhere neaer the level of Ronnie's...

" Shawn Ray owns Dorian Yates in the back double biceps shot "
true in 94.

" Nasser was close to beating Dorian "
spoken like a true newbie  In 97 he was close

" Dorian only beat guys who weighed less than him "
nasser almost beat him, Dillet had no back. otherwise very true.

" Dorian has NO quality "
depends on the year..94 wasn't exactly anything to write home about.

" Ronnie is aesthetic "
in 98/99 most people agree with me.

" Dorian has crappy quads "
very true to all but you and pubic.

No you're a LOT dumber than I ever thought lol



1)  you mean the most dominant of all time?  how can you be the most dominant, beat the best at their best, and also be considered overrated.  i have never heard from a qualified person (judge, former bber) that yates is overrated.  you dont count.  i said qualified.

2) why would dorian have lost to someone 5'6 200 lbs. who is not harder or dryer than himself?

3)  ronnie's conditioning better?  

maybe if you consider being softer and holding more water and having gyno in better condition.

4)  who cares how detailed ronnie's calves were.  they were too small with shitty shape and ruined his balance in virtually every shot.  

5)  ronnie and dorian both have good balance.  yates' arms a bit small and so are ronnie's calves.  the one criteria that would little or no effect bc both are pretty even.

6)  peter was at the contest in both 98 and 99.  he is paid to review contests and has been paid to do that for the past 30 years.  i'd say he's more than qualified.  what do you do for a living?  it has NOTHING to do with bodybuilding.  (thank god).

7)  labrada didnt have 'worldclass' abs or calves.  but he was a world class bber.  would you rather have what you consider to be 'worldclass' for a few bodyparts or be an actual worldclass bber who finished top 4 in the Olympia for 7 straight years?

8) not even close.  1980 and the 94.  arnold showed up way too small.  despite how yates look, he was never out of shape.  not his best shape, but his best was soo much better than anyone else's.

9)  shawn is too small to compete with dorian IN ANY SHOT from head to toe.  not to mention yates is harder and dryer.  

WHEN WILL YOU UNDERSTAND HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS.  THAT IS THE REASON WHY GUYS TAKE DIURETICS.  THEY DONT TAKE DIURETICS FOR STRIATIONS, DETAILS, OR WHATEVER ELSE YOU CAN THINK OF

10) nasser was close, but once all angeles (side and back), it was very apparent that yates deserved to win.  i have never read anything from nasser about how he should have won.  if you have, please post.

11) acutally coleman is the one who only beat guys smaller than him.  other than gunter in 02, everyone was smaller than ronnie.  nasser, paul, louie, jp, francois, levrone, etc. were bigger or very similar in size to dorian.  much more so than jay, dexter, gustavo, flex, chris, etc.

11) yates has tremendous quality.  no one has matched his combo of mass and conditioning.  

12) ronnie is asethetic.  even when he is heavier, he has decent asethetics.  much more so than dorian ever did.  but if asethetics mattered at all, ahmend haider would be mr. olympia.

13) yates quads were a bit strange.  however, he had some of the best teardrops of all time and no one had harder legs.  no one else can do that leg stomp that yates does and have nothing move or jiggle.


hulkster, you have been owned more times in this thread than ronnie was by yates during dorian's career.

 ;D
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17594 on: December 21, 2006, 07:38:36 PM »
  I have gone into detail about why you're wrong


Unfortunately, anything you say holds zero credibility becuase you have no proof of what you claim. I'm not so sure why you can't seem to understand this concept.

Oh, and what do you do for a living and where did you get your "degree"?

I suspect you will not answer this for fear of being laughed off GetBig.

I have reduced sucky to the true failure that he truly is.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17595 on: December 21, 2006, 07:45:40 PM »
Quote
I don't think the issue of Dorian's conditioning is easy to give to Dorian.  I can easily see a good argument in favour of Ronnie having superior conditioning.

so do I:

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17596 on: December 21, 2006, 07:48:40 PM »
Nope, Dorian had better condition


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17597 on: December 21, 2006, 07:51:53 PM »

but according to you and pumpster (where ever he is - on the bowflex), peter is right in saying that ronnie has the best back of all time.

 ::)



throughout 700 pages, you've taken facts and applied them ONLY to your point of view.

its ok when PM says ronnie has the best back of all time.

not ok when PM says that ronnie is better at a lighter weight and in better shape in 98 then 99 bc the almighty hulkster doestn agree - even though has absolutely qualifications to call anyone out - and yes we know you have eyes and 'can see the evidence'.

 ::)

hold on a minute. We only keeping bringing up the back comment because it is fuckin' hilarious that for 600 pages Peter is viewed as God and then the Ronnie comment comes up and he is dismissed like yesterday's newspaper.

the key difference that you missed (as usual - the dorian side always seems to miss the crucial concepts) is that there is SUPPORT for the idea that Dorian had the best back ever.

I do not agree with this because I think the support for ronnie's being better is stronger, but none the less, the support is there.

The issue of Ronnie's conditioning in 98 vs 99 is that the support is NOT there.

I have shown countless comparisons showing no real difference.

Peter's words are backed up by....peters words ONLY.

that is not enough by itself.

ND can post all the half flexed/poor lighting shots he wants, but the fac is that when fully flexed head on, there is NO difference.

once again: look - NO real difference:



Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17598 on: December 21, 2006, 07:52:44 PM »
Nope, Dorian had better condition



hahaha God I hope you were joking with that 1997 pic..
Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17599 on: December 21, 2006, 07:54:43 PM »
hold on a minute. We only keeping bringing up the back comment because it is fuckin' hilarious that for 600 pages Peter is viewed as God and then the Ronnie comment comes up and he is dismissed like yesterday's newspaper.

the key difference that you missed (as usual - the dorian side always seems to miss the crucial concepts) is that there is SUPPORT for the idea that Dorian had the best back ever.

I do not agree with this because I think the support for ronnie's being better is stronger, but none the less, the support is there.

The issue of Ronnie's conditioning in 98 vs 99 is that the support is NOT there.

I have shown countless comparisons showing no real difference.

Peter's words are backed up by....peters words ONLY.

that is not enough by itself.

ND can post all the half flexed/poor lighting shots he wants, but the fac is that when fully flexed head on, there is NO difference.

once again: look - NO real difference:





Hulkster, give up. Any outsider will give credibility to someone who was at the show over someone posting pictures on the internet. Plus, it's fairly clear on the 98 and 99 videos that Ronnie was more conditioned in 98.