ha ha ha ha, wtf? How do you figure I'm the stupidest person on getbig? I have owned you left and right, and I have intelligently defended myself against other members smarter than you. Just so you know, I dumb myself down a lot in the gossip section so that posters with your IQ can understand me. Try reading some of my discussions with usmokepole in the religious section.
Someone who says that Nasser's back was as wide and thick as Dorian, that the law of cause and effect is not explained by logic, that the inner triceps head is relevant in the rear lat spread and that Ronnie's gut was under control at the 2003 Olympia isn't intelligent at all. The proof? I'm still waiting for you to substantiate
any of your claims. Prove that:
1. Any bodybuilder has won the rear lat spread over another competitor with a better back in virtue of having a better inner and medial triceps head - which is barely visible in this mandatory.
2. That Ronnie's gut, at the 2003 Olympia, was not visible from the sides and from the front in the symmetry round and during most side mandatories.
3. That Nasser's back was on Dorian's league in terms of width&thickness. I find this one particularly bizare. Do your really believe this
You don't win the rear lat spread and the back double biceps just by having a harder back. I can see this argument when it comes to Dorian vs Jean-Pierre Fux, because the latter was at least as wide&thick as Dorian from the back, and Dorian defeated him mostly due to better hardness and separations. But when it comes to Nasser, it's obvious that his major liability was lat width&thickness: Nasser's back had the width&thickess of Wheeler, and with the added liability that he lacked separations.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
