Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

.

[IceCold]

exactly.

so you are saying that fuzzy blurry pics do that better than crisp clear ones?

 

god you are stupid:

yes - to the dark one.

nothing else matches ronnie's color in the last pic - resolution, source, etc. have nothing to with someone's complexion. 

that's the issue - the descrepency between the 'fake' and real pictures and videos. 

source of the picture has nothing to do with it - ronnie's color should be the same in every picture - it is except 'your's bc it isnt accurate. 

[Hulkster]

i've already said numerous times that i dont beleive that the pictures are fake, but the lightning was tampered with to enhance ronnie.  its just easier to type the word fake.

but you are missing the whole point.

what you are saying about the lighting CANNOT happen.

"tampering" with the brighness of the pic will not make a difference in detail.

here is the light coloured pic darkened with increased contrast:

notice: it makes no difference in how ronnie looks.

the RESOLUTION is what makes detail/vascularity etc visible.

not brightness or even contrast:

[Hulkster]

Here are my pics, one from matts website, the other tampered with:


and the two screencaps:

[Hulkster]

notice: you can ONLY see ronnie's chest striations and fine arm vascularity in the CLEAR pics.

What Icecold is saying about contrast/brightness/lighting/whatever has NOTHING to do with anything.

the detail and vascularity is already on Ronnie in 'real life'

but a blurry fuzzy pic no matter HOW you enhance it WILL NOT show any of it.

Now, hopefully we are done with this retarded issue.

[Hulkster]

98 vs 99 screencap, for ND

[Shockwave]

Ronnie 98 > 99.
Much harder. Much drier. Much seperation much more clear.

Why is it so hard for you to admit that 99 Ronnie was holding water? You can see where the muscles fade and their is a lack of clarity between groups.. that is holding water!

[Hulkster]

Ronnie 98 > 99.
Much harder. Much drier. Much seperation much more clear.

Why is it so hard for you to admit that 99 Ronnie was holding water? You can see where the muscles fade and their is a lack of clarity between groups.. that is holding water!

but don't forget that Ronnie's quads in 98 were smooth compared to 99.

this is specifically mentioned in ironman's magazine review of the 99 show. Ronnie is praised for dramatically improving his quad cuts.

So, not all areas were harder in 98 than in 99.

besides, I think everyone can agree that the SLIGHT difference in hardness was worth the extra fullness and size.

Look at it this way:

Ronnie in 98 vs 99 was no different than dorian in 92 vs. 93.

In both cases they put on size and increased their fullness but BOTH of them lost some hardness as a result..Shawn Ray mentions dorian's 93 loss of hardess in the Flex mag review of the contest...and like ND loves to say, he was there!

However, BOTH of them looked better for it, because the loss in hardess was minimal compared to the dramatic increase in fullness:

[NarcissisticDeity]

ha ha ha ha, let me get this right... Dorian was 255 lbs in 95? You mean he was even smaller than 99 Ronnie?

ha ha ha ha  , get it straight Dorian was 260 lbs in 95 , according to the MC Lee Haney  and even if he were 255 pounds you crow about how he'd be even ' smaller ' than Ronnie 99 lol like 2 pounds means he'd be ' smaller ' factor in him being one inch shorter and he's not holding any water , dry Ronnie out like Dorian was in  1995 and he shrinks to 244 pounds like the 2001 ASC 

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL I love how ND can be stupid enough to claim that 99 ronnie had a layer of water under his skin but also claim that 94 dorian was 'bone dry'

 

Its amazing how stupid this man can be

I love owning you  I can't understand why you post this nonsense , you should really , really do some research before you type such nonsense because you run the risk of getting owned , which you always end up getting lol

Lets see you post a DVD still VS a crappy screen capture from a poor quality version of Yates from YouTube and think you accomplished something , you're so fucking desperate to try and recover from your ass-kicking , you post 99 shots of Ronnie to Dorian 1992/1996 and now you post a couple of mediocre shots of Dorian and claim he's ' holding water ' you know very little especially considering you keep insisting Ronnie  1999 is better conditioned than Dorian

points to ponder 1994 Dorian's tan sucked , the quality of the video posted on YouTube sucks , and Dorian was done dry in 1994

[NarcissisticDeity]

1994    Dorian never had a problem with water , his problem was torn muscles

[NarcissisticDeity]

More from 94 , Hulkster do some research it helps lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

but don't forget that Ronnie's quads in 98 were smooth compared to 99.

this is specifically mentioned in ironman's magazine review of the 99 show. Ronnie is praised for dramatically improving his quad cuts.

So, not all areas were harder in 98 than in 99.

besides, I think everyone can agree that the SLIGHT difference in hardness was worth the extra fullness and size.

Look at it this way:

Ronnie in 98 vs 99 was no different than dorian in 92 vs. 93.

In both cases they put on size and increased their fullness but BOTH of them lost some hardness as a result..Shawn Ray mentions dorian's 93 loss of hardess in the Flex mag review of the contest...and like ND loves to say, he was there!

However, BOTH of them looked better for it, because the loss in hardess was minimal compared to the dramatic increase in fullness:

Why do you type? why continue to embarrass yourself? Dorian's hardness in no way , shape or form suffered from 1992-1993 once again you showcase how little you know , I have every magazine coverage from the 1993 Mr Olympia , and you're full of shit saying Shawn Ray mentions Dorian's ' loss ' of hardness , now you're making shit up because you have nothing to work with , I will always call you out on your bullshit kid

I.F.B.B. judge Roger Schwab

Man-mountain Dorian Yates was certainly the top gun in the 1993 Mr Olympia shootout. He was much bigger , better and harder than ever , and while his is never the prettiest physique on stage , he's assuredly the most God-awful muscular superman this sport has yet seen. Though Yates was lighter than Lou Ferrigno or Paul Dillett , he appeared to be the biggest man on stage-by far- and the hardest , dominating from beginning to end and every step in between.

eight time Mr Olympia winner Lee Haney on Dorian Yates as he appeared at the 1993 Mr Olympia

" No doubt about it , Dorian was the winner . He's gotten bigger , with even more muscularity and detail. Fantastic! Out of sight. Y'know he was over and beyond a champion. He knows his body . It'll be hard for anyone to unseat him . "

When I get home from work I'll post more quotes of how Dorian was just ad hard & dry as 1992 while being 15 pounds heavier , so try doing some research before you make any more stupid claims because whenever you stumble I'll be there to correct you and your bullshit , and Oh I have Flex magazine's coverage from the 1993 Mr Olympia and I'll be looking for your claim from Shawn 


 

[Hulkster]

don't worry, its there.

[RocketSwitch625]

Monster balance. LOL

[RocketSwitch625]

Not one picture of Coleman could match this:

[RocketSwitch625]

So much for the "flat back" that Hulkster always talks about.

Pwned. LOL

[RocketSwitch625]

1994 and with fantastic arms on both sides:

[IceCold]

notice: you can ONLY see ronnie's chest striations and fine arm vascularity in the CLEAR pics.

What Icecold is saying about contrast/brightness/lighting/whatever has NOTHING to do with anything.

the detail and vascularity is already on Ronnie in 'real life'

but a blurry fuzzy pic no matter HOW you enhance it WILL NOT show any of it.

Now, hopefully we are done with this retarded issue.

the blurry pic was a true representation of the contest - by displaying ronnie's color.  however, it isnt that good of a pic bc its blurry - however its still real.

the darkest pic of ronnie enhances everything.  but ronnie's color doesnt match anything else, that's why its fake.  regardless of the source, ronnie's complexion would not be that dramatic - espeically if taken from 2 digital sources. 

[RocketSwitch625]

Hulkster's favourite picture of Coleman. He keeps a copy of this under his pillow. LOL

[Man of Steel]

This thread is the biggest pile of shit on Getbig.

[donthate1]

This thread is the biggest pile of shit on Getbig.


HAHAHAHA!! I must agree.  You beat me too it!

[RocketSwitch625]

Even Coleman at his best would struggle to compete with the guy in the middle here:

[RocketSwitch625]

[Iceman1981]

.

The DVD caps are closer in color to the VHS caps than the video on YouTube.