Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[willie mosconi]

ronnie did look fabulous at the 96 NOC though. I thought flex and ronnie presented two of the best physiques of all-time at that show.

[suckmymuscle]

again, more ND delusion. You are one of probably only two people left on the planet who thinks that Dorian's back double bi is more detailed than Ronnie's..



uttter nonsense.

  Nice of you to compare a grea shot, of Coleman's back, with one of Dorian's worst. Compare this!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

  This pic ND posted is priceless! The E-N-O-R-M-O-U-S superiority, of Yates' back, is so obvious that it doesen't even require elucidation. He surpasses Ronnie in width, thickness, etchiness, details, structural symmetry...everything!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[Hulkster]

how can someone have great structural symmetry in the back without biceps?

[freeagain]

how can someone have great structural symmetry in the back without biceps?

yes cuz the back and biceps are two different muscle groups .. you f'uckin idiot !! 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dorian was 242lbs in 1992 , 1993 he was 257lbs thats a 15lb advantage from one year to the next and you could clearly see how much bigger he was without losing any hardness

Ronnie ws 250lbs in 1997 and 249lbs in 1998 now you're out of your mind to think thats a dramatic improvement in terms of size & dimensions , he did improve his hardness in 1998 and his appearence looked it , now in 1999 he was 257lbs but not as hard a 7lb weight gain and you can clearly see it from 98-to-99 but its still not as dramatic as Dorian's 15lb weight gain from one year to the next , Ronnie size-wise in 1996/1997/1998 were all roughly the same , in 1999 he was 7lbs bigger which makes a difference , which is why is conditioning was slightly off , but in the black & white pic of Dorian & Ronnie , which is from 1996 I believe , Dorian is 257lbs and Ronnie is around 250lbs , you think even with a 7lb pound weight advantage he's going to suddenly be wider or bigger than Yates? we know he wouldn't be as dry .

[sculpture]

Figures mean very little unfortunatly. Bbers are notorious for exaggerating bodyweights and even if those numbers you oft quote were accurate and verified, they still carry little relevance - the proof is in the photos.

Ronnie of 98/99 is light years ahead of his 96 form.

Any insinuation that by virtue of his similar bodyweights in those years, Ronnie would succumb to Yates is rendered weak when you look at the photos/videos.

[Hulkster]

yes cuz the back and biceps are two different muscle groups .. you f'uckin idiot !! 

but you can't have an impressive back double bi (in terms of the back) without them.

Its like having great biceps with no triceps: your arms loose impressiveness.

When I see a Yates back double bi, it would look great if he had no arms - seriously. the poor arms ruin the look of the back for me.

And, to me, the calves are not a direct component of how good your back is.
the arms are.(since I know ND will chime in about how Ronnie's back double bi is not as good because of his calves).

[NarcissisticDeity]

Figures mean very little unfortunatly. Bbers are notorious for exaggerating bodyweights and even if those numbers you oft quote were accurate and verified, they still carry little relevance - the proof is in the photos.

Ronnie of 98/99 is light years ahead of his 96 form.

Any insinuation that by virtue of his similar bodyweights in those years, Ronnie would succumb to Yates is rendered weak when you look at the photos/videos.

Light years? talk about an overstatement , look at this pic , I think he looks amazing , his midsection is shredded , his abs even look good , his chest looks full and he has cross-striations in his quads something he didn't have in 98 or 99 !! he looks awesome in 1996 and he was competing at 250lbs , so to say he was lightyears away from 98 is not accurate , we're not talking about Ronnie 1992 or 1994 , then you could say he was light years ahead , but not from 1996 on !!

[NarcissisticDeity]

1996 Again

[pumpster]

Dorian was 242lbs in 1992 , 1993 he was 257lbs thats a 15lb advantage from one year to the next and you could clearly see how much bigger he was without losing any hardness

Ronnie ws 250lbs in 1997 and 249lbs in 1998 now you're out of your mind to think thats a dramatic improvement in terms of size & dimensions , he did improve his hardness in 1998 and his appearence looked it , now in 1999 he was 257lbs but not as hard a 7lb weight gain and you can clearly see it from 98-to-99 but its still not as dramatic as Dorian's 15lb weight gain from one year to the next , Ronnie size-wise in 1996/1997/1998 were all roughly the same , in 1999 he was 7lbs bigger which makes a difference , which is why is conditioning was slightly off , but in the black & white pic of Dorian & Ronnie , which is from 1996 I believe , Dorian is 257lbs and Ronnie is around 250lbs , you think even with a 7lb pound weight advantage he's going to suddenly be wider or bigger than Yates? we know he wouldn't be as dry .

More in-depth, dweeby numbers fascination: not what someone who understands BB wastes time with.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Again

[NarcissisticDeity]

More fascination with numbers-not what someone who understands BB wastes time with.

LMFAO understands BB? this is comming from then genius who said Haney is a B-teir Mr Olympia lol your understanding on bodybuilding is remarkable  go away , please .

[sculpture]

If someone would be so kind to post that gif. of him transforming as his career progresses it would be useful. Its a series of front double bicep shots that clearly illustrate the gap between 1996 and 1998, 99 etc

[pumpster]

More fascination with numbers-not what someone who understands BB wastes time with.

LMFAO understands BB? this is comming from then genius who said Haney is a B-teir Mr Olympia

Obsessing on numbers the way U do is a dead giveaway that your understandings of BB are facile, without a doubt. Same thing regarding your worship of hugely flawed co-rulers of tier-B, Haney & Yates.

I salute you on your gullability regarding Weider's choices as Mr. Olympia; so Iron Age! 

[NarcissisticDeity]

but you can't have an impressive back double bi (in terms of the back) without them.

Its like having great biceps with no triceps: your arms loose impressiveness.

When I see a Yates back double bi, it would look great if he had no arms - seriously. the poor arms ruin the look of the back for me.

And, to me, the calves are not a direct component of how good your back is.
the arms are.(since I know ND will chime in about how Ronnie's back double bi is not as good because of his calves).

One you keep insisting that Yates has no arms , thats a phallacy , his arms in his primes were perfect , you're mistaking his lack of bicep peaks as weak arms , and thats just plain wrong

And I'm sorry Hulkster the judges specifically ask for one leg back and to flex the calf while doing the backdouble bicep pose , so while Dorian doesn't have highpeaked biceps , Ronnie doesn't have any calve development , no seperation between or development of the gastrocnemius or the soleus , and the judges are asking to see this when the calve is flexed , so while you may not think its a big deal it becomes one when the guy you're standing next too has some of the best diamond shapped calves ever !!

Ronnie has an awesome back doublebicep shot , he has a great back , awesome biceps , great development & seperation , but when you stand him next to Yates some things become apparent , Ronnie's better biceps , and his gigantic ass and his lack of calves , the whole shot is also lacking balance & proportion

When Dorian's backdouble bicep shot is taken straight-on you can clearly see his biceps , while NOT as great as Ronnie's they're not as bad as your claiming to be , here are a few shots of his back straight on and you can clearly see his biceps !!

[NarcissisticDeity]

Again

[NarcissisticDeity]

Again

[pumpster]

Flapjacks, pt. III..


The *ONLY* time Yates had a little more size was in those black & white shots-where he was also PUFFY n' PASTY..

[sculpture]

So let me get this straight - dorians lack of bicep development, poor peak, whatever way you want to describe it, actually helps his back double bi shot. Conversely ronnies incredible biceps detract from the pose?

[NarcissisticDeity]

Flapjacks, pt. III..


The *ONLY* time Yates had a little more size was in those black & white shots-where he was also PUFFY n' PASTY..

Puffy? and you've got the balls to say I don't have any understanding lol you're such a fool lol he's 269lbs and hard as nails , and dense as a canonball , pumpster you really need to stay out of these debates and then the mentally able have free range , you go and sit at the kids table and color  , lol puffy lol another classic pumpster gem !!

[NarcissisticDeity]

So let me get this straight - dorians lack of bicep development, poor peak, whatever way you want to describe it, actually helps his back double bi shot. Conversely ronnies incredible biceps detract from the pose?

How did you make that leap? where did I say it helps Dorian and hurts Ronnie? no I said if you stand the two together , things become very apparent , Ronnie's bicpes are a lot better than Dorians and Dorian's calves are a lot better than Ronnies , and you also notice , Ronnie's gigantic ass and his overall lack of balance , you'll notice Dorian's lower back his shredded and Ronnie's isn't !!

[sculpture]

Ronnie has an awesome back doublebicep shot , he has a great back , awesome biceps , great development & seperation , but when you stand him next to Yates some things become apparent , Ronnie's better biceps , and his gigantic ass and his lack of calves , the whole shot is also lacking balance & proportion

"The whole shot is lacking balance and proportion".

Please stop suggesting strong biceps play a role in this imagined flaw.

[NarcissisticDeity]

"The whole shot is lacking balance and proportion".

Please stop suggesting strong biceps play a role in this imagined flaw.

Oh poor balance & proportion is an imaginary flaw  are you okay?  you ever hear that strong bodyparts can be a weakness?

Here is Ronnie's backdouble bicep shot , middleweights calves , superheavyweights quads , superheavyweights glutes , middleweights waist , heavyweights back , heavyweights delts , superheavyweights biceps/triceps and heavyweights forearms , no muscle continutity , can you contemplate this? his biceps/triceps are bigger than his delts lol his calves look like sticks ontop of massive quads , his ass sticks out , don't get me wrong he has an impressive backdouble bicep , a freaky backdouble bicep shot , but its not textbook !!

[The Ugly]

Puffy? and you've got the balls to say I don't have any understanding lol you're such a fool lol he's 269lbs and hard as nails , and dense as a canonball , pumpster you really need to stay out of these debates and then the mentally able have free range , you go and sit at the kids table and color  , lol puffy lol another classic pumpster gem !!

Knock off this faggy, 6th grade loling. Just knock it off.