why do you keep ignorning the fact that i listed polls from ronnies best years and he lost to yates in those polls. you keep referring to the ONLY source that matches your view.
explain yourself.
polls are useless unless they provide excellents shots of each competitor to use as a basis for voting.
you can't just say who is better.
which year?
which condition?
at what weight? etc etc.
For example, you say you have polls where dorian won over an 01 Ronnie.
which 01? His Arnold classic form (amazing) or his olympia form (like shit)?
you don't seem to understand just how good Iceman's polls were on all those boards because they did what no other polls do: provide great evidence from both sides and let the fans decided fairly.
Iceman's polls were excellent because they gave great and fair representations of dorian and Ronnie at their bests.
and look what happened.
its a result that you may try and avoid dealing with, but its the opinion of people 'in the know' out there.
you clowns are not.
Study this post. you might learn something.